The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohesin is positioned in mammalian genomes by transcription, CTCF and Wapl
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian genomes are spatially organized by CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and cohesin into chromatin loops and topologically associated domains, which have important roles in gene regulation and recombination. By binding to specific sequences, CTCF defines contact points for cohesin-mediated long-range chromosomal cis-interactions. Cohesin is also present at these sites, but has been proposed to be loaded onto DNA elsewhere and to extrude chromatin loops until it encounters CTCF bound to DNA. How cohesin is recruited to CTCF sites, according to this or other models, is unknown. Here we show that the distribution of cohesin in the mouse genome depends on transcription, CTCF and the cohesin release factor Wings apart-like (Wapl). In CTCF-depleted fibroblasts, cohesin cannot be properly recruited to CTCF sites but instead accumulates at transcription start sites of active genes, where the cohesin-loading complex is located. In the absence of both CTCF and Wapl, cohesin accumulates in up to 70 kilobase-long regions at 3'-ends of active genes, in particular if these converge on each other. Changing gene expression modulates the position of these 'cohesin islands'. These findings indicate that transcription can relocate mammalian cohesin over long distances on DNA, as previously reported for yeast cohesin, that this translocation contributes to positioning cohesin at CTCF sites, and that active genes can be freed from cohesin either by transcription-mediated translocation or by Wapl-mediated release.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since cohesin can remain topologically engaged and slide on both naked DNA42–44 and chromatin,45,46”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386
Differential expression analysis for sequence count data
Anders, S., & Huber, W. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · Cited by 15,581
TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. S., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 · Cited by 11,682
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y., & Smyth, G. K. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks042 · Cited by 5,195
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sambrook, J & Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Vol. 3, A9.25–A9.34 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 475
Erythroid Cell Research: 3D Chromatin, Transcription Factors and Beyond
Andrieu‐Soler, C., & Soler, É. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23116149 · Cited by 8
“complex binding sites [54], or by RNA polymerase II at some gene promoters [55,56]”
BackgroundDespang, A., Schöpflin, R., Franke, M., Ali, S., Jerković, I., Paliou, C., Chan, W.-L., Timmermann, B., Wittler, L., Vingron, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/566562 · Cited by 8
Author response: Scc2/Nipbl hops between chromosomal cohesin rings after loading
Rhodes, J., Mazza, D., Nasmyth, K., & Uphoff, S. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.30000.020 · Cited by 8
Genome organization across scales: mechanistic insights from in vitro reconstitution studies
Oberbeckmann, E., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2024) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20230883 · Cited by 7
Cohesin-Dependent Loop Extrusion: Molecular Mechanics and Role in Cell Physiology
Golov, A. K., & Gavrilov, A. A. (2024) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297924040023 · Cited by 9
“The islands, similarly to the yeast CAR-sites are predominantly located at the 3′-ends of convergently transcribed genes; their formation can also be prevented by inhibition of transcription [38].”
Pushing the TAD boundary: Decoding insulator codes of clustered CTCF sites in 3D genomes
Huang, H., & Wu, Q. (2024) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202400121 · Cited by 7
Patients with 10q22.3q23.1 recurrent deletion syndrome are at risk for juvenile polyposis
Lecoquierre, F., Cassinari, K., Chambon, P., Nicolas, G., Malsa, S., Marlin, R., Assouline, Y., Fléjou, J., Frébourg, T., Houdayer, C., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103773 · Cited by 7
Defects of cohesin loader lead to bone dysplasia associated with transcriptional disturbance
Gu, W., Wang, L., Gu, R., Ouyang, H., Bao, B., Zheng, L., & Xu, B. (2021) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.30491 · Cited by 8
“To validate the transcriptional regulation of Nipbl on gene expression, we compared human NCCs' DEGs and MEFs' DEGs with Nipbl‐bound genes from Roman's Nipbl ChIP‐Seq data set (GSM1979785) (Busslinger et al., 2017) (Figure S5c,d), and conducted ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) (Tables 1 and 2).”
MethodRecurrent Germline Variant in RAD21 Predisposes Children to Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoma
Schedel, A., Friedrich, U. A., Morcos, M. N. F., Wagener, R., Mehtonen, J., Watrin, T., Saitta, C., Brozou, T., Michler, P., Walter, C., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23095174 · Cited by 7
“The cohesin complex is a cogwheel of ordered chromosome alignment and segregation during cell division, homologous-recombination-driven DNA repair and regulation of gene expression [5,29,30].”
