The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering
Abstract
Bacteria and archaea possess a range of defense mechanisms to combat plasmids and viral infections. Unique among these are the CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated) systems, which provide adaptive immunity against foreign nucleic acids. CRISPR systems function by acquiring genetic records of invaders to facilitate robust interference upon reinfection. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the diverse mechanisms by which Cas proteins respond to foreign nucleic acids and how these systems have been harnessed for precision genome manipulation in a wide array of organisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies suggest different classifications of CRISPR-Cas systems, with two classes and five or most recently six types having been described.
“Recent studies suggest different classifications, with two classes and five [14] or most recently six types of CRISPR-Cas systems [15] having been described.”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Self-citationMultiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9
Ran, F. A., Cong, L., Yan, W. X., Scott, D. A., Gootenberg, J. S., Kriz, A. J., Zetsche, B., Shalem, O., Wu, X., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14299 · Cited by 2,687
CRISPR RNA Maturation by Trans-Encoded Small RNA and Host Factor RNase III
Deltcheva, E., Chylinski, K., Sharma, C. M., Gonzales, K., Chao, Y., Pirzada, Z. A., Eckert, M. R., Vogel, J., & Charpentier, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09886 · Cited by 2,563
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2508 · Cited by 2,429
Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA
Nishimasu, H., Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Konermann, S., Shehata, S. I., Dohmae, N., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001 · Cited by 2,306
Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation
Jinek, M., Jiang, F., Taylor, D. W., Sternberg, S. H., Kaya, E., Ma, E., Anders, C., Hauer, M., Zhou, K., Lin, S., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247997 · Cited by 1,230
Self-citationMaruyama, T., Dougan, S. K., Truttmann, M. C., Bilate, A. M., Ingram, J. R., & Ploegh, H. L. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3190 · Cited by 1,137
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 155
- Anders, 2014, Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease, Nature, 513, 569, 10.1038/nature13579 · DOI · Paper page
- Arslan, 2013, Double-strand DNA end-binding and sliding of the toroidal CRISPR-associated protein Csn2, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 6347, 10.1093/nar/gkt315 · DOI
- Arslan, 2014, Detection and characterization of spacer integration intermediates in type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 7884, 10.1093/nar/gku510 · DOI
- Barrangou, 2007, CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes, Science, 315, 1709, 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
- Blackwood, 2013, End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 41, 314, 10.1042/BST20120307 · DOI
- Blosser, 2015, Two distinct DNA binding modes guide dual roles of a CRISPR-Cas protein complex, Mol. Cell, 58, 60, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.028 · DOI
- Blundell, 2014, Beyond genome sequencing: Lineage tracking with barcodes to study the dynamics of evolution, infection, and cancer, Genomics, 104, 417, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.09.005 · DOI
- Bolotin, 2005, Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin, Microbiology, 151, 2551, 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Bondy-Denomy, 2014, To acquire or resist: the complex biological effects of CRISPR-Cas systems, Trends Microbiol., 22, 218, 10.1016/j.tim.2014.01.007 · DOI
- Bondy-Denomy, 2013, Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system, Nature, 493, 429, 10.1038/nature11723 · DOI
- Bondy-Denomy, 2015, Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR-Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins, Nature, 526, 136, 10.1038/nature15254 · DOI
- Borchardt, 2015, Controlling mRNA stability and translation with the CRISPR endoribonuclease Csy4, RNA, 21, 1921, 10.1261/rna.051227.115 · DOI
- Brendel, 2014, A complex of Cas proteins 5, 6, and 7 is required for the biogenesis and stability of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (crispr)-derived rnas (crrnas) in Haloferax volcanii, J. Biol. Chem., 289, 7164, 10.1074/jbc.M113.508184 · DOI
- Briner, 2014, Guide RNA functional modules direct Cas9 activity and orthogonality, Mol. Cell, 56, 333, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.019 · DOI
- Brouns, 2008, Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes, Science, 321, 960, 10.1126/science.1159689 · DOI · Paper page
- Bryson, 2015, Covalent Modification of Bacteriophage T4 DNA Inhibits CRISPR-Cas9, MBio, 6, e00648, 10.1128/mBio.00648-15 · DOI
