Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field

Open access
Walter, Fabian, Decarli, Roberto, Carilli, Chris, Bertoldi, Frank, Cox, Pierre, Da Cunha, Elisabete, Daddi, Emanuele, Dickinson, Mark, Downes, Dennis, Elbaz, David, Ellis, Richard, Hodge, Jacqueline, Neri, Roberto, Riechers, Dominik A., Weiss, Axel, Bell, Eric, Dannerbauer, Helmut, Krips, Melanie, Krumholz, Mark, Lentati, Lindley, Maiolino, Roberto, Menten, Karl, Rix, Hans-Walter, Robertson, Brant, Spinrad, Hyron, Stark, Dan P., Stern, Daniel·2012·Nature

Abstract

The Hubble Deep Field provides one of the deepest multiwavelength views of the distant Universe and has led to the detection of thousands of galaxies seen throughout cosmic time. An early map of the Hubble Deep Field at a wavelength of 850 micrometres, which is sensitive to dust emission powered by star formation, revealed the brightest source in the field, dubbed HDF 850.1 (ref. 2). For more than a decade, and despite significant efforts, no counterpart was found at shorter wavelengths, and it was not possible to determine its redshift, size or mass. Here we report a redshift of z = 5.183 for HDF 850.1, from a millimetre-wave molecular line scan. This places HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2, corresponding to a cosmic age of only 1.1 billion years after the Big Bang. This redshift is significantly higher than earlier estimates and higher than those of most of the hundreds of submillimetre-bright galaxies identified so far. The source has a star-formation rate of 850 solar masses per year and is spatially resolved on scales of 5 kiloparsecs, with an implied dynamical mass of about 1.3 × 1011 solar masses, a significant fraction of which is present in the form of molecular gas. Despite our accurate determination of redshift and position, a counterpart emitting starlight remains elusive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11073

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Walter, F., Decarli, R., Carilli, C., Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Da Cunha, E., Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Downes, D., Elbaz, D., Ellis, R., Hodge, J., Neri, R., Riechers, D. A., Weiss, A., Bell, E., Dannerbauer, H., Krips, M., Krumholz, M., Lentati, L., Maiolino, R., Menten, K., Rix, H.-W., Robertson, B., Spinrad, H., Stark, D. P., & Stern, D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-06
Volume
486
Issue
7402
Pages
233-236
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2019866699
Cited by
290
References
28
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11073
The paper
Walter, F., Decarli, R., Carilli, C., Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Da Cunha, E., Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Downes, D., Elbaz, D., Ellis, R., Hodge, J., Neri, R., Riechers, D. A., Weiss, A., Bell, E., Dannerbauer, H., Krips, M., Krumholz, M., . . . Stern, D. (2012). The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.