Cited by 345Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstro and Planetary Science

A primordial origin for misalignments between stellar spin axes and planetary orbits

Open access
Batygin, Konstantin·2012·Nature

Abstract

The existence of gaseous giant planets whose orbits lie close to their host stars ('hot Jupiters') can largely be accounted for by planetary migration associated with viscous evolution of proto-planetary nebulae. Recently, observations of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect during planetary transits have revealed that a considerable fraction of hot Jupiters are on orbits that are misaligned with respect to the spin axes of their host stars. This observation has cast doubt on the importance of disk-driven migration as a mechanism for producing hot Jupiters. Here I show that misaligned orbits can be a natural consequence of disk migration in binary systems whose orbital plane is uncorrelated with the spin axes of the individual stars. The gravitational torques arising from the dynamical evolution of idealized proto-planetary disks under perturbations from massive distant bodies act to misalign the orbital planes of the disks relative to the spin poles of their host stars. As a result, I suggest that in the absence of strong coupling between the angular momentum of the disk and that of the host star, or of sufficient dissipation that acts to realign the stellar spin axis and the planetary orbits, the fraction of planetary systems (including systems of 'hot Neptunes' and 'super-Earths') whose angular momentum vectors are misaligned with respect to their host stars will be commensurate with the rate of primordial stellar multiplicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11560

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If spin-orbit misalignments are primarily caused by primordial misalignment of the disk, we would expect small planets and flat multi-planet systems to be misaligned around hot stars as well.

    “If spin-orbit misalignments are primarily caused by primordial misalignment of the disk (e.g., Batygin 2012), we would expect small planets and flat multi-planet systems to be misaligned around hot stars as well.”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Batygin 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [32]32. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., Flannery, B. P. 1992. Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: University Press, -c1992, 2nd ed. .
  2. [33]33. Binney, J., Tremaine, S. 1987. Galactic dynamics. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987, 747 p. .
  3. [35]35. Kozai, Y. 1962. Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. The Astronomical Journal 67, 591.
  4. [37]37. Goldreich, P., Tremaine, S. 1980. Disk-satellite interactions. The Astrophysical Journal 241, 425-441.
  5. [39]39. Lithwick, Y., Wu, Y. 2011. Theory of Secular Chaos and Mercury's Orbit. The Astrophysical Journal 739, 31.
  6. [40]40. Hahn, J. M. 2003. The Secular Evolution of the Primordial Kuiper Belt. The Astrophysical Journal 595, 531549.
  7. [41]41. Levison, H. F., Morbidelli, A. 2007. Models of the collisional damping scenario for ice-giant planets and Kuiper belt formation. Icarus 189, 196-212. This 2-column preprint was prepared with the AAS L A T E X macros v5.2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batygin, K.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Batygin, Konstantin
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-11
Volume
491
Issue
7424
Pages
418-420
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2040091043
Cited by
345
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 19
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
hot Jupiters, orbital misalignment, binary stars, protoplanetary disks, Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, stellar multiplicity, gravitational perturbations, planet migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review