BackgroundRekaik, H., Lopez‐Delisle, L., Hintermann, A., Mascrez, B., Bochaton, C., & Duboule, D. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.29.505673 · Cited by 7
“To back up this dynamic of RAD21, we profiled NIPBL, one of the factors loading the cohesin complex onto chromatin (Ciosk et al., 2000)(Fig.”
BackgroundTranscription-Driven Translocation of Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Cohesin In Vivo
Borrie, M. S., Kraycer, P. M., & Gartenberg, M. R. (2023) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1080/10985549.2023.2199660 · Cited by 6
“Initially, RNA polymerase was seen as the central driver of repositioning because cohesin on dormant or weakly transcribed genes was relocated downstream upon transcriptional activation.(5,6,17) Numerous observations suggested that cohesin translocates processively: (1) at low temperature, gene induction moved the com…”
BackgroundCoßmann, J., Kos, P. I., Varamogianni‐Mamatsi, V., Assenheimer, D. S., Bischof, T. A., Kuhn, T., Vomhof, T., Papantonis, A., Giorgetti, L., & Gebhardt, J. C. M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56889-5 · Cited by 6
“The latter case is still compatible withworkshowingthatPolIIisabletopushcohesin 129,130 ,ifafractionof cohesin remains bound to DNA, and compatible with counteraction of loop extrusion and formation of new TADs by RNA-PolII 87,131 .”
The 3D Genome in Brain Development: An Exploration of Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Methods
Rahman, S., & Roussos, P. (2024) · Neuroscience Insights · doi:10.1177/26331055241293455 · Cited by 7
Kitamura, K., Suzuki, H., Abe, R., Inohara, H., Kaneda, Y., Takahashi, H., & Nimura, K. (2022) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-022-00812-8 · Cited by 6
“CTCF is a well-known chromatin architectural factor that forms a complex with cohesin [29].”
BackgroundDilution of contact frequency between superenhancers by loop extrusion at interfaces
Yamamoto, T., & Schießel, H. (2019) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c9sm01454c · Cited by 6
Nuclear position modulates long-range chromatin interactions
Finn, E. H., & Misteli, T. (2022) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010451 · Cited by 6
“Sequence-specific chromatin loops are generated by loop extrusion, in which the cohesin motor protein complex spools the chromatin fiber through its ring until it meets the boundary protein CTCF, and the cohesin complex stalls and stabilizes associations between two distal CTCF sites in the form of a loop (7-10).”
BackgroundCohesin and CTCF do not assemble TADs inXenopussperm and male pronucleiPreprint
Jessberger, G., Várnai, C., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Stary, G., & Peters, J. (2023) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.277865.123 · Cited by 6
Self-citationSchooley, A., Venev, S. V., Aksenova, V., Navarrete, E., Dasso, M., & Dekker, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.16.613305 · Cited by 6
RNA Pol II-based regulations of chromosome folding
Chapard, C., Bastié, N., Cournac, A., Chaptal, L., Mboumba, H., Queillé, S., Thierry, A., Gadal, O., Lengronne, A., Koszul, R., et al. (2025) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100970 · Cited by 6
FACT depletion demonstrates a role for nucleosome organization in TAD formation
Mauksch, C., Zhu, Y., Velychko, T., Sagropoulou, S., Aljahani, A., Ramasamy, S., Žumer, K., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2025) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-025-00165-7 · Cited by 5
“…leads to a global reduction in transcription levels ( Ž umer et al, 2024) and that the process of transcription in fl uences 3D genome organization (Banigan et al, 2023; Barshad et al, 2023; Brandão et al, 2019; Busslinger et al, 2017; Hsieh et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2023; Zhang et al, 2021).”
Unique territorial and compartmental organization of chromosomes in the holocentric silkworm
Gil, J., Navarrete, E., Hockens, C. B., Chowdhury, N., Abraham, S., Cornilleau, G., Lei, E. P., Mozziconacci, J., Banigan, E. J., Rosin, L. F., et al. (2026) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-026-00694-3 · Cited by 7
“…et al, 2004; Gullerova and Proudfoot, 2008; Glynn et al, 2004; Bausch et al, 2007) and bacteria (Tran et al, 2017; Brandão et al, 2019) were foundational for subsequent studies explaining the nature of SMC-RNA Polymerase interactions in mammals (Busslinger et al, 2017; Banigan et al, 2023).”
