Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 670

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An eclipsing-binary distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud accurate to two per cent

Open access
Pietrzyński, G., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., Thompson, I. B., Pilecki, B., Udalski, A., Soszyński, I., Kozłowski, S., Konorski, P., Suchomska, K., Bono, G., Moroni, P. G. Prada, Villanova, S., Nardetto, N., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R. P., Storm, J., Gallenne, A., Smolec, R., Minniti, D., Kubiak, M., Szymański, M. K., Poleski, R., Wyrzykowski, Ł., Ulaczyk, K., Pietrukowicz, P., Górski, M., Karczmarek, P.·2013·Nature

Abstract

In the era of precision cosmology, it is essential to determine the Hubble constant to an accuracy of three per cent or better. At present, its uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty in the distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), which, being our second-closest galaxy, serves as the best anchor point for the cosmic distance scale. Observations of eclipsing binaries offer a unique opportunity to measure stellar parameters and distances precisely and accurately. The eclipsing-binary method was previously applied to the LMC, but the accuracy of the distance results was lessened by the need to model the bright, early-type systems used in those studies. Here we report determinations of the distances to eight long-period, late-type eclipsing systems in the LMC, composed of cool, giant stars. For these systems, we can accurately measure both the linear and the angular sizes of their components and avoid the most important problems related to the hot, early-type systems. The LMC distance that we derive from these systems (49.97 ± 0.19 (statistical) ± 1.11 (systematic) kiloparsecs) is accurate to 2.2 per cent and provides a firm base for a 3-per-cent determination of the Hubble constant, with prospects for improvement to 2 per cent in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11878

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 670

Metadata

Authors
Pietrzyński, G., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., Thompson, I. B., Pilecki, B., Udalski, A., Soszyński, I., Kozłowski, S., Konorski, P., Suchomska, K., Bono, G., Moroni, P. G. P., Villanova, S., Nardetto, N., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R. P., Storm, J., Gallenne, A., Smolec, R., Minniti, D., Kubiak, M., Szymański, M. K., Poleski, R., Wyrzykowski, Ł., Ulaczyk, K., Pietrukowicz, P., Górski, M., & Karczmarek, P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-03
Volume
495
Issue
7439
Pages
76-79
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2040481510
Cited by
670
References
0
FWCI
36.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An eclipsing-binary distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud accurate to two per cent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11878
The paper
Pietrzyński, G., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., Thompson, I. B., Pilecki, B., Udalski, A., Soszyński, I., Kozłowski, S., Konorski, P., Suchomska, K., Bono, G., Moroni, P. G. P., Villanova, S., Nardetto, N., Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R. P., Storm, J., Gallenne, A., Smolec, R., . . . Karczmarek, P. (2013). An eclipsing-binary distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud accurate to two per cent. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.