The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plant breeders require access to new genetic diversity to satisfy the demands of a growing human population for more food that can be produced in a variable or changing climate and to deliver the high‐quality food with nutritional and health benefits demanded by consumers. The close relatives of domesticated plants, crop wild relatives (CWR s), represent a practical gene pool for use by plant breeders. Genomics of CWR generates data that support the use of CWR to expand the genetic diversity of crop plants. Advances in DNA sequencing technology are enabling the efficient sequencing of CWR and their increased use in crop improvement. As the sequencing of genomes of major crop species is completed, attention has shifted to analysis of the wider gene pool of major crops including CWR. A combination of de novo sequencing and resequencing is required to efficiently explore useful genetic variation in CWR. Analysis of the nuclear genome, transcriptome and maternal (chloroplast and mitochondrial) genome of CWR is facilitating their use in crop improvement. Genome analysis results in discovery of useful alleles in CWR and identification of regions of the genome in which diversity has been lost in domestication bottlenecks. Targeting of high priority CWR for sequencing will maximize the contribution of genome sequencing of CWR. Coordination of global efforts to apply genomics has the potential to accelerate access to and conservation of the biodiversity essential to the sustainability of agriculture and food production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zohary, D., Hopf, M., & Weiss, E. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199549061.001.0001 · Cited by 2,987
Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon
Initiative, T. I. B. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08747 · Cited by 1,846
A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice
Huang, X., Kurata, N., Wei, X., Wang, Z.-X., Wang, A., Zhao, Q., Zhao, Y., Liu, K., Lu, H., Li, W., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11532 · Cited by 1,634
TOWARD A RATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS
Harlan, J. R., & de Wet, J. M. J. (1971) · TAXON · doi:10.2307/1218252 · Cited by 1,170
The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants
D’Hont, A., Denoeud, F., Aury, J.-M., Baurens, F.-C., Carreel, F., Garsmeur, O., Noel, B., Bocs, S., Droc, G., Rouard, M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11241 · Cited by 1,151
The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years
Hajjar, R., & Hodgkin, T. (2007) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0 · Cited by 1,104
Zhou, Z., Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., Gou, Z., Lyu, J., Li, W., Yu, Y., Shu, L., Zhao, Y., Ma, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3096 · Cited by 1,102
Eshed, Y., & Zamir, D. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/141.3.1147 · Cited by 1,098
Lam, H.-M., Xu, X., Liu, X., Chen, W., Yang, G., Wong, F.-L., Li, M.-W., He, W., Qin, N., Wang, B., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.715 · Cited by 1,062
Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability
Mickelbart, M. V., Hasegawa, P. M., & Bailey-Serres, J. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3901 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding
Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., Zhang, X., Prasanna, B. M., & Olsen, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx135 · Cited by 336
Prohens, J., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Dempewolf, H., Kilian, B., Díez, M. J., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Soler, S., et al. (2017) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-1938-9 · Cited by 206
Advances in genomics for adapting crops to climate change
Scheben, A., Yuan, Y., & Edwards, D. (2016) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2016.09.001 · Cited by 117
Starch Biosynthesis in the Developing Endosperms of Grasses and Cereals
Tetlow, I. J., & Emes, M. J. (2017) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy7040081 · Cited by 112
Advanced domestication: harnessing the precision of gene editing in crop breeding
Lyzenga, W. J., Pozniak, C. J., & Kagale, S. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13576 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Brozynska, M., Furtado, A., & Henry, R. J.
- Venue
- Plant Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1070-1085
- ISSN
- 1467-7644 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7652
- OpenAlex
- W2168650570
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 28.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/pbi.12454
- The paper
- Brozynska, M., Furtado, A., & Henry, R. J. (2016). Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
