The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer
Open accessAbstract
Gauge theories are fundamental to our understanding of interactions between the elementary constituents of matter as mediated by gauge bosons. However, computing the real-time dynamics in gauge theories is a notorious challenge for classical computational methods. This has recently stimulated theoretical effort, using Feynman’s idea of a quantum simulator, to devise schemes for simulating such theories on engineered quantum-mechanical devices, with the difficulty that gauge invariance and the associated local conservation laws (Gauss laws) need to be implemented. Here we report the experimental demonstration of a digital quantum simulation of a lattice gauge theory, by realizing (1 + 1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics (the Schwinger model) on a few-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer. We are interested in the real-time evolution of the Schwinger mechanism, describing the instability of the bare vacuum due to quantum fluctuations, which manifests itself in the spontaneous creation of electron–positron pairs. To make efficient use of our quantum resources, we map the original problem to a spin model by eliminating the gauge fields in favour of exotic long-range interactions, which can be directly and efficiently implemented on an ion trap architecture. We explore the Schwinger mechanism of particle–antiparticle generation by monitoring the mass production and the vacuum persistence amplitude. Moreover, we track the real-time evolution of entanglement in the system, which illustrates how particle creation and entanglement generation are directly related. Our work represents a first step towards quantum simulation of high-energy theories using atomic physics experiments—the long-term intention is to extend this approach to real-time quantum simulations of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization
Schwinger, J. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664 · Cited by 7,116
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 3×
“This provides the tools for universal digital quantum simulation [16], where the time evolution of a quantum system is approximated as a stroboscopic sequence of quantum gates [17].”
MethodGeorgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932
Quantum simulations with trapped ions
Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2252 · Cited by 1,629
Self-citationLarge-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic interconnects
Monroe, C., Raussendorf, R., Ruthven, A., Brown, K. R., Maunz, P., Duan, L.-M., & Kim, J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.022317 · Cited by 700
Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay
Gorin, T., Prosen, T., Seligman, T. H., & Žnidarič, M. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.09.003 · Cited by 623
Universal Digital Quantum Simulation with Trapped Ions
Lanyon, B. P., Hempel, C., Nigg, D., Müller, M., Gerritsma, R., Zähringer, F., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Rambach, M., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208001 · Cited by 613
Self-citation
Cited by
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review
Wendin, G. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a · Cited by 890
Programmable Quantum Simulations of Spin Systems with Trapped Ions
Monroe, C., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L. M., Gong, Z. X., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N., Pagano, G., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.07845 · Cited by 806
Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions
Monroe, C., Campbell, W. C., Duan, L.-M., Gong, Z.-X., Gorshkov, A. V., Hess, P. W., Islam, R., Kim, K., Linke, N. M., Pagano, G., et al. (2021) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.025001 · Cited by 802
Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review
Heyl, M. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a · Cited by 678
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez, E. A., Muschik, C. A., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Erhard, A., Heyl, M., Hauke, P., Dalmonte, M., Monz, T., Zoller, P., & Blatt, R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2016-06-22
- Volume
- 534
- Issue
- 7608
- Pages
- 516-519
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2394549188
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 52.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature18318
- The paper
- Martinez, E. A., Muschik, C. A., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Erhard, A., Heyl, M., Hauke, P., Dalmonte, M., Monz, T., Zoller, P., & Blatt, R. (2016). Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.