Corticosteroid‐induced chromatin loop dynamics at the FKBP5 gene
Wang, C., Manders, F., Groh, L., Oldenkamp, R., & Logie, C. (2023) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15064 · Cited by 3
Bridging spatial and temporal scales of developmental gene regulation
Cardona, A. H., Peixoto, M. M., Borjigin, T., & Gregor, T. (2025) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2025.102328 · Cited by 5
“Transcriptional activity can influence chromatin folding within TADs [11,16,17,28,61] and near TAD boundaries [62–67].”
Dynamics of the host chromatin three-dimensional response to influenza virus infection
Shiimori, M., Nukiwa, R., & Imai, Y. (2021) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxab043 · Cited by 5
Rad21 Haploinsufficiency Prevents ALT-Associated Phenotypes in Zebrafish Brain Tumors
Idilli, A. I., Pazzi, C., Pozzolo, F. D., Roccuzzo, M., & Mione, M. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11121442 · Cited by 5
Suv4-20h2 protects against influenza virus infection by suppression of chromatin loop formation
Shiimori, M., Ichida, Y., Nukiwa, R., Sakuma, T., Abe, H., Kajitani, R., Fujino, Y., Kikuchi, A., Kawamura, T., Kodama, T., et al. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102660 · Cited by 5
Cell type-specific chromatin topology and gene regulation
Phanstiel, D. H., & Wang, G. G. (2022) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.008 · Cited by 5
Loop Extrusion Mediates Physiological Locus Contraction for V(D)J RecombinationPreprint
Dai, H., Hu, H., Lou, J., Ye, A. Y., Chapdelaine-Williams, A. M., Kyritsis, N., Zhang, Y., Manfredonia, N., Judson, R., Chen, H., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.181222 · Cited by 5
NIPBL and WAPL balance cohesin activity to regulate chromatin folding and gene expressionPreprint
Luppino, J. M., Field, A. R., Nguyen, S. C., Park, D. S., Shah, P. P., Lan, Y., Yunker, R., Jain, R., Adelman, K., & Joyce, E. F. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.04.19.488785 · Cited by 5
CTCF blocks anti-sense transcription initiation at divergent gene promotersPreprint
Luan, J. Y., Syrett, C. M., Vermunt, M. W., Coté, A., Tome, J. M., Zhang, H., Huang, A., Luppino, J. M., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B. M., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.30.465508 · Cited by 5
Multipartite super-enhancers function in an orientation-dependent mannerPreprint
Kassouf, M. T., Francis, H. S., Gosden, M. E., Suciu, M., Downes, D. J., Harrold, C. L., Larke, M., Oudelaar, A. M., Cornell, L., Blayney, J., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.14.499999 · Cited by 6
Chapard, C., Bastié, N., Cournac, A., Gadal, O., Koszul, R., & Beckouët, F. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.29.573667 · Cited by 6
“…convergent direction in organisms as different as Saccharomyces. cerevisiae , Schizosaccharomyces pombe and in mammals depleted for both for CTCF and Wpl1, suggest that active transcription may also displace or stop DNA loop extruding cohesin, and/or interfere with cohesin loading process (22–26).”
BackgroundAnderson, E. C., Rahmaninejad, H., Aljahani, A., Arnold, E. M., Adachi, A. S., Shah, R., Hansen, K. L., Cavka, I., Boettiger, A. N., Fudenberg, G., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.20.700462 · Cited by 7
Yuan, T., Yan, H., Li, K., Surovtsev, I. V., King, M. C., & Mochrie, S. G. J. (2024) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03432-2 · Cited by 7
Barrier effects on the kinetics of cohesin-mediated loop extrusion
Chen, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Hong, L., Wang, H., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.026 · Cited by 4
Tei, S., Bando, M., Sakata, T., Yoshimura, A., Natsume, T., Kanemaki, M. T., Sutani, T., & Shirahige, K. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76738-3 · Cited by 4
“We investigated cohesin ’ s transcriptional function by genome-wide pro fi ling of transcription dynamics, histone modi fi cations, and 3D genome architecture, together with in vitro reconstitution of the transcription machinery.”