- Carte, 2008, Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes, Genes Dev., 22, 3489, 10.1101/gad.1742908 · DOI
- Charpentier, 2015, Biogenesis pathways of RNA guides in archaeal and bacterial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 39, 428, 10.1093/femsre/fuv023 · DOI
- Chow, 1992, Reversal of integration and DNA splicing mediated by integrase of human immunodeficiency virus, Science, 255, 723, 10.1126/science.1738845 · DOI
- Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 543, 10.1038/nbt.3198 · DOI · Paper page
- Chylinski, 2014, Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 6091, 10.1093/nar/gku241 · DOI · Paper page
- D’Astolfo, 2015, Efficient intracellular delivery of native proteins, Cell, 161, 674, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.028 · DOI · Paper page
- Datsenko, 2012, Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system, Nat. Commun., 3, 945, 10.1038/ncomms1937 · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, 2015, Small molecule-triggered Cas9 protein with improved genome-editing specificity, Nat. Chem. Biol., 11, 316, 10.1038/nchembio.1793 · DOI
- Deng, 2013, A novel interference mechanism by a type IIIB CRISPR-Cmr module in Sulfolobus, Mol. Microbiol., 87, 1088, 10.1111/mmi.12152 · DOI
- Deveau, 2008, Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus, J. Bacteriol., 190, 1390, 10.1128/JB.01412-07 · DOI
- Díez-Villaseñor, 2013, CRISPR-spacer integration reporter plasmids reveal distinct genuine acquisition specificities among CRISPR-Cas I-E variants of Escherichia coli, RNA Biol., 10, 792, 10.4161/rna.24023 · DOI
- Dillingham, 2008, RecBCD enzyme and the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 72, 642, 10.1128/MMBR.00020-08 · DOI
- Du, 2015, Engineering translational activators with CRISPR-Cas system, ACS Synth. Biol.
- Dugar, 2013, High-resolution transcriptome maps reveal strain-specific regulatory features of multiple Campylobacter jejuni isolates, PLoS Genet., 9, e1003495, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003495 · DOI
- Ellinger, 2012, The crystal structure of the CRISPR-associated protein Csn2 from Streptococcus agalactiae, J. Struct. Biol., 178, 350, 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.04.006 · DOI
- Engelman, 1991, HIV-1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer, Cell, 67, 1211, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90297-C · DOI · Paper page
- Garrett, 2015, CRISPR-Cas Adaptive Immune Systems of the Sulfolobales: Unravelling Their Complexity and Diversity, Life (Basel), 5, 783
- Garside, 2012, Cas5d processes pre-crRNA and is a member of a larger family of CRISPR RNA endonucleases, RNA, 18, 2020, 10.1261/rna.033100.112 · DOI
- Gasiunas, 2012, Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, E2579, 10.1073/pnas.1208507109 · DOI · Paper page
- Gesner, 2011, Recognition and maturation of effector RNAs in a CRISPR interference pathway, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, 688, 10.1038/nsmb.2042 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldberg, 2014, Conditional tolerance of temperate phages via transcription-dependent CRISPR-Cas targeting, Nature, 514, 633, 10.1038/nature13637 · DOI
- Gong, 2014, Molecular insights into DNA interference by CRISPR-associated nuclease-helicase Cas3, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 16359, 10.1073/pnas.1410806111 · DOI
- Gori, 2015, Delivery and Specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Technologies for Human Gene Therapy, Hum. Gene Ther., 26, 443, 10.1089/hum.2015.074 · DOI
- Hale, 2008, Prokaryotic silencing (psi)RNAs in Pyrococcus furiosus, RNA, 14, 2572, 10.1261/rna.1246808 · DOI
- Hale, 2009, RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex, Cell, 139, 945, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
- Haurwitz, 2010, Sequence- and structure-specific RNA processing by a CRISPR endonuclease, Science, 329, 1355, 10.1126/science.1192272 · DOI
- Heler, 2015, Cas9 specifies functional viral targets during CRISPR-Cas adaptation, Nature, 519, 199, 10.1038/nature14245 · DOI
- Hochstrasser, 2015, Cutting it close: CRISPR-associated endoribonuclease structure and function, Trends Biochem. Sci., 40, 58, 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.007 · DOI
- Hochstrasser, 2014, CasA mediates Cas3-catalyzed target degradation during CRISPR RNA-guided interference, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 6618, 10.1073/pnas.1405079111 · DOI
- Hooton, 2014, Campylobacter jejuni acquire new host-derived CRISPR spacers when in association with bacteriophages harboring a CRISPR-like Cas4 protein, Front Microbiol, 5, 744
- Howes, 2015, Genome engineering using Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV), Methods Mol. Biol., 1239, 75, 10.1007/978-1-4939-1862-1_5 · DOI
- Huo, 2014, Structures of CRISPR Cas3 offer mechanistic insights into Cascade-activated DNA unwinding and degradation, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 21, 771, 10.1038/nsmb.2875 · DOI
