Cited by 753Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition

Open access
Flyamer, Ilya M., Gassler, Johanna, Imakaev, Maxim, Brandão, Hugo B., Ulianov, Sergey V., Abdennur, Nezar, Razin, Sergey V., Mirny, Leonid A. +1 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Chromatin is reprogrammed after fertilization to produce a totipotent zygote with the potential to generate a new organism. The maternal genome inherited from the oocyte and the paternal genome provided by sperm coexist as separate haploid nuclei in the zygote. How these two epigenetically distinct genomes are spatially organized is poorly understood. Existing chromosome conformation capture-based methods are not applicable to oocytes and zygotes owing to a paucity of material. To study three-dimensional chromatin organization in rare cell types, we developed a single-nucleus Hi-C (high-resolution chromosome conformation capture) protocol that provides greater than tenfold more contacts per cell than the previous method. Here we show that chromatin architecture is uniquely reorganized during the oocyte-to-zygote transition in mice and is distinct in paternal and maternal nuclei within single-cell zygotes. Features of genomic organization including compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs) and loops are present in individual oocytes when averaged over the genome, but the presence of each feature at a locus varies between cells. At the sub-megabase level, we observed stochastic clusters of contacts that can occur across TAD boundaries but average into TADs. Notably, we found that TADs and loops, but not compartments, are present in zygotic maternal chromatin, suggesting that these are generated by different mechanisms. Our results demonstrate that the global chromatin organization of zygote nuclei is fundamentally different from that of other interphase cells. An understanding of this zygotic chromatin 'ground state' could potentially provide insights into reprogramming cells to a state of totipotency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature21711

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-cell Hi-C studies confirm the presence of TADs in individual cells but demonstrate significant variability in their shape.

    “Currently, single-cell Hi-C studies confirm the presence of TADs in individual cells but demonstrate significant variability in their shape (i.e., in the folding of DNA within TADs) [142,143,144,145].”

    From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [142]

    The paper reports variable contact patterns in individual cells, with clusters frequently violating population TAD boundaries (Abstract). It also finds enrichment of contacts within TADs in individual oocytes, but concludes that TADs are population-average features rather than isolated DNA blocks present in each cell. Thus, it supports variability in folding, but not the unqualified claim that individual-cell TADs are confirmed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a portion of TAD borders are shared between most individual cells, whereas other borders appear to be variable.

    “It was also found that only a portion of TAD borders are shared between most individual cells, whereas other borders appear to be variable [142,143].”

    From Enhancer Function in the 3D Genome (2023) · cites this paper as [142]

  • Some types of epigenetic modifications, such as changes in chromosome conformation, are still largely unexplored in MDD.

    “Some types of epigenetic modifications, such as changes in chromosome conformation are still largely unexplored in MDD.414,415”

    From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [415]

    The paper discusses chromosome organization in oocytes and zygotes (Abstract; page unavailable), but does not address major depressive disorder or whether chromosome-conformation changes are largely unexplored in it. Searches for MDD, depression, and psychiatric disease found no passage speaking to that research-gap claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Zhou L Dean J Reprogramming the genome to totipotency in mouse embryos Trends Cell Biol 25 82 91 2015 25448353 PMC4312727
  2. [3]Ma W Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes Nat Methods 12 71 78 2015 25437436 PMC4281301
  3. [5]Barutcu AR C-ing the Genome: A Compendium of Chromosome Conformation Capture Methods to Study Higher-Order Chromatin Organization J Cell Physiol 231 31 35 2016 26059817 PMC4586368
  4. [6]Lieberman-Aiden E Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome Science 326 289 293 2009 19815776 PMC2858594
  5. [7]Rodley CDM Bertels F Jones B O’Sullivan JM Global identification of yeast chromosome interactions using Genome conformation capture Fungal Genet Biol 46 879 886 2009 19628047
  6. [8]Rao SSP A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping Cell 159 1665 1680 2014 25497547 PMC5635824
  7. [9]Nagano T Cell cycle dynamics of chromosomal organisation at single-cell resolution Preprint at http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/12/15/094466 2016 10.1101/094466 PMC5567812 28682332 · DOI
  8. [10]Ramani V Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C Preprint at http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/07/23/065052 2016 10.1101/065052 PMC5330809 28135255 · DOI
  9. [12]Mizuguchi T Cohesin-dependent globules and heterochromatin shape 3D genome architecture in S. pombe Nature 516 432 435 2014 25307058 PMC4465753
  10. [13]Tjong H Gong K Chen L Alber F Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast Genome Res 22 1295 1305 2012 22619363 PMC3396370
  11. [14]Halverson JD Smrek J Kremer K Grosberg AY From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding Rep Prog Phys 77 022601 2014 24472896
  12. [20]Crane E Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation Nature 523 240 244 2015 26030525 PMC4498965
  13. [23]Miyara F Chromatin configuration and transcriptional control in human and mouse oocytes Mol Reprod Dev 64 458 470 2003 12589658
  14. [24]Bouniol-Baly C Differential Transcriptional Activity Associated with Chromatin Configuration in Fully Grown Mouse Germinal Vesicle Oocytes Biol Reprod 60 580 587 1999 10026102
  15. [25]Battulin N Comparison of the three-dimensional organization of sperm and fibroblast genomes using the Hi-C approach Genome Biol 16 2015 PMC4434584 25886366
  16. [26]Ward WS Coffey DS DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells Biol Reprod 44 569 574 1991 2043729
  17. [27]Adenot PG Mercier Y Renard JP Thompson EM Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos Dev Camb Engl 124 4615 4625 1997 9409678
  18. [29]Tachibana-Konwalski K Rec8-containing cohesin maintains bivalents without turnover during the growing phase of mouse oocytes Genes Dev 24 2505 2516 2010 20971813 PMC2975927
  19. [30]Selvaraj S Dixon JR Bansal V Ren B Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing Nat Biotechnol 31 1111 1118 2013 24185094 PMC4180835

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flyamer, I. M., Gassler, J., Imakaev, M., Brandão, H. B., Ulianov, S. V., Abdennur, N., Razin, S. V., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana-Konwalski, K.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (AT)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Mirny, Leonid A.
  • Tachibana-Konwalski, Kikuë
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
544
Issue
7648
Pages
110-114
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2599773520
Cited by
753
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
35.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1504942)
  • Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
  • Austrian Science Fund (W1238)
  • Russian Science Foundation (14–24–00022)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114190)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
  • Institute of Genetics
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (336460)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
chromatin organization, 3D genome organization, topologically associating domains, A/B compartments, chromatin looping, totipotency, mouse embryo development
MeSH terms
Paternal Inheritance, Maternal Inheritance, Animals, Cell Nucleus, Chromatin, Female, Haploidy, Interphase, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Oocytes, Stochastic Processes, Zygote, Totipotent Stem Cells, Chromosome Positioning, Mice, Cell Transdifferentiation, Single-Cell Analysis, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review