The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communication between viruses guides lysis–lysogeny decisions
Open accessAbstract
Temperate viruses can become dormant in their host cells, a process called lysogeny. In every infection, such viruses decide between the lytic and the lysogenic cycles, that is, whether to replicate and lyse their host or to lysogenize and keep the host viable. Here we show that viruses (phages) of the SPbeta group use a small-molecule communication system to coordinate lysis–lysogeny decisions. During infection of its Bacillus host cell, the phage produces a six amino-acids-long communication peptide that is released into the medium. In subsequent infections, progeny phages measure the concentration of this peptide and lysogenize if the concentration is sufficiently high. We found that different phages encode different versions of the communication peptide, demonstrating a phage-specific peptide communication code for lysogeny decisions. We term this communication system the ‘arbitrium’ system, and further show that it is encoded by three phage genes: aimP, which produces the peptide; aimR, the intracellular peptide receptor; and aimX, a negative regulator of lysogeny. The arbitrium system enables a descendant phage to ‘communicate’ with its predecessors, that is, to estimate the amount of recent previous infections and hence decide whether to employ the lytic or lysogenic cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J., & Fineran, P. C. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8 · Cited by 917
A Host-Produced Quorum-Sensing Autoinducer Controls a Phage Lysis-Lysogeny Decision
Silpe, J. E., & Bassler, B. L. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.059 · Cited by 363
Mechanisms and clinical importance of bacteriophage resistance
Egido, J. E., Costa, A. R., Aparicio-Maldonado, C., Haas, P.-J., & Brouns, S. J. J. (2022) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuab048 · Cited by 325
Large-Scale Analyses of Human Microbiomes Reveal Thousands of Small, Novel Genes
Sberro, H., Fremin, B. J., Zlitni, S., Edfors, F., Greenfield, N., Snyder, M. P., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Kyrpides, N. C., & Bhatt, A. S. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.016 · Cited by 237
Maciejewska, B., Olszak, T., & Drulis-Kawa, Z. (2018) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-018-8811-1 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Erez, Z., Steinberger-Levy, I., Shamir, M., Doron, S., Stokar-Avihail, A., Peleg, Y., Melamed, S., Leavitt, A., Savidor, A., Albeck, S., Amitai, G., & Sorek, R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 541
- Issue
- 7638
- Pages
- 488-493
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2579294549
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication between viruses guides lysis–lysogeny decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature21049
- The paper
- Erez, Z., Steinberger-Levy, I., Shamir, M., Doron, S., Stokar-Avihail, A., Peleg, Y., Melamed, S., Leavitt, A., Savidor, A., Albeck, S., Amitai, G., & Sorek, R. (2017). Communication between viruses guides lysis–lysogeny decisions. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.