Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements

Open access
Sun, L., Petrenko, A., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Sliwa, K. M., Narla, A., Hatridge, M., Shankar, S., Blumoff, J., Frunzio, L., Mirrahimi, M., Devoret, M. H., Schoelkopf, R. J.·2014·Nature

Abstract

Quantum error correction is required for a practical quantum computer because of the fragile nature of quantum information. In quantum error correction, information is redundantly stored in a large quantum state space and one or more observables must be monitored to reveal the occurrence of an error, without disturbing the information encoded in an unknown quantum state. Such observables, typically multi-quantum-bit parities, must correspond to a special symmetry property inherent in the encoding scheme. Measurements of these observables, or error syndromes, must also be performed in a quantum non-demolition way (projecting without further perturbing the state) and more quickly than errors occur. Previously, quantum non-demolition measurements of quantum jumps between states of well-defined energy have been performed in systems such as trapped ions, electrons, cavity quantum electrodynamics, nitrogen–vacancy centres and superconducting quantum bits. So far, however, no fast and repeated monitoring of an error syndrome has been achieved. Here we track the quantum jumps of a possible error syndrome, namely the photon number parity of a microwave cavity, by mapping this property onto an ancilla quantum bit, whose only role is to facilitate quantum state manipulation and measurement. This quantity is just the error syndrome required in a recently proposed scheme for a hardware-efficient protected quantum memory using Schrödinger cat states (quantum superpositions of different coherent states of light) in a harmonic oscillator. We demonstrate the projective nature of this measurement onto a region of state space with well-defined parity by observing the collapse of a coherent state onto even or odd cat states. The measurement is fast compared with the cavity lifetime, has a high single-shot fidelity and has a 99.8 per cent probability per single measurement of leaving the parity unchanged. In combination with the deterministic encoding of quantum information in cat states realized earlier, the quantum non-demolition parity tracking that we demonstrate represents an important step towards implementing an active system that extends the lifetime of a quantum bit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13436

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Bergquist, J. C., Hulet, R. G., Itano, W. M. & Wineland, D. J. Observation of quantum jumps in a single atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1699–1702 (1986) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Gleyzes, S. et al. Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity. Nature 446, 297–300 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Guerlin, C. et al. Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. Nature 448, 889–893 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jelezko, F. et al. Single spin states in a defect center resolved by optical spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2160–2162 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Neumann, P. et al. Single-shot readout of a single nuclear spin. Science 329, 542–544 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Robledo, L. et al. High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register. Nature 477, 574–578 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H. & Siddiqi, I. Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110502 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hatridge, M. et al. Quantum back-action of an individual variable-strength measurement. Science 339, 178–181 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Leghtas, Z. et al. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120501 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Leghtas, Z. et al. Deterministic protocol for mapping a qubit to coherent state superposition in a cavity. Phys. Rev. A 87, 042315 (2013) · DOI
  11. Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrödinger cat states. Science 342, 607–610 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deléglise, S. et al. Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence. Nature 455, 510–514 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sayrin, C. et al. Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states. Nature 477, 73–77 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Devoret, M. H. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169–1174 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Irwin, K. D., Hilton, G. C., Vale, L. R. & Lehnert, K. W. Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial. Nature Phys. 4, 929–931 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bergeal, N. et al. Phase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator. Nature 465, 64–68 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ristè, D. et al. Deterministic entanglement of superconducting qubits by parity measurement and feedback. Nature 502, 350–354 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  18. Haroche, S. & Raimond, J. M. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kirchmair, G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon Kerr effect. Nature 495, 205–209 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kamal, A., Marblestone, A. & Devoret, M. H. Signal-to-pump back action and self-oscillation in double-pump Josephson parametric amplifier. Phys. Rev. B 79, 184301 (2009) · DOI
  22. Murch, K. W., Weber, S. J., Macklin, C. & Siddiqi, I. Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit. Nature 502, 211–214 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  23. Schuster, D. I. et al. Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit. Nature 445, 515–518 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  24. Bertet, P. et al. Direct measurement of the Wigner function of a one-photon Fock state in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200402 (2002) · DOI · Paper page
  25. Brune, M., Haroche, S., Raimond, J. M., Davidovich, L. & Zagury, N. Manipulation of photons in a cavity by dispersive atom-field coupling: Quantum-nondemolition measurements and generation of “Schrödinger” cat states. Phys. Rev. A 45, 5193–5214 (1992) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Brune, M. et al. Observing the progressive decoherence of the “meter” in a quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4887–4890 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  27. Reagor, M. et al. Ten milliseconds for aluminum cavities in the quantum regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192604 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  28. Siddiqi, I. et al. Direct observation of dynamical bifurcation between two driven oscillation states of a Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 027005 (2005) · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.027005
  29. Vijay, R., Devoret, M. H. & Siddiqi, I. The Josephson bifurcation amplifier. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 111101 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
  30. Belavkin, V. P. Quantum stochastic calculus and quantum nonlinear filtering. J. Multivariate Anal. 42, 171–201 (1992) · doi:10.1016/0047-259x(92)90042-e
  31. Bouten, L., van Handel, R. & James, M. An introduction to quantum filtering. SIAM J. Contr. Optim. 46, 2199–2241 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mirrahimi, M. et al. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. Phys. 16, 045014 (2014)

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Sun, L., Petrenko, A., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Sliwa, K. M., Narla, A., Hatridge, M., Shankar, S., Blumoff, J., Frunzio, L., Mirrahimi, M., Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-07
Volume
511
Issue
7510
Pages
444-448
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2019229746
Cited by
264
References
3
FWCI
24.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature13436
The paper
Sun, L., Petrenko, A., Leghtas, Z., Vlastakis, B., Kirchmair, G., Sliwa, K. M., Narla, A., Hatridge, M., Shankar, S., Blumoff, J., Frunzio, L., Mirrahimi, M., Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2014). Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.