Cited by 972Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesTopological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics

Creating, moving and merging Dirac points with a Fermi gas in a tunable honeycomb lattice

Open access
Tarruell, Leticia, Greif, Daniel, Uehlinger, Thomas, Jotzu, Gregor, Esslinger, Tilman·2012·Nature

Abstract

Dirac points are central to many phenomena in condensed-matter physics, from massless electrons in graphene to the emergence of conducting edge states in topological insulators. At a Dirac point, two energy bands intersect linearly and the electrons behave as relativistic Dirac fermions. In solids, the rigid structure of the material determines the mass and velocity of the electrons, as well as their interactions. A different, highly flexible means of studying condensed-matter phenomena is to create model systems using ultracold atoms trapped in the periodic potential of interfering laser beams. Here we report the creation of Dirac points with adjustable properties in a tunable honeycomb optical lattice. Using momentum-resolved interband transitions, we observe a minimum bandgap inside the Brillouin zone at the positions of the two Dirac points. We exploit the unique tunability of our lattice potential to adjust the effective mass of the Dirac fermions by breaking inversion symmetry. Moreover, changing the lattice anisotropy allows us to change the positions of the Dirac points inside the Brillouin zone. When the anisotropy exceeds a critical limit, the two Dirac points merge and annihilate each other-a situation that has recently attracted considerable theoretical interest but that is extremely challenging to observe in solids. We map out this topological transition in lattice parameter space and find excellent agreement with ab initio calculations. Our results not only pave the way to model materials in which the topology of the band structure is crucial, but also provide an avenue to exploring many-body phases resulting from the interplay of complex lattice geometries with interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10871

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The band structure related to Dirac cones has been widely investigated in the energy-momentum space using bulk measurement with measured density and dispersion pattern.

    “The band structure related to Dirac cones has been widely investigated in the energy-momentum space using the bulk measurement with measured density and dispersion pattern [10, 22-25].”

    From Observing movement of Dirac cones from single-photon dynamics (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The paper reports measuring the gas’s quasi-momentum distribution and using momentum-resolved interband transitions to locate Dirac points (pp. 2–3). But the Methods (p. 5) say the energy spectrum was obtained from a numerical band-structure calculation, not a measured energy–momentum dispersion pattern. This paper also cannot, by itself, establish that the approach was widely investigated. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 972

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Soltan-Panahi, P., L¨ uhmann, D.-S., Struck, J., Windpassinger, P. & Sengstock, K. Quantum phase transition to unconventional multi-orbital superfluidity in optical lattices. Nature Phys. in press (2011).

Authors
Tarruell, L., Greif, D., Uehlinger, T., Jotzu, G., & Esslinger, T.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Esslinger, Tilman
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-03
Volume
483
Issue
7389
Pages
302-305
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2056404648
Cited by
972
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 29
FWCI
51.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Keywords
Dirac point, Dirac fermions, honeycomb optical lattice, ultracold atoms, Fermi gas, topological phase transition, effective mass, lattice anisotropy, inversion symmetry breaking, band gap, topological insulators, graphene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review