The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expression of tumour-specific antigens underlies cancer immunoediting
Open accessAbstract
Cancer immunoediting is a process by which immune cells, particularly lymphocytes of the adaptive immune system, protect the host from the development of cancer and alter tumour progression by driving the outgrowth of tumour cells with decreased sensitivity to immune attack. Carcinogen-induced mouse models of cancer have shown that primary tumour susceptibility is thereby enhanced in immune-compromised mice, whereas the capacity for such tumours to grow after transplantation into wild-type mice is reduced. However, many questions about the process of cancer immunoediting remain unanswered, in part because of the known antigenic complexity and heterogeneity of carcinogen-induced tumours. Here we adapted a genetically engineered, autochthonous mouse model of sarcomagenesis to investigate the process of cancer immunoediting. This system allows us to monitor the onset and growth of immunogenic and non-immunogenic tumours induced in situ that harbour identical genetic and histopathological characteristics. By comparing the development of such tumours in immune-competent mice with their development in mice with broad immunodeficiency or specific antigenic tolerance, we show that recognition of tumour-specific antigens by lymphocytes is critical for immunoediting against sarcomas. Furthermore, primary sarcomas were edited to become less immunogenic through the selective outgrowth of cells that were able to escape T lymphocyte attack. Loss of tumour antigen expression or presentation on major histocompatibility complex I was necessary and sufficient for this immunoediting process to occur. These results highlight the importance of tumour-specific-antigen expression in immune surveillance, and potentially, immunotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer despite immunosurveillance: immunoselection and immunosubversion
Zitvogel, L., Tesniere, A., & Kroemer, G. (2006) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1936 · Cited by 1,324
Natural selection of tumor variants in the generation of “tumor escape” phenotypes
Khong, H. T., & Restifo, N. P. (2002) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1102-999 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy
Schumacher, T. N., & Schreiber, R. D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa4971 · Cited by 4,783
Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response
Restifo, N. P., Dudley, M. E., & Rosenberg, S. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3191 · Cited by 1,688
Mittal, D., Gubin, M. M., Schreiber, R. D., & Smyth, M. J. (2014) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,471
Spranger, S., Dai, D., Horton, B., & Gajewski, T. F. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.003 · Cited by 1,441
Metadata
- Authors
- DuPage, M., Mazumdar, C., Schmidt, L. M., Cheung, A. F., & Jacks, T.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 482
- Issue
- 7385
- Pages
- 405-409
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2107079238
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expression of tumour-specific antigens underlies cancer immunoediting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10803
- The paper
- DuPage, M., Mazumdar, C., Schmidt, L. M., Cheung, A. F., & Jacks, T. (2012). Expression of tumour-specific antigens underlies cancer immunoediting. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.