Cited by 270Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

Palaeolithic ivory sculptures from southwestern Germany and the origins of figurative art

Conard, Nicholas J.·2003·Nature

Abstract

Archaeologists have always viewed the origin of figurative art as a crucial threshold in human evolution. Here I report the discovery of three figurines carved from mammoth ivory at Hohle Fels Cave in the Swabian Jura of southwestern Germany, which provides new evidence for the appearance of figurative art more than 30,000 years ago. The finds include the oldest known representation of a bird, a therianthropic sculpture and an animal that most closely resembles a horse. The Aurignacian sculptures of the Swabian Jura belong to one of the oldest traditions of figurative art known worldwide and point to the Upper Danube as an important centre of cultural innovation during the early Upper Palaeolithic period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature02186

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stylistic similarities between the two lion men may point to a continuing cultural tradition.

    “In spite of the chronological gap, these stylistic similarities are remarkable and may point to a continuing cultural tradition (Conard, 2003).”

    From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Conard, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conard, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Conard, Nicholas J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-12
Volume
426
Issue
6968
Pages
830-832
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2091859378
Cited by
270
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
56.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
Swabian Jura, Aurignacian, horse depiction, Upper Palaeolithic, Upper Danube, cultural innovation, human evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Archaeology, Birds, Cultural Evolution, Biological Evolution, Germany, Horses, Humans, Sculpture, Hominidae, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review