The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The isotopic nature of the Earth’s accreting material through time
Abstract
The Earth formed by accretion of Moon- to Mars-size embryos coming from various heliocentric distances. The isotopic nature of these bodies is unknown. However, taking meteorites as a guide, most models assume that the Earth must have formed from a heterogeneous assortment of embryos with distinct isotopic compositions. High-precision measurements, however, show that the Earth, the Moon and enstatite meteorites have almost indistinguishable isotopic compositions. Models have been proposed that reconcile the Earth-Moon similarity with the inferred heterogeneous nature of Earth-forming material, but these models either require specific geometries for the Moon-forming impact or can explain only one aspect of the Earth-Moon similarity (that is, 17 O). Here I show that elements with distinct affinities for metal can be used to decipher the isotopic nature of the Earth's accreting material through time. I find that the mantle signatures of lithophile O, Ca, Ti and Nd, moderately siderophile Cr, Ni and Mo, and highly siderophile Ru record different stages of the Earth's accretion; yet all those elements point to material that was isotopically most similar to enstatite meteorites. This isotopic similarity indicates that the material accreted by the Earth always comprised a large fraction of enstatite-type impactors (about half were E-type in the first 60 per cent of the accretion and all of the impactors were E-type after that). Accordingly, the giant impactor that formed the Moon probably had an isotopic composition similar to that of the Earth, hence relaxing the constraints on models of lunar formation. Enstatite meteorites and the Earth were formed from the same isotopic reservoir but they diverged in their chemical evolution owing to subsequent fractionation by nebular and planetary processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094
Warren, P. H. (2011) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.047 · Cited by 756
Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning
Ćuk, M., & Stewart, S. T. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225542 · Cited by 680
Forming a Moon with an Earth-like composition via a giant impact
Canup, R. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226073 · Cited by 656
142 Nd Evidence for Early (>4.53 Ga) Global Differentiation of the Silicate Earth
Boyet, M., & Carlson, R. W. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113634 · Cited by 643
The chemical composition of the Earth: Enstatite chondrite models
Javoy, M., Kaminski, É., Guyot, F., Andrault, D., Sanloup, C., Moreira, M., Labrosse, S., Jambon, A., Agrinier, P., Davaille, A., et al. (2010) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2010.02.033 · Cited by 470
The Major-Element Composition of Mercury’s Surface from MESSENGER X-ray Spectrometry
Nittler, L. R., Starr, R. D., Weider, S. Z., McCoy, T. J., Boynton, W. V., EBEL, D. S., Ernst, C. M., Evans, L. G., Goldsten, J. O., Hamara, D. K., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211567 · Cited by 469
Rubie, D. C., Jacobson, S. A., Morbidelli, A., O'Brien, D. P., Young, E., de Vries, J., Nimmo, F., Palme, H., & Frost, D. J. (2014) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.015 · Cited by 448
The proto-Earth as a significant source of lunar material
Zhang, J., Dauphas, N., Davis, A. M., Ingo Leya, D., & Fedkin, A. V. (2012) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1429 · Cited by 423
Self-citationEquilibration in the aftermath of the lunar-forming giant impact
Pahlevan, K., & Stevenson, D. J. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.055 · Cited by 381
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dauphas, N., Chen, J. & Papanastassiou, D. Testing Earth–Moon isotopic homogenization with calcium-48. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. XXXXVI, 2436 (2015)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Catling, D. C., & Zahnle, K. J. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax1420 · Cited by 568
“2020;6 : eaax1420 26 February 2020 that this highly reducingmeteoriticmaterial was delivered late in Earth’s accretion (28).”
BackgroundEarth’s water may have been inherited from material similar to enstatite chondrite meteorites
Piani, L., Marrocchi, Y., Rigaudier, T., Vacher, L. G., Thomassin, D., & Marty, B. M. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba1948 · Cited by 331
The Origin of the Moon Within a Terrestrial Synestia
Lock, S. J., Stewart, S. T., Petaev, M. I., Leinhardt, Z. M., Mace, M., Jacobsen, S. B., & Ćuk, M. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research Planets · doi:10.1002/2017je005333 · Cited by 328
Water in the Earth’s Interior: Distribution and Origin
Peslier, A. H., Schönbächler, M., Busemann, H., & Karato, S. (2017) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0387-z · Cited by 286
The timeline of the lunar bombardment: Revisited
Morbidelli, A., Nesvorný, D., Laurenz, V., Marchi, S., Rubie, D. C., Elkins-Tanton, L. T., Wieczorek, M. A., & Jacobson, S. A. (2018) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.046 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Dauphas, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dauphas, Nicolas
- ORCID
- Dauphas, Nicolas
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-01-26
- Volume
- 541
- Issue
- 7638
- Pages
- 521-524
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2582940684
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 17
- FWCI
- 22.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- Earth formation, enstatite meteorites, lithophile elements, siderophile elements, highly siderophile elements, giant impacts, oxygen isotopes, calcium isotopes, titanium isotopes, Nd isotopes, chromium isotopes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
