The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aberrant chromosome morphology in human cells defective for Holliday junction resolution
Open accessAbstract
In somatic cells, Holliday junctions can be formed between sister chromatids during the recombinational repair of DNA breaks or after replication fork demise. A variety of processes act upon Holliday junctions to remove them from DNA, in events that are critical for proper chromosome segregation. In human cells, the BLM protein, inactivated in individuals with Bloom’s syndrome, acts in combination with topoisomerase IIIα, RMI1 and RMI2 (BTR complex) to promote the dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cells defective for BLM exhibit elevated levels of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and patients with Bloom’s syndrome develop a broad spectrum of early-onset cancers caused by chromosome instability. MUS81–EME1 (refs 4–7), SLX1–SLX4 (refs 8–11) and GEN1 (refs 12, 13) also process Holliday junctions but, in contrast to the BTR complex, do so by endonucleolytic cleavage. Here we deplete these nucleases from Bloom’s syndrome cells to analyse human cells compromised for the known Holliday junction dissolution/resolution pathways. We show that depletion of MUS81 and GEN1, or SLX4 and GEN1, from Bloom’s syndrome cells results in severe chromosome abnormalities, such that sister chromatids remain interlinked in a side-by-side arrangement and the chromosomes are elongated and segmented. Our results indicate that normally replicating human cells require Holliday junction processing activities to prevent sister chromatid entanglements and thereby ensure accurate chromosome condensation. This phenotype was not apparent when both MUS81 and SLX4 were depleted from Bloom’s syndrome cells, suggesting that GEN1 can compensate for their absence. Additionally, we show that depletion of MUS81 or SLX4 reduces the high frequency of SCEs in Bloom’s syndrome cells, indicating that MUS81 and SLX4 promote SCE formation, in events that may ultimately drive the chromosome instabilities that underpin early-onset cancers associated with Bloom’s syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer predisposition and hematopoietic failure in Rad50 S/S mice
Bender, C. F., Sikes, M. L., Sullivan, R., Huye, L. E., Le Beau, M. M., Roth, D. B., Mirzoeva, O. K., Oltz, E. M., & Petrini, J. H. J. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1007902 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Playing the End Game: DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice
Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. G., & Boulton, S. J. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029 · Cited by 1,625
The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle
Hustedt, N., & Durocher, D. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3452 · Cited by 738
Aguilera, A., & García-Muse, T. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133232 · Cited by 476
Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship
Nalepa, G., & Clapp, D. W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.116 · Cited by 389
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Wechsler, T., Newman, S., & West, S. C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 471
- Issue
- 7340
- Pages
- 642-646
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1987146639
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aberrant chromosome morphology in human cells defective for Holliday junction resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09790
- The paper
- Wechsler, T., Newman, S., & West, S. C. (2011). Aberrant chromosome morphology in human cells defective for Holliday junction resolution. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.