- Hynes, 2014, Adaptation in bacterial CRISPR-Cas immunity can be driven by defective phages, Nat. Commun., 5, 4399, 10.1038/ncomms5399 · DOI
- Ishino, 1987, Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product, J. Bacteriol., 169, 5429, 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 · DOI · Paper page
- Jackson, 2015, A Conserved Structural Chassis for Mounting Versatile CRISPR RNA-Guided Immune Responses, Mol. Cell, 58, 722, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.023 · DOI
- Jackson, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli, Science, 345, 1473, 10.1126/science.1256328 · DOI
- Jansen, 2002, Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes, Mol. Microbiol., 43, 1565, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x · DOI · Paper page
- Jiang, 2015, CRISPR-Cas: New Tools for Genetic Manipulations from Bacterial Immunity Systems, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 69, 209, 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104441 · DOI
- Jiang, 2015, STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition, Science, 348, 1477, 10.1126/science.aab1452 · DOI
- Jore, 2011, Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, 529, 10.1038/nsmb.2019 · DOI
- Juranek, 2012, A genome-wide view of the expression and processing patterns of Thermus thermophilus HB8 CRISPR RNAs, RNA, 18, 783, 10.1261/rna.031468.111 · DOI
- Kenchappa, 2013, Solution properties of the archaeal CRISPR DNA repeat-binding homeodomain protein Cbp2, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 3424, 10.1093/nar/gks1465 · DOI
- Koo, 2012, Crystal structure of Streptococcus pyogenes Csn2 reveals calcium-dependent conformational changes in its tertiary and quaternary structure, PLoS ONE, 7, e33401, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033401 · DOI
- Kuhn, 2013, Eukaryotic Argonautes come into focus, Trends Biochem. Sci., 38, 263, 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.02.008 · DOI
- Kunin, 2007, Evolutionary conservation of sequence and secondary structures in CRISPR repeats, Genome Biol., 8, R61, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r61 · DOI
- Labrie, 2010, Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 8, 317, 10.1038/nrmicro2315 · DOI
- Lee, 2012, Identification, structural, and biochemical characterization of a group of large Csn2 proteins involved in CRISPR-mediated bacterial immunity, Proteins, 80, 2573, 10.1002/prot.24138 · DOI
- Lee, 2013, RNA-protein analysis using a conditional CRISPR nuclease, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 5416, 10.1073/pnas.1302807110 · DOI
- Lemak, 2013, Toroidal structure and DNA cleavage by the CRISPR-associated [4Fe-4S] cluster containing Cas4 nuclease SSO0001 from Sulfolobus solfataricus, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 17476, 10.1021/ja408729b · DOI
- Levy, 2015, CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA, Nature, 520, 505, 10.1038/nature14302 · DOI
- Li, 2014, Adaptation of the Haloarcula hispanica CRISPR-Cas system to a purified virus strictly requires a priming process, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 2483, 10.1093/nar/gkt1154 · DOI
- Lin, 2014, Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, eLife, 3, e04766, 10.7554/eLife.04766 · DOI · Paper page
- Lintner, 2011, Structural and functional characterization of an archaeal clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated complex for antiviral defense (CASCADE), J. Biol. Chem., 286, 21643, 10.1074/jbc.M111.238485 · DOI
- Ma, 2015, Single-stranded DNA cleavage by divergent CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes, Mol. Cell, 60, 398, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.030 · DOI
- Makarova, 2015, Annotation and Classification of CRISPR-Cas Systems, Methods Mol. Biol., 1311, 47, 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_4 · DOI
- Makarova, 2011, Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems, Biol. Direct, 6, 38, 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38 · DOI
- Makarova, 2011, Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 467, 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
- Makarova, 2013, The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR-CAS systems, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 41, 1392, 10.1042/BST20130038 · DOI · Paper page
- Makarova, 2015, An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 722, 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
- Marraffini, 2008, CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA, Science, 322, 1843, 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
- Marraffini, 2010, Self versus non-self discrimination during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity, Nature, 463, 568, 10.1038/nature08703 · DOI
- Mizuuchi, 1991, Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism, Cell, 66, 129, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90145-O · DOI
