The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstruction and control of a time-dependent two-electron wave packet
Open accessAbstract
The concerted motion of two or more bound electrons governs atomic and molecular non-equilibrium processes including chemical reactions, and hence there is much interest in developing a detailed understanding of such electron dynamics in the quantum regime. However, there is no exact solution for the quantum three-body problem, and as a result even the minimal system of two active electrons and a nucleus is analytically intractable. This makes experimental measurements of the dynamics of two bound and correlated electrons, as found in the helium atom, an attractive prospect. However, although the motion of single active electrons and holes has been observed with attosecond time resolution, comparable experiments on two-electron motion have so far remained out of reach. Here we show that a correlated two-electron wave packet can be reconstructed from a 1.2-femtosecond quantum beat among low-lying doubly excited states in helium. The beat appears in attosecond transient-absorption spectra measured with unprecedentedly high spectral resolution and in the presence of an intensity-tunable visible laser field. We tune the coupling between the two low-lying quantum states by adjusting the visible laser intensity, and use the Fano resonance as a phase-sensitive quantum interferometer to achieve coherent control of the two correlated electrons. Given the excellent agreement with large-scale quantum-mechanical calculations for the helium atom, we anticipate that multidimensional spectroscopy experiments of the type we report here will provide benchmark data for testing fundamental few-body quantum dynamics theory in more complex systems. They might also provide a route to the site-specific measurement and control of metastable electronic transition states that are at the heart of fundamental chemical reactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recent experiments have addressed correlated two-electron dynamics [169], attosecond to few-femtosecond charge migration in molecules [170, 171] and electric field-induced charge separation in solids [172].”
From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [169]
Citations
Cites
Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts
Fano, U. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.1866 · Cited by 11,263
Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M., & Davis, J. C. (1993) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1006/adnd.1993.1013 · Cited by 6,386
Krausz, F., & Ivanov, M. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.163 · Cited by 5,468
Observation of a Train of Attosecond Pulses from High Harmonic Generation
Paul, P. M., Toma, E. S., Breger, P., Mullot, G., Augé, F., Balcou, P., Muller, H. G., & Agostini, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059413 · Cited by 2,801
The multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree approach
Meyer, H., Manthe, U., & Cederbaum, L. S. (1990) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(90)87014-i · Cited by 2,039
Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes
Ullrich, J., Moshammer, R., Dorn, A., rner, R. D., Schmidt, L. P. H., & cking, H. S.-B. (2003) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/9/203 · Cited by 1,864
Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback-Optimized Phase-Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses
Assion, A., Baumert, T., Bergt, M., Brixner, T., Kiefer, B., Seyfried, V., Strehle, M. A., & Gerber, G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5390.919 · Cited by 1,632
Real-time observation of valence electron motion
Goulielmakis, E., Loh, Z.-H., Wirth, A., Santra, R., Rohringer, N., Yakovlev, V. S., Zherebtsov, S., Pfeifer, T., Azzeer, A. M., Kling, M. F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09212 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citationComplex Coordinates in the Theory of Atomic and Molecular Structure and Dynamics
Reinhardt, W. P. (1982) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.33.100182.001255 · Cited by 914
Laser ionization of noble gases by Coulomb-barrier suppression
Augst, S. J., Meyerhofer, D. D., Strickland, D. T., & Chint, S. L. (1991) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.8.000858 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Лимонов, М. Ф., Рыбин, М. В., Poddubny, A. N., & Kivshar, Y. S. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.142 · Cited by 1,969
X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation
Attwood, D. T., & Sakdinawat, A. E. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107477629 · Cited by 758
Attosecond Electron Dynamics in Molecules
Nisoli, M., Decleva, P., Calegari, F., Palacios, A., & Martín, F. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00453 · Cited by 572
Self-citationAdvances in attosecond science
Calegari, F., Sansone, G., Stagira, S., Vozzi, C., & Nisoli, M. (2016) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/6/062001 · Cited by 503
Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission
Pazourek, R., Nagele, S., & Burgdörfer, J. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.765 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Ott, C., Kaldun, A., Argenti, L., Raith, P., Meyer, K., Laux, M., Zhang, Y., Blättermann, A., Hagstotz, S., Ding, T., Heck, R., Madroñero, J., Martín, F., & Pfeifer, T.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (DE)
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pfeifer, Thomas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 516
- Issue
- 7531
- Pages
- 374-378
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2057758931
- Semantic Scholar
- 85a9fdb2023d6ad1b8ff4d91a521251943cb980c
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Hispana (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- helium atom, doubly excited states, quantum beats, attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, Fano resonance, quantum interference, coherent control, electron correlation, multidimensional spectroscopy, attosecond spectroscopy, few-cycle laser fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review