The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase
Open accessAbstract
Multisite phosphorylation of proteins has been proposed to transform a graded protein kinase signal into an ultrasensitive switch-like response. Although many multiphosphorylated targets have been identified, the dynamics and sequence of individual phosphorylation events within the multisite phosphorylation process have never been thoroughly studied. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the initiation of S phase is thought to be governed by complexes of Cdk1 and Cln cyclins that phosphorylate six or more sites on the Clb5–Cdk1 inhibitor Sic1, directing it to SCF-mediated destruction. The resulting Sic1-free Clb5–Cdk1 complex triggers S phase. Here, we demonstrate that Sic1 destruction depends on a more complex process in which both Cln2–Cdk1 and Clb5–Cdk1 act in processive multiphosphorylation cascades leading to the phosphorylation of a small number of specific phosphodegrons. The routes of these phosphorylation cascades are shaped by precisely oriented docking interactions mediated by cyclin-specific docking motifs in Sic1 and by Cks1, the phospho-adaptor subunit of Cdk1. Our results indicate that Clb5–Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation generates positive feedback that is required for switch-like Sic1 destruction. Our evidence for a docking network within clusters of phosphorylation sites uncovers a new level of complexity in Cdk1-dependent regulation of cell cycle transitions, and has general implications for the regulation of cellular processes by multisite phosphorylation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tang, X., Orlicky, S., Lin, Z., Willems, A., Neculai, D., Ceccarelli, D., Mercurio, F., Shilton, B. H., Sicheri, F., & Tyers, M. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.042 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases
Bertoli, C., Skotheim, J. M., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3629 · Cited by 1,500
Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation
Swaney, D. L., Beltrao, P., Starita, L., Guo, A., Rush, J., Fields, S., Krogan, N. J., & Villén, J. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2519 · Cited by 599
Physicochemical Properties of Cells and Their Effects on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs)
Theillet, F.-X., Binolfi, A., Frembgen-Kesner, T., Hingorani, K., Sarkar, M., Kyne, C., Li, C., Crowley, P. B., Gierasch, L., Pielak, G. J., et al. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400695p · Cited by 503
Maréchal, A., & Zou, L. (2015) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2014.147 · Cited by 465
Alzheimer’s disease: Ablating single master site abolishes tau hyperphosphorylation
Stefanoska, K., Gajwani, M., Tan, A. R. P., Ahel, H. I., Asih, P. R., Volkerling, A., Poljak, A., & Ittner, A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8809 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Kõivomägi, M., Valk, E., Venta, R., Iofik, A., Lepiku, M., Balog, E. R. M., Rubin, S. M., Morgan, D. O., & Loog, M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-10-12
- Volume
- 480
- Issue
- 7375
- Pages
- 128-131
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2083474696
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10560
- The paper
- Kõivomägi, M., Valk, E., Venta, R., Iofik, A., Lepiku, M., Balog, E. R. M., Rubin, S. M., Morgan, D. O., & Loog, M. (2011). Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.