- Mojica, 2005, Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements, J. Mol. Evol., 60, 174, 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Mojica, 2009, Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system, Microbiology, 155, 733, 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Mulepati, 2011, Structural and biochemical analysis of nuclease domain of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated protein 3 (Cas3), J. Biol. Chem., 286, 31896, 10.1074/jbc.M111.270017 · DOI
- Mulepati, 2013, In vitro reconstitution of an Escherichia coli RNA-guided immune system reveals unidirectional, ATP-dependent degradation of DNA target, J. Biol. Chem., 288, 22184, 10.1074/jbc.M113.472233 · DOI · Paper page
- Mulepati, 2014, Structural biology. Crystal structure of a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex bound to a ssDNA target, Science, 345, 1479, 10.1126/science.1256996 · DOI
- Nam, 2012, Cas5d protein processes pre-crRNA and assembles into a cascade-like interference complex in subtype I-C/Dvulg CRISPR-Cas system, Structure, 20, 1574, 10.1016/j.str.2012.06.016 · DOI
- Nihongaki, 2015, Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 755, 10.1038/nbt.3245 · DOI
- Nishimasu, 2015, Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9, Cell, 162, 1113, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.007 · DOI
- Nissim, 2014, Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells, Mol. Cell, 54, 698, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.022 · DOI
- Nuñez, 2014, Cas1-Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 21, 528, 10.1038/nsmb.2820 · DOI · Paper page
- Nuñez, 2015, Integrase-mediated spacer acquisition during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, Nature, 519, 193, 10.1038/nature14237 · DOI · Paper page
- Nuñez, 2015, Foreign DNA capture during CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, Nature, 527, 535, 10.1038/nature15760 · DOI · Paper page
- Osawa, 2015, Crystal structure of the CRISPR-Cas RNA silencing Cmr complex bound to a target analog, Mol. Cell, 58, 418, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Paez-Espino, 2013, Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage, Nat. Commun., 4, 1430, 10.1038/ncomms2440 · DOI
- Paez-Espino, 2015, CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus, MBio, 6, 10.1128/mBio.00262-15 · DOI
- Patterson, 2015, Regulation of the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system by CRP-cAMP and GalM controls spacer acquisition and interference, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 6038, 10.1093/nar/gkv517 · DOI
- Pawluk, 2014, A new group of phage anti-CRISPR genes inhibits the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mBio., 5, 10.1128/mBio.00896-14 · DOI
- Plagens, 2012, Characterization of the CRISPR/Cas subtype I-A system of the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Thermoproteus tenax, J. Bacteriol., 194, 2491, 10.1128/JB.00206-12 · DOI
- Plagens, 2014, In vitro assembly and activity of an archaeal CRISPR-Cas type I-A Cascade interference complex, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 5125, 10.1093/nar/gku120 · DOI
- Plagens, 2015, DNA and RNA interference mechanisms by CRISPR-Cas surveillance complexes, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 39, 442, 10.1093/femsre/fuv019 · DOI
- Polstein, 2015, A light-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system for control of endogenous gene activation, Nat. Chem. Biol., 11, 198, 10.1038/nchembio.1753 · DOI
- Pourcel, 2005, CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies, Microbiology, 151, 653, 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Pul, 2010, Identification and characterization of E. coli CRISPR-cas promoters and their silencing by H-NS, Mol. Microbiol., 75, 1495, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07073.x · DOI · Paper page
- Rath, 2015, Efficient programmable gene silencing by Cascade, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 237, 10.1093/nar/gku1257 · DOI
- Ratner, 2015, I can see CRISPR now, even when phage are gone: a view on alternative CRISPR-Cas functions from the prokaryotic envelope, Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis., 28, 267, 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000154 · DOI
- Redding, 2015, Surveillance and processing of foreign DNA by the Escherichia coli CRISPR-Cas system, Cell, 163, 854, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Richter, 2013, The subtype I-F CRISPR-Cas system influences pathogenicity island retention in Pectobacterium atrosepticum via crRNA generation and Csy complex formation, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 41, 1468, 10.1042/BST20130151 · DOI
- Richter, 2012, In vivo protein interactions and complex formation in the Pectobacterium atrosepticum subtype I-F CRISPR/Cas System, PLoS ONE, 7, e49549, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049549 · DOI
