Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 735

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia

Open access
Smith, Catherine C., Wang, Qi, Chin, Chen-Shan, Salerno, Sara, Damon, Lauren E., Levis, Mark J., Perl, Alexander E., Travers, Kevin J., Wang, Susana, Hunt, Jeremy P., Zarrinkar, Patrick P., Schadt, Eric E., Kasarskis, Andrew, Kuriyan, John, Shah, Neil P.·2012·Nature

Abstract

Effective targeted cancer therapeutic development depends upon distinguishing disease-associated ‘driver’ mutations, which have causative roles in malignancy pathogenesis, from ‘passenger’ mutations, which are dispensable for cancer initiation and maintenance. Translational studies of clinically active targeted therapeutics can definitively discriminate driver from passenger lesions and provide valuable insights into human cancer biology. Activating internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) are detected in approximately 20% of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients and are associated with a poor prognosis. Abundant scientific and clinical evidence, including the lack of convincing clinical activity of early FLT3 inhibitors, suggests that FLT3-ITD probably represents a passenger lesion. Here we report point mutations at three residues within the kinase domain of FLT3-ITD that confer substantial in vitro resistance to AC220 (quizartinib), an active investigational inhibitor of FLT3, KIT, PDGFRA, PDGFRB and RET; evolution of AC220-resistant substitutions at two of these amino acid positions was observed in eight of eight FLT3-ITD-positive AML patients with acquired resistance to AC220. Our findings demonstrate that FLT3-ITD can represent a driver lesion and valid therapeutic target in human AML. AC220-resistant FLT3 kinase domain mutants represent high-value targets for future FLT3 inhibitor development efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 735

Metadata

Authors
Smith, C. C., Wang, Q., Chin, C.-S., Salerno, S., Damon, L. E., Levis, M. J., Perl, A. E., Travers, K. J., Wang, S., Hunt, J. P., Zarrinkar, P. P., Schadt, E. E., Kasarskis, A., Kuriyan, J., & Shah, N. P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-04-15
Volume
485
Issue
7397
Pages
260-263
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1984209370
Cited by
735
References
2
FWCI
40.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11016
The paper
Smith, C. C., Wang, Q., Chin, C.-S., Salerno, S., Damon, L. E., Levis, M. J., Perl, A. E., Travers, K. J., Wang, S., Hunt, J. P., Zarrinkar, P. P., Schadt, E. E., Kasarskis, A., Kuriyan, J., & Shah, N. P. (2012). Validation of ITD mutations in FLT3 as a therapeutic target in human acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.