Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pleistocene cave art from Sulawesi, Indonesia

Aubert, M., Brumm, A., Ramli, M., Sutikna, T., Saptomo, E. W., Hakim, B., Morwood, M. J., van den Bergh, G. D., Kinsley, L., Dosseto, A.·2014·Nature

Abstract

Archaeologists have long been puzzled by the appearance in Europe ∼40-35 thousand years (kyr) ago of a rich corpus of sophisticated artworks, including parietal art (that is, paintings, drawings and engravings on immobile rock surfaces) and portable art (for example, carved figurines), and the absence or scarcity of equivalent, well-dated evidence elsewhere, especially along early human migration routes in South Asia and the Far East, including Wallacea and Australia, where modern humans (Homo sapiens) were established by 50 kyr ago. Here, using uranium-series dating of coralloid speleothems directly associated with 12 human hand stencils and two figurative animal depictions from seven cave sites in the Maros karsts of Sulawesi, we show that rock art traditions on this Indonesian island are at least compatible in age with the oldest European art. The earliest dated image from Maros, with a minimum age of 39.9 kyr, is now the oldest known hand stencil in the world. In addition, a painting of a babirusa ('pig-deer') made at least 35.4 kyr ago is among the earliest dated figurative depictions worldwide, if not the earliest one. Among the implications, it can now be demonstrated that humans were producing rock art by ∼40 kyr ago at opposite ends of the Pleistocene Eurasian world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13422

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sulawesi has been the focus of many archaeological excavations since the 1960s and has received increasing attention recently, with some of the oldest dates (ca. 40.7 ka) for early modern human occupation in Wallacea located just south of the modeled path.

    “Sulawesi has been the focus of many archaeological excavations since the 1960s (O'Connor and Bulbeck, 2014;Brumm et al., 2017;Bulbeck et al., in press), and has received an increasing amount of attention recently with some of the oldest dates (ca.40.7 ka) for early modern human occupation in Wallacea located just south of our modeled path (SOM Fig. S1; Aubert et al., 2014)”