- Richter, 2014, Priming in the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system triggers strand-independent spacer acquisition, bi-directionally from the primed protospacer, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 8516, 10.1093/nar/gku527 · DOI
- Rollie, 2015, Intrinsic sequence specificity of the Cas1 integrase directs new spacer acquisition, eLife, 4, 4, 10.7554/eLife.08716 · DOI
- Rollins, 2015, Mechanism of foreign DNA recognition by a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 2216, 10.1093/nar/gkv094 · DOI
- Rutkauskas, 2015, Directional R-Loop Formation by the CRISPR-Cas Surveillance Complex Cascade Provides Efficient Off-Target Site Rejection, Cell Rep., 10, 1534, 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.067 · DOI
- Salvail-Lacoste, 2013, Affinity purification of T7 RNA transcripts with homogeneous ends using ARiBo and CRISPR tags, RNA, 19, 1003, 10.1261/rna.037432.112 · DOI
- Samai, 2015, Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA Cleavage during Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity, Cell, 161, 1164, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Sashital, 2011, An RNA-induced conformational change required for CRISPR RNA cleavage by the endoribonuclease Cse3, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, 680, 10.1038/nsmb.2043 · DOI
- Sashital, 2012, Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system, Mol. Cell, 46, 606, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.020 · DOI
- Savitskaya, 2013, High-throughput analysis of type I-E CRISPR/Cas spacer acquisition in E. coli, RNA Biol., 10, 716, 10.4161/rna.24325 · DOI
- Schunder, 2013, First indication for a functional CRISPR/Cas system in Francisella tularensis, Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 303, 51, 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.11.004 · DOI
- Semenova, 2011, Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 10098, 10.1073/pnas.1104144108 · DOI · Paper page
- Servick, 2015, SCIENCE POLICY. U.S. to review agricultural biotech regulations, Science, 349, 131, 10.1126/science.349.6244.131 · DOI
- Shao, 2013, Recognition and cleavage of a nonstructured CRISPR RNA by its processing endoribonuclease Cas6, Structure, 21, 385, 10.1016/j.str.2013.01.010 · DOI
- Shmakov, 2014, Pervasive generation of oppositely oriented spacers during CRISPR adaptation, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 5907, 10.1093/nar/gku226 · DOI · Paper page
- Shmakov, 2015, Discovery and functional characterization of diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, Mol. Cell, 60, 385, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Sinkunas, 2011, Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system, EMBO J., 30, 1335, 10.1038/emboj.2011.41 · DOI
- Sinkunas, 2013, In vitro reconstitution of Cascade-mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus, EMBO J., 32, 385, 10.1038/emboj.2012.352 · DOI · Paper page
- Sokolowski, 2014, Cas6 specificity and CRISPR RNA loading in a complex CRISPR-Cas system, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 6532, 10.1093/nar/gku308 · DOI
- Staals, 2014, RNA targeting by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas Csm complex of Thermus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 56, 518, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.005 · DOI
- Sternberg, 2015, Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9, Mol. Cell, 58, 568, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.032 · DOI
- Sternberg, 2012, Mechanism of substrate selection by a highly specific CRISPR endoribonuclease, RNA, 18, 661, 10.1261/rna.030882.111 · DOI
- Sternberg, 2014, DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9, Nature, 507, 62, 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
- Sternberg, 2015, Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9, Nature, 527, 110, 10.1038/nature15544 · DOI · Paper page
- Swarts, 2012, CRISPR interference directs strand specific spacer acquisition, PLoS ONE, 7, e35888, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035888 · DOI
- Szczelkun, 2014, Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 9798, 10.1073/pnas.1402597111 · DOI
- Tamulaitis, 2014, Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus, Mol. Cell, 56, 506, 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.027 · DOI
- Taylor, 2015, Structural biology. Structures of the CRISPR-Cmr complex reveal mode of RNA target positioning, Science, 348, 581, 10.1126/science.aaa4535 · DOI
- Tsai, 2014, Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 569, 10.1038/nbt.2908 · DOI · Paper page
- Tsui, 2015, Structure Principles of CRISPR-Cas Surveillance and Effector Complexes, Annu. Rev. Biophys., 44, 229, 10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-033939 · DOI
- van der Oost, 2009, CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes, Trends Biochem. Sci., 34, 401, 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.05.002 · DOI
- van der Oost, 2014, Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 12, 479, 10.1038/nrmicro3279 · DOI
