Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 808

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer

Open access
Martinez, Esteban A., Muschik, Christine A., Schindler, Philipp, Nigg, Daniel, Erhard, Alexander, Heyl, Markus, Hauke, Philipp, Dalmonte, Marcello, Monz, Thomas, Zoller, Peter, Blatt, Rainer·2016·Nature

Abstract

Gauge theories are fundamental to our understanding of interactions between the elementary constituents of matter as mediated by gauge bosons. However, computing the real-time dynamics in gauge theories is a notorious challenge for classical computational methods. This has recently stimulated theoretical effort, using Feynman’s idea of a quantum simulator, to devise schemes for simulating such theories on engineered quantum-mechanical devices, with the difficulty that gauge invariance and the associated local conservation laws (Gauss laws) need to be implemented. Here we report the experimental demonstration of a digital quantum simulation of a lattice gauge theory, by realizing (1 + 1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics (the Schwinger model) on a few-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer. We are interested in the real-time evolution of the Schwinger mechanism, describing the instability of the bare vacuum due to quantum fluctuations, which manifests itself in the spontaneous creation of electron–positron pairs. To make efficient use of our quantum resources, we map the original problem to a spin model by eliminating the gauge fields in favour of exotic long-range interactions, which can be directly and efficiently implemented on an ion trap architecture. We explore the Schwinger mechanism of particle–antiparticle generation by monitoring the mass production and the vacuum persistence amplitude. Moreover, we track the real-time evolution of entanglement in the system, which illustrates how particle creation and entanglement generation are directly related. Our work represents a first step towards quantum simulation of high-energy theories using atomic physics experiments—the long-term intention is to extend this approach to real-time quantum simulations of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature18318

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 808

Metadata

Authors
Martinez, E. A., Muschik, C. A., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Erhard, A., Heyl, M., Hauke, P., Dalmonte, M., Monz, T., Zoller, P., & Blatt, R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-06-22
Volume
534
Issue
7608
Pages
516-519
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2394549188
Cited by
808
References
9
FWCI
52.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature18318
The paper
Martinez, E. A., Muschik, C. A., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Erhard, A., Heyl, M., Hauke, P., Dalmonte, M., Monz, T., Zoller, P., & Blatt, R. (2016). Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.