Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants

Open access
D’Hont, Angélique, Denoeud, France, Aury, Jean-Marc, Baurens, Franc-Christophe, Carreel, Françoise, Garsmeur, Olivier, Noel, Benjamin, Bocs, Stéphanie, Droc, Gaëtan, Rouard, Mathieu, Da Silva, Corinne, Jabbari, Kamel, Cardi, Céline, Poulain, Julie, Souquet, Marlène, Labadie, Karine, Jourda, Cyril, Lengellé, Juliette, Rodier-Goud, Marguerite, Alberti, Adriana, Bernard, Maria, Correa, Margot, Ayyampalayam, Saravanaraj, Mckain, Michael R., Leebens-Mack, Jim, Burgess, Diane, Freeling, Mike, Mbéguié-A-Mbéguié, Didier, Chabannes, Matthieu, Wicker, Thomas, Panaud, Olivier, Barbosa, Jose, Hribova, Eva, Heslop-Harrison, Pat, Habas, Rémy, Rivallan, Ronan, Francois, Philippe, Poiron, Claire, Kilian, Andrzej, Burthia, Dheema, Jenny, Christophe, Bakry, Frédéric, Brown, Spencer, Guignon, Valentin, Kema, Gert, Dita, Miguel, Waalwijk, Cees, Joseph, Steeve, Dievart, Anne, Jaillon, Olivier, Leclercq, Julie, Argout, Xavier, Lyons, Eric, Almeida, Ana, Jeridi, Mouna, Dolezel, Jaroslav, Roux, Nicolas, Risterucci, Ange-Marie, Weissenbach, Jean, Ruiz, Manuel, Glaszmann, Jean-Christophe, Quétier, Francis, Yahiaoui, Nabila, Wincker, Patrick·2012·Nature

Abstract

The sequencing and analysis of the banana genome is reported; these results inform plant phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution, and provide a resource for future genetic improvement of this important crop species. Bananas (Musa spp.) are a staple food and a major source of income in many tropical and subtropical countries. This paper reports the sequencing and analysis of the banana genome. This is the first non-grass monocotyledon to have its genome sequenced, providing an important bridge for comparative genome analysis in plants. Global banana production is under threat from increasingly well-adapted pests and diseases, so the availability of the genome sequence is an important resource for future crop development and improvement. Bananas (Musa spp.), including dessert and cooking types, are giant perennial monocotyledonous herbs of the order Zingiberales, a sister group to the well-studied Poales, which include cereals. Bananas are vital for food security in many tropical and subtropical countries and the most popular fruit in industrialized countries1. The Musa domestication process started some 7,000 years ago in Southeast Asia. It involved hybridizations between diverse species and subspecies, fostered by human migrations2, and selection of diploid and triploid seedless, parthenocarpic hybrids thereafter widely dispersed by vegetative propagation. Half of the current production relies on somaclones derived from a single triploid genotype (Cavendish)1. Pests and diseases have gradually become adapted, representing an imminent danger for global banana production3,4. Here we describe the draft sequence of the 523-megabase genome of a Musa acuminata doubled-haploid genotype, providing a crucial stepping-stone for genetic improvement of banana. We detected three rounds of whole-genome duplications in the Musa lineage, independently of those previously described in the Poales lineage and the one we detected in the Arecales lineage. This first monocotyledon high-continuity whole-genome sequence reported outside Poales represents an essential bridge for comparative genome analysis in plants. As such, it clarifies commelinid-monocotyledon phylogenetic relationships, reveals Poaceae-specific features and has led to the discovery of conserved non-coding sequences predating monocotyledon–eudicotyledon divergence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11241

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 1,151

Metadata

Authors
D’Hont, A., Denoeud, F., Aury, J.-M., Baurens, F.-C., Carreel, F., Garsmeur, O., Noel, B., Bocs, S., Droc, G., Rouard, M., Da Silva, C., Jabbari, K., Cardi, C., Poulain, J., Souquet, M., Labadie, K., Jourda, C., Lengellé, J., Rodier-Goud, M., Alberti, A., Bernard, M., Correa, M., Ayyampalayam, S., Mckain, M. R., Leebens-Mack, J., Burgess, D., Freeling, M., Mbéguié-A-Mbéguié, D., Chabannes, M., Wicker, T., Panaud, O., Barbosa, J., Hribova, E., Heslop-Harrison, P., Habas, R., Rivallan, R., Francois, P., Poiron, C., Kilian, A., Burthia, D., Jenny, C., Bakry, F., Brown, S., Guignon, V., Kema, G., Dita, M., Waalwijk, C., Joseph, S., Dievart, A., Jaillon, O., Leclercq, J., Argout, X., Lyons, E., Almeida, A., Jeridi, M., Dolezel, J., Roux, N., Risterucci, A.-M., Weissenbach, J., Ruiz, M., Glaszmann, J.-C., Quétier, F., Yahiaoui, N., & Wincker, P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
488
Issue
7410
Pages
213-217
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2061918046
Cited by
1,151
References
6
FWCI
90.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11241
The paper
D’Hont, A., Denoeud, F., Aury, J.-M., Baurens, F.-C., Carreel, F., Garsmeur, O., Noel, B., Bocs, S., Droc, G., Rouard, M., Da Silva, C., Jabbari, K., Cardi, C., Poulain, J., Souquet, M., Labadie, K., Jourda, C., Lengellé, J., Rodier-Goud, M., . . . Wincker, P. (2012). The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.