The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms
Open accessAbstract
About 300 experiments have tried to determine the value of the Newtonian gravitational constant, G, so far, but large discrepancies in the results have made it impossible to know its value precisely. The weakness of the gravitational interaction and the impossibility of shielding the effects of gravity make it very difficult to measure G while keeping systematic effects under control. Most previous experiments performed were based on the torsion pendulum or torsion balance scheme as in the experiment by Cavendish in 1798, and in all cases macroscopic masses were used. Here we report the precise determination of G using laser-cooled atoms and quantum interferometry. We obtain the value G = 6.67191(99) × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2 with a relative uncertainty of 150 parts per million (the combined standard uncertainty is given in parentheses). Our value differs by 1.5 combined standard deviations from the current recommended value of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. A conceptually different experiment such as ours helps to identify the systematic errors that have proved elusive in previous experiments, thus improving the confidence in the value of G. There is no definitive relationship between G and the other fundamental constants, and there is no theoretical prediction for its value, against which to test experimental results. Improving the precision with which we know G has not only a pure metrological interest, but is also important because of the key role that G has in theories of gravitation, cosmology, particle physics and astrophysics and in geophysical models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rosi, G., D’Amico, G., Cacciapuoti, L., Sorrentino, F., Prevedelli, M., Zych, M., Brukner, Č., & Tino, G. M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15529 · Cited by 217
Self-citationPrecision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant
Xue, C., Liu, J.-P., Li, Q., Wu, J.-F., Yang, S.-Q., Liu, Q., Shao, C.-G., Tu, L.-C., Hu, Z.-K., & Luo, J. (2020) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa165 · Cited by 60
Stability enhancement by joint phase measurements in a single cold atomic fountain
Meunier, M., Dutta, I., Geiger, R., Guerlin, C., Garrido Alzar, C. L., & Landragin, A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063633 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosi, G., Sorrentino, F., Cacciapuoti, L., Prevedelli, M., & Tino, G. M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 510
- Issue
- 7506
- Pages
- 518-521
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1975360381
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature13433
- The paper
- Rosi, G., Sorrentino, F., Cacciapuoti, L., Prevedelli, M., & Tino, G. M. (2014). Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.