Jumping retroviruses nudge TADs apart
Robson, M. I., & Mundlos, S. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0491-y · Cited by 4
Lambing, C., Tock, A. J., Choi, K., Topp, S. D., Kuo, P. C., Blackwell, A. R., Zhao, X., Osman, K., Higgins, J. D., Franklin, F. C. H., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/512400 · Cited by 4
“Transcription drives cohesin occupancy in diverse eukaryotes (Lengronne et al. 2004; Bausch et al. 2007; Sun et al. 2015; Busslinger et al. 2017).”
BackgroundRNA surveillance controls 3D genome structure via stable cohesin-chromosome interactionPreprint
Chun, Y., Han, S., Kim, T., Choi, Y., & Lee, D. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.31.446489 · Cited by 4
Context-dependent transcriptional remodeling of TADs during differentiationPreprint
Chahar, S., Zouari, Y. B., Salari, H., Molitor, A., Kobi, D., Maroquenne, M., Erb, C., Mossler, A., Karasu, N., Jost, D., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.07.01.498405 · Cited by 4
Subramani, P. G., Seija, N., Ridani, J., Boulais, J., Donnelly, P. A., Provencher, M., Bagci, H., Poitras, C., Côté, J., Robert, F., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68332-4 · Cited by 3
“Since transcription impacts chromatin loop extrusion 68 , we hypothesized that transcriptional alterations at H3K79me2/3-rich regions mightunderliecohesindistributionchangesinDOT1L-de fi cientBcells.”
Research progress in mitochondrial gene editing technology
Yichen, W. A. N. G., Wáng, Y., Yu, C. H. E. N., Yan, Q., & Lin, A. (2023) · Journal of Zhejiang University (Medical Sciences) · doi:10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0129 · Cited by 3
Jeon, B. C., Kim, Y., Park, A. K., Song, M.-R., Na, K. M., Lee, J., An, D., Park, Y., Hwang, H., Kim, T., et al. (2024) · Cellular and Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41423-024-01236-9 · Cited by 3
“4D; fourth blot), previous studies reported that the cohesin complex, which includes SMC1 and SMC3, has no signi fi cant effect on the DNA-binding ability of CTCF normalized against the negative control (ACTG1) [43, 44].”
Buka, K., Parteka-Tojek, Z., Agarwal, A., Denkiewicz, M., Korsak, S., Chiliński, M., Banecki, K. H., & Plewczyński, D. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07847-w · Cited by 4
“The transcription process was shown to translocate cohesin along the DNA over long distances 10,12 .”
Osadská, M., Selicky, T., Kretová, M., Jurcik, J., Sivakova, B., Cipakova, I., & Cipak, L. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23073939 · Cited by 2
Epstein-Barr Virus and host cell 3D genome organization
Wang, C., & Zhao, B. (2023) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29234 · Cited by 2
Multilayered Mechanisms for Long-range Regulatory Interactions in Eukaryotic Transcription
Fukaya, T. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169311 · Cited by 3
Setting new boundaries with transcription and CTCF
Anderson, E. C., & Nora, E. P. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0704-4 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., Williams, S. G., Jones, H. R., Keavney, B. D., & Choy, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02373-1 · Cited by 3
Tandem Directional CTCF Sites Balance Protocadherin Promoter UsagePreprint
Wu, Q., Guo, Y., Lu, Y., Li, J., Wu, Y., & Jia, Z. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/525543 · Cited by 3
“CTCF mediates specific directional loop formation through asymmetric anchoring of the ring-shaped Cohesin complex, which topologically slides along chromatin fibers to extrude loops [3, 12, 18, 19, 32, 44].”
BackgroundTheoretical Principles of Enhancer-Promoter Communication in Transcriptional BurstingPreprint
Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Luo, S., Zhou, T., & Zhang, J. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.24.477520 · Cited by 2
Transcription regulates the spatio-temporal dynamics of genes through micro-compartmentalizationPreprint
Salari, H., Fourel, G., & Jost, D. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.18.549489 · Cited by 3
Zhegalova, I., Ulianov, S., Galitsyna, A., Pletenev, I., Tsoy, O., Luzhin, A. V., Vasiluev, P., Bulavko, E. S., Ivankov, D., Gavrilov, A., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.12.598618 · Cited by 2
Promoter strength and position govern promoter competition via transcript-dependent insulationPreprint
Koska, M., Nagano, M., Swigut, T., Boettiger, A. N., Hansen, A. S., & Wysocka, J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.06.652547 · Cited by 3
“While the Ef1a promoter lacks CTCF binding, as do most promoters examined in our study, it has been suggested that RNA Polymerase II (Pol2) may also act as a barrier to cohesin mediated loop extrusion 30–34 .”