    From Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul (2018) · cites this paper as Aubert et al., 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Lewis-Williams, D. J. The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origins Of Art (Thames & Hudson, 2002)
  2. White, R. et al. Context and dating of Aurignacian vulvar representations from Abri Castanet, France. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8450–8455 (2012) · DOI
  3. Dowson, T. A. & Porr, M. in The Archaeology of Shamanism (ed. Price, N. ) 165–177 (Routledge, 2001)
  4. Aubert, M. A review of rock art dating in the Kimberley, Western Australia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 573–577 (2012) · DOI
  5. Brumm, A. & Moore, M. W. Symbolic revolutions and the Australian archaeological record. Camb. Archaeol. J. 15, 157–175 (2005) · DOI
  6. Langley, M. C., Clarkson, C. & Ulm, S. From small holes to grand narratives: the impact of taphonomy and sample size on the modernity debate in Australia and New Guinea. J. Hum. Evol. 61, 197–208 (2011) · DOI
  7. Roberts, R. G., Jones, R. & Smith, M. Thermoluminescence dating of a 50,000-year-old human occupation site in northern Australia. Nature 345, 153–156 (1990) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Roberts, R. G. et al. The human colonisation of Australia: optical dates of 53,000 and 60,000 years bracket human arrival at Deaf Adder Gorge, Northern Territory. Quat. Sci. Rev. 13, 575–583 (1994) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Pike, A. W. G. et al. U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science 336, 1409–1413 (2012) · DOI
  10. McDonald, R. C. Limestone morphology in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Z. Geomorphol. 26 (suppl.). 79–91 (1976)
  11. Glover, I. C. Leang Burung 2: an Upper Palaeolithic rock shelter in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Mod. Quat. Res. SE Asia 6, 1–38 (1981)
  12. Glover, I. C. The effects of sink action on archaeological deposits in caves: an Indonesian example. World Archaeol. 10, 302–317 (1979) · DOI
  13. van Heekeren, H. R. Rock-paintings and other prehistoric discoveries near Maros (South West Celebes). Laporan Tahunan Dinas Purbakala 1950, 22–35 (1952)
  14. Bulbeck, D., Pasqua, M. & Di Lello, A. Culture history of the Toalean of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Asian Perspect. 39, 71–108 (2000) · DOI
  15. Bulbeck, D., Sumantri, I. & Hiscock, P. Leang Sakapao 1, a second dated Pleistocene site from South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Mod. Quat. Res. SE Asia 18, 111–128 (2004)
  16. Eriawati, Y. Lukisan di Gua-Gua Karst Maros–Pangkep, Sulawesi Selatan: Gambaran Penghuni dan Matapencahariannya (Indonesian Ministry of Cultural Media Development, 2003)
  17. O’Connor, S. Nine new painted rock art sites from East Timor in the context of the Western Pacific region. Asian Perspect. 42, 96–128 (2003) · DOI
  18. Simanjuntak, T. Austronesian in Sulawesi (Center for Prehistoric and Austronesian Studies, 2008)
  19. Hill, C. A. & Forti, P. Cave Minerals of the World (National Speleological Society, 1997)
  20. Fage, L. H. & Chazine, J. M. Bornéo la Mémoire des Grottes (Fage éditions, 2009)
  21. Plagnes, V. et al. Cross dating (Th/U–14C) of calcite covering prehistoric paintings in Borneo. Quat. Res. 60, 172–179 (2003) · DOI
  22. Taçon, P. S. C. & Tan, N. H. in Rock Art News of the World 4 (eds Bahn, P., Franklin, N. & Strecker, M. ) 207–214 (Oxbow Books, 2012)
  23. Chaloupka, G. Journey in Time, the World’s Longest Continuing Art Tradition: The 50,000-year Story of the Australian Aboriginal Rock Art of Arnhem Land (Reed, 1993)
  24. Morwood, M. J. Visions from the Past: The Archaeology of Australian Aboriginal Art (Allen & Unwin, 2002)
  25. David, B. et al. How old are Australia’s pictographs? A review of rock art dating. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 3–10 (2013) · DOI
  26. García-Diez, M. et al. Uranium series dating reveals a long sequence of rock art at Altamira Cave (Santillana del Mar, Cantabria). J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 4098–4106 (2013) · DOI
  27. Valladas, H. et al. Bilan des datations carbone 14 effectuées sur des charbons de bois de la grotte Chauvet. Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr. 102, 109–113 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Combier, J. & Jouve, G. Nouvelles recherches sur l’identité culturelle et stylistique de la grotte Chauvet et sur sa datation par la méthode du 14C. L’anthropologie 118, 115–151 (2014) · DOI
  29. Bourdon, B., Henderson, G. M., Lundstrom, C. C. & Turner, S. P. Uranium-series Geochemistry (Mineralogical Society of America, 2003) · DOI
  30. McCulloch, M. T. & Esat, T. The coral record of last interglacial sea levels and sea surface temperatures. Chem. Geol. 169, 107–129 (2000) · DOI
  31. McCulloch, M. T. & Mortimer, G. E. Applications of the 238U–230Th decay series to dating of fossil and modern corals using MC-ICPMS. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 55, 955–965 (2008) · DOI
  32. Cheng, H., Adkins, J., Edwards, R. & Boyle, E. U–Th dating of deep-sea corals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 2401–2416 (2000) · DOI
  33. Leclerc, P. in Expédition Thaï-Maros 86 147–153 (Association Pyrénéenne de Spéléologie, 1987)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aubert, M., Brumm, A., Ramli, M., Sutikna, T., Saptomo, E. W., Hakim, B., Morwood, M. J., van den Bergh, G. D., Kinsley, L., & Dosseto, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-10
Volume
514
Issue
7521
Pages
223-227
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
414
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review