Cited by 147Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesAtomic and Molecular PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio

Open access
Ulmer, S., Smorra, C., Mooser, A., Franke, K., Nagahama, H., Schneider, G., Higuchi, T., Van Gorp, S. +5 more·2015·Nature

Abstract

The CPT theorem (the assumption that physical laws are invariant under simultaneous charge conjugation, parity transformation and time reversal) is central to the standard model of particle physics; here the charge-to-mass ratio of the antiproton is compared to that of the proton, with a precision of 69 parts per trillion, and the result supports the CPT theorem at the atto-electronvolt scale. The CPT theorem, the assumption that physical laws are invariant under simultaneous charge conjugation, parity transformation and time reversal, is central to the standard model of particle physics. Consequently, precision tests of the CPT theorem are a window onto the physics beyond the standard model. Here, Stefan Ulmer et al. test the CPT theorem by measuring whether particles and antiparticles, apart from a sign change, are identical. In a Penning-trap measurement, they compare the antiproton charge-to-mass ratio to its proton counterpart, showing that the CPT theorem holds at the atto-electronvolt scale. Their experiment improves the precision of previous proton–antiproton mass comparisons by a factor of four. Invariance under the charge, parity, time-reversal (CPT) transformation1 is one of the fundamental symmetries of the standard model of particle physics. This CPT invariance implies that the fundamental properties of antiparticles and their matter-conjugates are identical, apart from signs. There is a deep link between CPT invariance and Lorentz symmetry—that is, the laws of nature seem to be invariant under the symmetry transformation of spacetime—although it is model dependent2. A number of high-precision CPT and Lorentz invariance tests—using a co-magnetometer, a torsion pendulum and a maser, among others—have been performed3, but only a few direct high-precision CPT tests that compare the fundamental properties of matter and antimatter are available4,5,6,7,8. Here we report high-precision cyclotron frequency comparisons of a single antiproton and a negatively charged hydrogen ion (H−) carried out in a Penning trap system. From 13,000 frequency measurements we compare the charge-to-mass ratio for the antiproton to that for the proton and obtain . The measurements were performed at cyclotron frequencies of 29.6 megahertz, so our result shows that the CPT theorem holds at the atto-electronvolt scale. Our precision of 69 parts per trillion exceeds the energy resolution of previous antiproton-to-proton mass comparisons7,9 as well as the respective figure of merit of the standard model extension10 by a factor of four. In addition, we give a limit on sidereal variations in the measured ratio of <720 parts per trillion. By following the arguments of ref. 11, our result can be interpreted as a stringent test of the weak equivalence principle of general relativity using baryonic antimatter, and it sets a new limit on the gravitational anomaly parameter of < 8.7 × 10−7.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penning traps are a well-established tool for precision spectroscopy with small numbers of ions.

    “Penning traps are a well-established tool for precision spectroscopy with small numbers of ions25–28”

    From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 147

Authors
Ulmer, S., Smorra, C., Mooser, A., Franke, K., Nagahama, H., Schneider, G., Higuchi, T., Van Gorp, S., Blaum, K., Matsuda, Y., Quint, W., Walz, J., & Yamazaki, Y.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (DE)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Ulmer, S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-08
Volume
524
Issue
7564
Pages
196-199
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2145389830
Cited by
147
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • International Linear Collider (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • GSI Repository (German Federal Government) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GSI Repository (German Federal Government)
Funders
  • CERN
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (24000008)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24000008)
  • RIKEN (24000008)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (290870)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
CPT symmetry, charge-to-mass ratio, antiprotons, protons, Penning trap, negative hydrogen ion, Lorentz invariance, antimatter, matter-antimatter symmetry, beyond the Standard Model, time-reversal symmetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review