Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-scale activation screen identifies a lncRNA locus regulating a gene neighbourhood

Open access
Joung, Julia, Engreitz, Jesse M., Konermann, Silvana, Abudayyeh, Omar O., Verdine, Vanessa K., Aguet, Francois, Gootenberg, Jonathan S., Sanjana, Neville E., Wright, Jason B., Fulco, Charles P., Tseng, Yuen-Yi, Yoon, Charles H., Boehm, Jesse S., Lander, Eric S., Zhang, Feng·2017·Nature

Abstract

Mammalian genomes contain thousands of loci that transcribe long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), some of which are known to carry out critical roles in diverse cellular processes through a variety of mechanisms. Although some lncRNA loci encode RNAs that act non-locally (in trans), there is emerging evidence that many lncRNA loci act locally (in cis) to regulate the expression of nearby genes—for example, through functions of the lncRNA promoter, transcription, or transcript itself. Despite their potentially important roles, it remains challenging to identify functional lncRNA loci and distinguish among these and other mechanisms. Here, to address these challenges, we developed a genome-scale CRISPR–Cas9 activation screen that targets more than 10,000 lncRNA transcriptional start sites to identify noncoding loci that influence a phenotype of interest. We found 11 lncRNA loci that, upon recruitment of an activator, mediate resistance to BRAF inhibitors in human melanoma cells. Most candidate loci appear to regulate nearby genes. Detailed analysis of one candidate, termed EMICERI, revealed that its transcriptional activation resulted in dosage-dependent activation of four neighbouring protein-coding genes, one of which confers the resistance phenotype. Our screening and characterization approach provides a CRISPR toolkit with which to systematically discover the functions of noncoding loci and elucidate their diverse roles in gene regulation and cellular function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23451

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Joung, J., Engreitz, J. M., Konermann, S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Verdine, V. K., Aguet, F., Gootenberg, J. S., Sanjana, N. E., Wright, J. B., Fulco, C. P., Tseng, Y.-Y., Yoon, C. H., Boehm, J. S., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-08-11
Volume
548
Issue
7667
Pages
343-346
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2744996861
Cited by
422
References
44
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-scale activation screen identifies a lncRNA locus regulating a gene neighbourhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature23451
The paper
Joung, J., Engreitz, J. M., Konermann, S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Verdine, V. K., Aguet, F., Gootenberg, J. S., Sanjana, N. E., Wright, J. B., Fulco, C. P., Tseng, Y.-Y., Yoon, C. H., Boehm, J. S., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2017). Genome-scale activation screen identifies a lncRNA locus regulating a gene neighbourhood. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.