- van Erp, 2015, Mechanism of CRISPR-RNA guided recognition of DNA targets in Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 8381, 10.1093/nar/gkv793 · DOI
- Vestergaard, 2014, CRISPR adaptive immune systems of Archaea, RNA Biol., 11, 156, 10.4161/rna.27990 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, Structural and mechanistic basis of PAM-dependent spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems, Cell, 163, 840, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Wei, 2015, Sequences spanning the leader-repeat junction mediate CRISPR adaptation to phage in Streptococcus thermophilus, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, 1749, 10.1093/nar/gku1407 · DOI
- Wei, 2015, Cas9 function and host genome sampling in Type II-A CRISPR-Cas adaptation, Genes Dev., 29, 356, 10.1101/gad.257550.114 · DOI
- Westra, 2012, CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3, Mol. Cell, 46, 595, 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018 · DOI
- Westra, 2014, CRISPR-Cas systems: beyond adaptive immunity, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 12, 317, 10.1038/nrmicro3241 · DOI
- Wiedenheft, 2011, Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system, Nature, 477, 486, 10.1038/nature10402 · DOI
- Wiedenheft, 2011, RNA-guided complex from a bacterial immune system enhances target recognition through seed sequence interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 10092, 10.1073/pnas.1102716108 · DOI
- Wright, 2015, Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 2984, 10.1073/pnas.1501698112 · DOI
- Yosef, 2012, Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, 5569, 10.1093/nar/gks216 · DOI · Paper page
- Yosef, 2013, DNA motifs determining the efficiency of adaptation into the Escherichia coli CRISPR array, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 14396, 10.1073/pnas.1300108110 · DOI
- Zetsche, 2015, Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System, Cell, 163, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
- Zetsche, 2015, A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 139, 10.1038/nbt.3149 · DOI
- Zhang, 2013, Processing-independent CRISPR RNAs limit natural transformation in Neisseria meningitidis, Mol. Cell, 50, 488, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.001 · DOI
- Zhang, 2015, DNase H Activity of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9, Mol. Cell, 60, 242, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.020 · DOI
- Zhao, 2014, Crystal structure of the RNA-guided immune surveillance Cascade complex in Escherichia coli, Nature, 515, 147, 10.1038/nature13733 · DOI
- Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 73, 10.1038/nbt.3081 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection
Eyquem, J., Mansilla-Soto, J., Giavridis, T., van der Stegen, S. J. C., Hamieh, M., Cunanan, K. M., Odak, A., Gönen, M., & Sadelain, M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21405 · Cited by 1,831
Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008 · Cited by 1,423
Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches
Lino, C. A., Harper, J. C., Carney, J. P., & Timlin, J. A. (2018) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964 · Cited by 1,185
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout and Transcriptional Activation Screening
Joung, J., Konermann, S., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Platt, R. J., Brigham, M. D., Sanjana, N. E., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2017.016 · Cited by 1,243
Rock, J. M., Hopkins, F. F., Chavez, A., Diallo, M., Chase, M. R., Gerrick, E. R., Pritchard, J. R., Church, G. M., Rubin, E. J., Sassetti, C. M., et al. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.274 · Cited by 538
Smargon, A. A., Cox, D. B. T., Pyzocha, N. K., Zheng, K., Slaymaker, I. M., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. A., Essletzbichler, P., Shmakov, S., Makarova, K. S., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.023 · Cited by 575
Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems
Koonin, E. V., & Makarova, K. S. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0087 · Cited by 494
DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008 · Cited by 431
Increasing the specificity of CRISPR systems with engineered RNA secondary structures
Kocak, D. D., Josephs, E. A., Bhandarkar, V., Adkar, S. S., Kwon, J. B., & Gersbach, C. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0095-1 · Cited by 351
Systematic Immunotherapy Target Discovery Using Genome-Scale In Vivo CRISPR Screens in CD8 T Cells
Dong, M. B., Wang, G., Chow, R. D., Ye, L., Zhu, L., Dai, X., Park, J. J., Kim, H. R., Errami, Y., Guzman, C. D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.044 · Cited by 330
“CRISPR technologies have dramatically enhanced our ability in genome editing (Cong et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2014; Jinek et al., 2012; Komor et al., 2017; Mali et al., 2013; Wright et al., 2016).”
