Cited by 18Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Bias towards large genes in autism

Shohat, Shahar, Shifman, Sagiv·2014·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13583

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shohat, S., & Shifman, S.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Shifman, Sagiv
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-08-06
Volume
512
Issue
7512
Pages
E1-E2
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2054624682
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, copy number variation, candidate genes, gene expression, methodological bias
MeSH terms
Animals, Autistic Disorder, DNA Topoisomerases, Type I, Humans, Transcription Elongation, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review