Wang, Z., Liu, F., Chen, N., Wu, J., Li, X., Fang, M., Yan, M., Zhang, J., Deng, B., Wang, L., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64066-x · Cited by 3
“…FRETassay, APEX2 assay, in vitro kinase assay, and TLK2 overexpression assay, the cDNA of FKBP, Frb, mNeonGreen, mRuby3, and APEX2 were synthesized by the company based on sequences from the fl uorescent protein database FPbase or Addgene, as detailed in Supplementary Data 13.”
InfluentialEpiMCI: Predicting Multi-Way Chromatin Interactions from Epigenomic Signals
Xu, J., Zhang, P., Sun, W., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Hou, C., & Li, L. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12091203 · Cited by 2
“We used functional genomic signals on the 1 Mb genomic bins (histone mark ChIP-seq / we the the wet were several proteins that tended to function together in our original features. formation noise (i.e., insignificant features) [40,41].”
MethodConvergent pairs of highly transcribed genes restrict chromatin looping in Dictyostelium discoideum
Zhegalova, I. V., Ulianov, S. V., Galitsyna, A. A., Pletenev, I. A., Tsoy, O. V., Luzhin, A. V., Vasiluev, P. A., Bulavko, E. S., Ivankov, D. N., Gavrilov, A. A., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf006 · Cited by 6
Hot debate in hot springs: Report on the second international meeting on SMC proteins
Hirano, T., Nishiyama, T., & Shirahige, K. (2017) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1111/gtc.12539 · Cited by 2
“Dale Dorsett (St. Louis U., USA) and Jan- Michael Peters (IMP, Austria) reported genomewide distribution and relocation of cohesin and its related proteins in Drosophila and mammalian cells, respectively (Busslinger et al., 2017).”
BackgroundPapale, A., & Holcman, D. (2021) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/abf93a · Cited by 2
“These loops are controlled by specific structures such as the cohesin ring and CTCF chromatin binding sites [6–12], concentrated in the majority of borders that demarcate TADs [13].”
A Robust Protocol for Investigating the Cohesin Complex by ChIP-Sequencing
Gines, M. M., & Wendt, K. S. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2140-0_7 · Cited by 2
Rearrangement of T Cell genome architecture regulates GVHD
Sun, Y., Dotson, G. A., Muir, L. A., Ronquist, S., Oravecz-Wilson, K. I., Peltier, D., Seike, K., Li, L., Meixner, W., Rajapakse, I., et al. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104846 · Cited by 2
See, Y. X., Chen, K., & Fullwood, M. J. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.04.425344 · Cited by 2
Oncogenic c-Myc induces replication stress by increasing cohesins chromatin occupancyPreprint
Peripolli, S., Singh, T., Patel, H., Meneguello, L., Kiso, K., Thorpe, P. H., Bertoli, C., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.25.453647 · Cited by 3
Context-dependent 3D genome regulation by cohesin and related factorsPreprint
Nakato, R., Sakata, T., Wang, J., Nagai, L. A. E., Oba, G. M., Bando, M., & Shirahige, K. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.24.493188 · Cited by 2
Tei, S., Sakata, T., Yoshimura, A., Natsume, T., Kanemaki, M. T., Bando, M., & Shirahige, K. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.15.584908 · Cited by 2
“9,25,12,13,26 Thus, the contribution of cohesin-mediated promoter-enhancer interactions to gene expression remains unclear.”
BackgroundA guide to studying 3D genome structure and dynamics in the kidney
Beliveau, B. J., & Akilesh, S. (2024) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-024-00894-2 · Cited by 1
Allyn, B. M., Hayer, K. E., Oyeniran, C., Nganga, V. K., Lee, K. D., Saçan, A., Oltz, E. M., & Bassing, C. H. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116133 · Cited by 2
Distinct and compensatory roles of STAG1 and STAG2 in post-mitotic genome refolding
Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Shan, F., Pei, C., Liu, F., Xia, S., Shu, L., Li, B., Jing, D., Weng, Y., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74870-8 · Cited by 1
“Reformation of structural loops after mitosis is tightly controlled by cohesin recruitment 25,34,36 .”
