The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes
Open accessAbstract
Measurements and simulations have found that water moves through carbon nanotubes at exceptionally high rates owing to nearly frictionless interfaces. These observations have stimulated interest in nanotube-based membranes for applications including desalination, nano-filtration and energy harvesting, yet the exact mechanisms of water transport inside the nanotubes and at the water–carbon interface continue to be debated because existing theories do not provide a satisfactory explanation for the limited number of experimental results available so far. This lack of experimental results arises because, even though controlled and systematic studies have explored transport through individual nanotubes, none has met the considerable technical challenge of unambiguously measuring the permeability of a single nanotube. Here we show that the pressure-driven flow rate through individual nanotubes can be determined with unprecedented sensitivity and without dyes from the hydrodynamics of water jets as they emerge from single nanotubes into a surrounding fluid. Our measurements reveal unexpectedly large and radius-dependent surface slippage in carbon nanotubes, and no slippage in boron nitride nanotubes that are crystallographically similar to carbon nanotubes, but electronically different. This pronounced contrast between the two systems must originate from subtle differences in the atomic-scale details of their solid–liquid interfaces, illustrating that nanofluidics is the frontier at which the continuum picture of fluid mechanics meets the atomic nature of matter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomedicine Meets Fenton Chemistry
Tang, Z., Zhao, P., Wang, H., Liu, Y., & Bu, W. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00977 · Cited by 745
New avenues for the large-scale harvesting of blue energy
Siria, A., Bocquet, M.-L., & Bocquet, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-017-0091 · Cited by 640
Self-citationRao, R., Pint, C. L., Islam, A. E., Weatherup, R. S., Hofmann, S., Meshot, E. R., Wu, F., Zhou, C., Dee, N., Amama, P. B., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b06511 · Cited by 588
Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, J., Li, X., Xu, J., & Dong, X. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612608114 · Cited by 567
Fluids at the Nanoscale: From Continuum to Subcontinuum Transport
Kavokine, N., Netz, R. R., & Bocquet, L. (2021) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-071320-095958 · Cited by 389
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Secchi, E., Marbach, S., Niguès, A., Stein, D., Siria, A., & Bocquet, L.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 537
- Issue
- 7619
- Pages
- 210-213
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2509844572
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature19315
- The paper
- Secchi, E., Marbach, S., Niguès, A., Stein, D., Siria, A., & Bocquet, L. (2016). Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.