The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The host galaxies and classification of active galactic nuclei
Open accessAbstract
We present an analysis of the host properties of 85 224 emission-line galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We show that Seyferts and low-ionization narrow emission-line regions (LINERs) form clearly separated branches on the standard optical diagnostic diagrams. We derive a new empirical classification scheme which cleanly separates star-forming galaxies, composite active galactic nucleus–H ii (AGN–H ii) galaxies, Seyferts and LINERs and we study the host galaxy properties of these different classes of objects. LINERs are older, more massive, less dusty, less concentrated, and they have higher velocity dispersions and lower [O iii] luminosities than Seyfert galaxies have. Seyferts and LINERs are most strongly distinguished by their [O iii] luminosities. We then consider the quantity L[O iii]/σ4, which is an indicator of the black hole accretion rate relative to the Eddington rate. Remarkably, we find that at fixedL[O iii]/σ4, all differences between Seyfert and LINER host properties disappear. LINERs and Seyferts form a continuous sequence, with LINERs dominant at low L/LEDD and Seyferts dominant at high L/LEDD. These results suggest that the majority of LINERs are AGN and that the Seyfert/LINER dichotomy is analogous to the high/low-state models and show that pure LINERs require a harder ionizing radiation field with lower ionization parameter than required by Seyfert galaxies, consistent with the low and high X-ray binary states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars
Narayan, R., & Yi, I. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176343 · Cited by 1,679
Cited by
Birth of a relativistic outflow in the unusual γ-ray transient Swift J164449.3+573451
Zauderer, B. A., Berger, E., Soderberg, A. M., Loeb, A., Narayan, R., Frail, D. A., Petitpas, G. R., Brunthaler, A., Chornock, R., Carpenter, J. M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10366 · Cited by 423
SDSS IV MaNGA – spatially resolved diagnostic diagrams: a proof that many galaxies are LIERs
Belfiore, F., Maiolino, R., Maraston, C., Emsellem, E., Bershady, M. A., Masters, K. L., Yan, R., Bizyaev, D., Boquien, M., Brownstein, J. R., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1234 · Cited by 363
Self-citationYao, Y., Ravi, V., Gezari, S., van Velzen, S., Lu, W., Schulze, S., Somalwar, J. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Hammerstein, E., Nicholl, M., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf216 · Cited by 219
Newman, A. B., Belli, S., Ellis, R. S., & Patel, S. G. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacd4d · Cited by 60
Predicting the Spectrum of UGC 2885, Rubin’s Galaxy with Machine Learning
Holwerda, B. W., Wu, J. F., Keel, W. C., Young, J., Mullins, R., Hinz, J., Ford, K. E. S., Barmby, P., Chandar, R., Bailin, J., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abffcc · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 372
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 961-976
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2124999166
- Cited by
- 2,160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The host galaxies and classification of active galactic nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x
- The paper
- Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. (2006). The host galaxies and classification of active galactic nuclei. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.