CTCF’s loop-independent functions prevail over chromatin looping in the acute degradation system
Hu, G., Ji, B., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, X., Ren, H., Liao, J., & Yao, H. (2025) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1093/procel/pwaf087 · Cited by 1
Κοσμαρά, Δ., Papanikolaou, S., Stathopoulou, C., Papamatheakis, D.-A., Vatsellas, G., Cimmarrusti, A., Banos, A., Sidiropoulos, P. I., Lavigne, M. D., Verginis, P., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65309-7 · Cited by 1
“Together with other subunits (SMC3, RAD21, STAG1/2),SMC1A forms the cohesin complex involved in chromosome segregation, homologous recombination, and genome regulation 44 – 46 .”
A functional overlap between actively transcribed genes and chromatin insulator elements
Cornell, L., Harrold, C. L., Holliman, S., Tsang, F. H., Gosden, M. E., Hanssen, L. E., Stolper, R. J., Downes, D. J., Biggs, D., Preece, C., et al. (2026) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-026-00730-2 · Cited by 3
“…genomes, transcription has been also been associated with domain boundaries (Bonev et al, 2017; Dixon et al, 2012); reported to interact with the cohesin loop extrusion machinery (Busslinger et al, 2017); and with disruption of expression of downstream genes (Bozhilov et al, 2021; Cho et al, 2018).”
RNAPII and DNA supercoiling regulate cohesin engagement in neurons
Crewe, M., Delint‐Ramírez, I., Halawa, O., Heady, L., & Madabhushi, R. (2026) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkag553 · Cited by 1
“These results are consistent with observations in other cells suggesting that either RNAPII or R-loops act as barriers for cohesin-mediated loop extrusion [ 25 , 27 , 67–69 ].”
Promoter strength and position govern promoter competition through transcript-dependent insulation
Koska, M., Nagano, M., Swigut, T., Boettiger, A. N., Hansen, A. S., & Wysocka, J. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02691-y · Cited by 6
STAG2-RAD21 complex: A unidirectional DNA ratchet mechanism in loop extrusion
Ros‐Pardo, D., Gómez‐Puertas, P., & Marcos‐Alcalde, Í. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133822 · Cited by 1
“During interphase, loop extrusion organizes chromatin in TADs (Topologically Associating Domains) which are limited by DNA-bound transcriptional factors CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) [25,26].”
Three-dimensional genome rewiring during the development of antibody-secreting cells
Chan, W. F., Johanson, T. M., & Allan, R. S. (2020) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20191104 · Cited by 1
Chromatin: A Semi-Structured Polymer
Dawson, W., Łaźniewski, M., & Plewczyński, D. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20240-9 · Cited by 1
The CTCF Anatomy of Topologically Associating DomainsPreprint
Nanni, L., Wang, C., Manders, F., Groh, L. A., Haro, P., Oldenkamp, R., Ceri, S., & Logie, C. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/746610 · Cited by 1
“In human cells, Cohesin complexes only accumulate at RNA polymerase II poly-adenylation sites when CTCF is absent (Busslinger et al., 2017).”
BackgroundDenholtz, M., Zhu, Y., He, Z., Lu, H., Isoda, T., Döhrmann, S., Nizet, V., & Murre, C. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/808568 · Cited by 1
MyoD is a structure organizer of 3D genome architecture in muscle cellsPreprint
Chen, Q., Chen, F., Wang, R., Shi, M., Chen, A. K., Ma, Z., Li, G., Wang, M., Li, H., Zhang, X., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.29.273375 · Cited by 1
Hou, H. (2019) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Different NIPBL requirements of cohesin-STAG1 and cohesin-STAG2Preprint
Gil, D. A., Cuadrado, A., Giménez-Llorente, D., Rodríguez-Corsino, M., & Losada, A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.29.518367 · Cited by 1
RNA Pol II antagonises mitotic chromatin folding and chromosome segregation by condensinPreprint
Lebreton, J., Colin, L., Chatre, E., & Bernard, P. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.08.552486 · Cited by 1
BRWD1 establishes epigenetic states for germinal center initiation, maintenance, and functionPreprint
Wright, N., Kennedy, D. E., Ai, J., Veselits, M., Attaway, M., Yoon, Y. M., Durkee, M. S., Veselits, J., Maienschein‐Cline, M., Mandal, M., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.25.591154 · Cited by 1
Karpińska, M. A., Zhu, Y., Ghazvini, Z. F., Ramasamy, S., Barbieri, M., Cao, T. B. N., Varahram, N., Aljahani, A., Lidschreiber, M., Papantonis, A., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.20.624447 · Cited by 1
Cohesin extrudes chromatin loop unidirectionally through two modes of mechanisms in human cellsPreprint
Wang, P., Meng, L., Jiang, L., Li, Y., Huang, J., Tiancheng, Y. U., Chai, H., Kim, M., Wang, X., & Ruan, Y. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.01.722300 · Cited by 1
Conserved lifestyle-associated chromosome architectures across mammalian symbiontsPreprint
Viehboeck, T., Krause, N., Weber, P., Shea, E., Noetzel, V., Pende, N., Gölles-Kirth, H., Varoquaux, N., Boccard, F., Junier, I., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.07.20.739713 · Cited by 1
“These loops are observed as corner peaks at TAD boundaries and result from the structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) cohesin complexes and the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding the DNA at specific sites (Busslinger et al., 2017; Wutz et al., 2017; Sanborn et al., 2015).”
