Cited by 946Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectQuantum Information and CryptographyMechanical and Optical Resonators

Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit

Open access
Wilson, C. M., Johansson, G., Pourkabirian, A., Simoen, M., Johansson, J. R., Duty, T., Nori, F., Delsing, P.·2011·Nature

Abstract

One of the most surprising predictions of modern quantum theory is that the vacuum of space is not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with virtual particles flitting in and out of existence. Although initially a curiosity, it was quickly realized that these vacuum fluctuations had measurable consequences--for instance, producing the Lamb shift of atomic spectra and modifying the magnetic moment of the electron. This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central to our understanding of nature. However, these effects provide indirect evidence for the existence of vacuum fluctuations. From early on, it was discussed whether it might be possible to more directly observe the virtual particles that compose the quantum vacuum. Forty years ago, it was suggested that a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could convert virtual photons into directly observable real photons. The phenomenon, later termed the dynamical Casimir effect, has not been demonstrated previously. Here we observe the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit consisting of a coplanar transmission line with a tunable electrical length. The rate of change of the electrical length can be made very fast (a substantial fraction of the speed of light) by modulating the inductance of a superconducting quantum interference device at high frequencies (>10 gigahertz). In addition to observing the creation of real photons, we detect two-mode squeezing in the emitted radiation, which is a signature of the quantum character of the generation process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10561

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dynamical Casimir effect due to moving boundaries was first observed in a superconducting circuit in 2011, in a context where gravity can be neglected.

    “The correction to the Casimir energy due to moving boundaries, the dynamical Casimir effect, was first observed in a superconducting circuit in 2011 [17], in a context where gravity can be neglected.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  2. [4]H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. Kon. Nederland. Akad. Wetensch. B51 , 793 (1948).
  3. [15]P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, arXiv quant-ph (2011), 1103.0835v1.
  4. [17]S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. Davies, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 348 , 393 (1976).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, C. M., Johansson, G., Pourkabirian, A., Simoen, M., Johansson, J. R., Duty, T., Nori, F., & Delsing, P.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, C. M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-11
Volume
479
Issue
7373
Pages
376-379
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2120424887
Cited by
946
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 55
FWCI
36.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22224007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
dynamical Casimir effect, superconducting circuits, vacuum fluctuations, virtual photons, photon pair generation, two-mode squeezing, superconducting quantum interference devices, coplanar transmission lines, Lamb shift, Casimir effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review