Cited by 420Computational Drug Discovery MethodsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets

Open access
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia Consortium, The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer Consortium·2015·Nature

Abstract

Large cancer cell line collections broadly capture the genomic diversity of human cancers and provide valuable insight into anti-cancer drug response. Here we show substantial agreement and biological consilience between drug sensitivity measurements and their associated genomic predictors from two publicly available large-scale pharmacogenomics resources: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer databases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature15736

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale drug sensitivity studies using MEK and ERK inhibitors did not reveal the same degree of selectivity in KRAS mutant cells.

    “However, large-scale drug sensitivity studies using the MEK and ERK inhibitors did not reveal the same degree of selectivity in KRAS mutant cells (69, 70) (Figure 4).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [70]

  • Majority of KRAS-mutant CRC cell lines exhibit elevated ABCB1 expression.

    “Notably, the majority of KRAS-mutant CRC cell lines exhibit elevated ABCB1 expression (39)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia Consortium, & The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer Consortium
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-11-16
Volume
528
Issue
7580
Pages
84-87
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2318806991
Cited by
418
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 19 · 2012: 1
FWCI
31.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (086357, 102696STRATTON, 102696)
  • Cancer Research UK (A16629)
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54hg006097-03)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (1U54HG006097-01, U54-HG006097)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
cancer cell lines, drug sensitivity, pharmacogenomics, GDSC, data concordance, anticancer drug response, drug library
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Pharmacogenetics, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Cell Line, Tumor, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review