Promoter interactions direct chromatin folding in embryonic stem cells
Sanyal, S., Molnárová, L., & Gregáň, J. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3421 · Cited by 1
Misulovin, Z., Pherson, M., Gause, M., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., & Dorsett, D. (2017) · Greater South Information System · doi:10.60692/4pqw3-36a54
Panousis, N. I., Bertsias, G. K., Ongen, H., Gergianaki, I., Tektonidou, M. G., Trachana, M., Romano, L., Bielser, D., Howald, C., Pamfil, C. A. M., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/255109
Twenty-First Century Glucocorticoid Receptor Molecular Biology
Wang, C., Oldenkamp, R., Oellers, R., & Logie, C. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.72016
“Cohesin is most likely loaded onto its chromatid substrate by the NIPBL2/Mau2 cohesin-loading complex, which is enriched at transcription start sites (TSS) [60, 61].”
BackgroundNovel Approaches for Pluripotent Reprogramming
Weltner, J. (2018) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Orlandini, E., Marenduzzo, D., & Michieletto, D. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/410019
Organizing Principles for the Spatial Folding of Chromosomes
Josipović, N., & Papantonis, A. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814879-2.00005-4
Orlandini, E., Marenduzzo, D., & Michieletto, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.01267
“While a population of condensins is stably bound in mitosis (55), cohesin is known to turn over in about τ =20 min through interphase (56).”
BackgroundNishiyama, T. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.002
The Effect of rs77275268 on Gene Expression at the Transcriptional Hub at 6q25.1
Mackie, S. (2020) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)
Extrusion without a motor: a new take on the loop extrusion model of genome organizationPreprint
Brackley, C. A., Johnson, J., Michieletto, D., Morozov, A. N., Nicodemi, M., Cook, P. R., & Marenduzzo, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02548
“Additionally, cohesin has been observed to translocate away from its loading sites to become enriched elsewhere [15,16].”
BackgroundZhang, S., Zhou, Y. F., Wang, Q., Donahue, K., Feng, J., Yao, Y., Chen, A., Li, X., & Hong, L. (2020) · Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · doi:10.1177/1533033820960726
“Increasing evidence has shown that NIPBL is involved in the transcriptional regulation of downstream genes by recruiting the cohesin complex and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) to maintain the 3-dimensional structure and stability of genomes, and long-range interactions of chromatin.(31-33) Furthermore, NIPBL has been sho…”
BackgroundEukaryotic Genome in Three Dimensions
Razin, S. V., Gavrilov, A. A., & Ulianov, S. V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62532-0_2
Metadata
- Authors
- Busslinger, G. A., Stocsits, R. R., van der Lelij, P., Axelsson, E., Tedeschi, A., Galjart, N., & Peters, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Peters, Jan-Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 544
- Issue
- 7651
- Pages
- 503-507
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6080695
- OpenAlex
- W2607008467
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 35
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cohesin, CTCF, WAPL, transcription, cohesin loading, chromatin looping, topologically associating domains, 3D genome organization, transcription start sites, mouse genome, cis-interactions, gene expression regulation, recombination, mouse fibroblasts
- MeSH terms
- CCCTC-Binding Factor, Cohesins, Animals, Binding Sites, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA, Female, Fibroblasts, Male, Proteins, Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Genome, Cell Cycle Proteins, Protein Transport, Transcription Initiation Site, Chromosomes, Mammalian, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review