A non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system for therapeutically targeting HBV DNA and pcsk9 in vivo
Jiang, C., Mei, M., Li, B., Zhu, X., Zu, W., Tian, Y., Wang, Q., Guo, Y., Dong, Y., & Tan, X. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2017.16 · Cited by 295
A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9
Dagdas, Y. S., Chen, J. S., Sternberg, S. H., Doudna, J. A., & Yildiz, A. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao0027 · Cited by 293
Self-citationProgrammable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11
Özcan, A., Krajeski, R., Ioannidi, E., Lee, B., Gardner, A., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., Abudayyeh, O. O., & Gootenberg, J. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03886-5 · Cited by 263
The diverse and expanding role of mass spectrometry in structural and molecular biology
Lössl, P., van de Waterbeemd, M., & Heck, A. J. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201694818 · Cited by 222
Zaidi, S. S.-E.-A., Mahas, A., Vanderschuren, H., & Mahfouz, M. M. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02204-y · Cited by 221
CRISPR-Based Technologies: Impact of RNA-Targeting Systems
Terns, M. P. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.018 · Cited by 168
Current status and perspectives of genome editing technology for microalgae
Jeon, S., Lim, J.-M., Lee, H.-G., Shin, S.-E., Kang, N. K., Park, Y.-I., Oh, H.-M., Jeong, W.-J., Jeong, B.-R., & Chang, Y. K. (2017) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0957-z · Cited by 154
Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis, T., Aregger, M., Brown, K. R., Farhangmehr, S., Braunschweig, U., Ward, H. N., Ha, K. C. H., Weiss, A., Billmann, M., Durbic, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0437-z · Cited by 142
Type III CRISPR-Cas immunity: major differences brushed aside
Tamulaitis, G., Venclovas, Č., & Siksnys, V. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.09.012 · Cited by 126
RNA Interference (RNAi) Screening in Drosophila
Heigwer, F., Port, F., & Boutros, M. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.117.300077 · Cited by 125
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Structural basis for the altered PAM recognition by engineered CRISPR-Cpf1
Nishimasu, H., Yamano, T., Gao, L., Zhang, F., Ishitani, R., & Nureki, O. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.019 · Cited by 102
CRISPR Approaches to Small Molecule Target Identification
Jost, M., & Weissman, J. S. (2018) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00965 · Cited by 88
Heterologous production of cyanobacterial compounds
Dhakal, D., Chen, M., Luesch, H., & Ding, Y. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1093/jimb/kuab003 · Cited by 33
“The recent development of robust genome engineering approaches such as CRISPR-Cas further facilitates host engineering to improve the productivity of expressed NPs, including those from cyanobacterial BGCs (Wright et al., 2016; Mougiakos et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSpecificity profiling of CRISPR system reveals greatly enhanced off-target gene editing
Wang, Y., Wang, M., Zheng, T., Hou, Y., Zhang, P., Tang, T., Wei, J., & Du, Q. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58627-x · Cited by 31
Evasion of Pre-Existing Immunity to Cas9: A Prerequisite for Successful Genome Editing In Vivo?
Wignakumar, T., & Fairchild, P. J. (2019) · Current Transplantation Reports · doi:10.1007/s40472-019-00237-2 · Cited by 19
Celotti, M., Derks, L. L. M., van Es, J., van Boxtel, R., Clevers, H., & Geurts, M. H. (2024) · STAR Protocols · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103189 · Cited by 17
Chromatin structure and context-dependent sequence features control prime editing efficiency
Kim, S., Yuan, J. B., Woods, W. S., Newton, D. A., Perez-Pinera, P., & Song, J. S. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1222112 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, A. V., Nuñez, J. K., & Doudna, J. A.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 29-44
- ISSN
- 0092-8674
- Cited by
- 989
- References
- 8
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- US National Science Foundation (1244557)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review