Cited by 831Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsCell death mechanisms and regulationAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion

Open access
Saw, Thuan Beng, Doostmohammadi, Amin, Nier, Vincent, Kocgozlu, Leyla, Thampi, Sumesh, Toyama, Yusuke, Marcq, Philippe, Lim, Chwee Teck +2 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Epithelial tissues (epithelia) remove excess cells through extrusion, preventing the accumulation of unnecessary or pathological cells. The extrusion process can be triggered by apoptotic signalling, oncogenic transformation and overcrowding of cells. Despite the important linkage of cell extrusion to developmental, homeostatic and pathological processes such as cancer metastasis, its underlying mechanism and connections to the intrinsic mechanics of the epithelium are largely unexplored. We approach this problem by modelling the epithelium as an active nematic liquid crystal (that has a long range directional order), and comparing numerical simulations to strain rate and stress measurements within monolayers of MDCK (Madin Darby canine kidney) cells. Here we show that apoptotic cell extrusion is provoked by singularities in cell alignments in the form of comet-shaped topological defects. We find a universal correlation between extrusion sites and positions of nematic defects in the cell orientation field in different epithelium types. The results confirm the active nematic nature of epithelia, and demonstrate that defect-induced isotropic stresses are the primary precursors of mechanotransductive responses in cells, including YAP (Yes-associated protein) transcription factor activity, caspase-3-mediated cell death, and extrusions. Importantly, the defect-driven extrusion mechanism depends on intercellular junctions, because the weakening of cell-cell interactions in an α-catenin knockdown monolayer reduces the defect size and increases both the number of defects and extrusion rates, as is also predicted by our model. We further demonstrate the ability to control extrusion hotspots by geometrically inducing defects through microcontact printing of patterned monolayers. On the basis of these results, we propose a mechanism for apoptotic cell extrusion: spontaneously formed topological defects in epithelia govern cell fate. This will be important in predicting extrusion hotspots and dynamics in vivo, with potential applications to tissue regeneration and the suppression of metastasis. Moreover, we anticipate that the analogy between the epithelium and active nematic liquid crystals will trigger further investigations of the link between cellular processes and the material properties of epithelia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature21718

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The engineer's approach is to pursue simpler reductionist models defined by minimal functional modules (MFMs) that drive a complex cellular or tissue FOI, to study mechanobiological causation or develop robust systems for high throughput screening.

    “On the other hand, the engineer’s (cell as a machine) approach28,247 is to pursue simpler reductionist models defined by the minimal functional modules (MFMs) that drive a complex cellular or tissue FOI, to study the mechanobiological causation in development or repair, or to develop a robust system for high throughput screening.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For most users, simpler organoid models are more robust for mechanistic studies and applications.

    “For majority users, simpler ones are more robust for mechanistic studies and applications27–29.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Methods passages discuss models of epithelial monolayers and the robustness of stress-inference techniques (page not available). Searches for simpler organoid models and their suitability for most users found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [48]Prost J The physics of liquid crystals Oxford University Press 1995
  2. [49]Larson RG The structure and rheology of complex fluids Oxford University Press New York 1999 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saw, T. B., Doostmohammadi, A., Nier, V., Kocgozlu, L., Thampi, S., Toyama, Y., Marcq, P., Lim, C. T., Yeomans, J. M., & Ladoux, B.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
  • Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Lim, Chwee Teck
  • Yeomans, Julia M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-04-13
Volume
544
Issue
7649
Pages
212-216
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2606063864
Cited by
831
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 24
FWCI
33.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
topological defects, cell extrusion, cell death, epithelial mechanics, active nematic liquid crystals, cell orientation, mechanotransduction, YAP, caspase-3, cell-cell adhesion, alpha-catenin, microcontact printing, MDCK cells, compressive stress, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Dogs, Epithelial Cells, Intercellular Junctions, Models, Biological, Transcription Factors, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Liquid Crystals, alpha Catenin, Caspase 3, Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review