Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451

Open access
Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., Loeb, A., Narayan, R., Frail, D. A., Petitpas, G. R., Brunthaler, A., Chornock, R., Carpenter, J. M., Pooley, G. G., Mooley, K., Kulkarni, S. R., Margutti, R., Fox, D. B., Nakar, E., Patel, N. A., Volgenau, N. H., Culverhouse, T. L., Bietenholz, M. F., Rupen, M. P., Max-Moerbeck, W., Readhead, A. C. S., Richards, J., Shepherd, M., Storm, S., Hull, C. L. H.·2011·Nature

Abstract

Active galactic nuclei, which are powered by long-term accretion onto central supermassive black holes, produce relativistic jets with lifetimes of at least one million years, and the observation of the birth of such a jet is therefore unlikely. Transient accretion onto a supermassive black hole, for example through the tidal disruption of a stray star, thus offers a rare opportunity to study the birth of a relativistic jet. On 25 March 2011, an unusual transient source (Swift J164449.3+573451) was found, potentially representing such an accretion event. Here we report observations spanning centimetre to millimetre wavelengths and covering the first month of evolution of a luminous radio transient associated with Swift J164449.3+573451. The radio transient coincides with the nucleus of an inactive galaxy. We conclude that we are seeing a newly formed relativistic outflow, launched by transient accretion onto a million-solar-mass black hole. A relativistic outflow is not predicted in this situation, but we show that the tidal disruption of a star naturally explains the observed high-energy properties and radio luminosity and the inferred rate of such events. The weaker beaming in the radio-frequency spectrum relative to γ-rays or X-rays suggests that radio searches may uncover similar events out to redshifts of z ≈ 6.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10366

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., Loeb, A., Narayan, R., Frail, D. A., Petitpas, G. R., Brunthaler, A., Chornock, R., Carpenter, J. M., Pooley, G. G., Mooley, K., Kulkarni, S. R., Margutti, R., Fox, D. B., Nakar, E., Patel, N. A., Volgenau, N. H., Culverhouse, T. L., Bietenholz, M. F., Rupen, M. P., Max-Moerbeck, W., Readhead, A. C. S., Richards, J., Shepherd, M., Storm, S., & Hull, C. L. H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-08
Volume
476
Issue
7361
Pages
425-428
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2155172869
Cited by
423
References
21
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10366
The paper
Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., Loeb, A., Narayan, R., Frail, D. A., Petitpas, G. R., Brunthaler, A., Chornock, R., Carpenter, J. M., Pooley, G. G., Mooley, K., Kulkarni, S. R., Margutti, R., Fox, D. B., Nakar, E., Patel, N. A., Volgenau, N. H., Culverhouse, T. L., . . . Hull, C. L. H. (2011). Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10366

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.