The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins
Open accessAbstract
The battle for survival between bacteria and the viruses that infect them (phages) has led to the evolution of many bacterial defence systems and phage-encoded antagonists of these systems. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and the CRISPR-associated (cas) genes comprise an adaptive immune system that is one of the most widespread means by which bacteria defend themselves against phages. We identified the first examples of proteins produced by phages that inhibit a CRISPR–Cas system. Here we performed biochemical and in vivo investigations of three of these anti-CRISPR proteins, and show that each inhibits CRISPR–Cas activity through a distinct mechanism. Two block the DNA-binding activity of the CRISPR–Cas complex, yet do this by interacting with different protein subunits, and using steric or non-steric modes of inhibition. The third anti-CRISPR protein operates by binding to the Cas3 helicase–nuclease and preventing its recruitment to the DNA-bound CRISPR–Cas complex. In vivo, this anti-CRISPR can convert the CRISPR–Cas system into a transcriptional repressor, providing the first example—to our knowledge—of modulation of CRISPR–Cas activity by a protein interactor. The diverse sequences and mechanisms of action of these anti-CRISPR proteins imply an independent evolution, and foreshadow the existence of other means by which proteins may alter CRISPR–Cas function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence
Moradali, M. F., Ghods, S., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039 · Cited by 1,537
Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008 · Cited by 1,423
Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems
Shmakov, S., Smargon, A., Scott, D., Cox, D., Pyzocha, N., Yan, W., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.184 · Cited by 1,029
Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering
Wright, A. V., Nuñez, J. K., & Doudna, J. A. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035 · Cited by 989
A cyclic oligonucleotide signaling pathway in type III CRISPR-Cas systems
Kazlauskiene, M., Kostiuk, G., Venclovas, Č., Tamulaitis, G., & Siksnys, V. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao0100 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Bondy-Denomy, J., Garcia, B., Strum, S., Du, M., Rollins, M. F., Hidalgo-Reyes, Y., Wiedenheft, B., Maxwell, K. L., & Davidson, A. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-09-23
- Volume
- 526
- Issue
- 7571
- Pages
- 136-139
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2186989880
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature15254
- The paper
- Bondy-Denomy, J., Garcia, B., Strum, S., Du, M., Rollins, M. F., Hidalgo-Reyes, Y., Wiedenheft, B., Maxwell, K. L., & Davidson, A. R. (2015). Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR–Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.