Cited by 870Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Identification of essential genes for cancer immunotherapy

Open access
Patel, Shashank J., Sanjana, Neville E., Kishton, Rigel J., Eidizadeh, Arash, Vodnala, Suman K., Cam, Maggie, Gartner, Jared J., Jia, Li +16 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Somatic gene mutations can alter the vulnerability of cancer cells to T-cell-based immunotherapies. Here we perturbed genes in human melanoma cells to mimic loss-of-function mutations involved in resistance to these therapies, by using a genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 library that consisted of around 123,000 single-guide RNAs, and profiled genes whose loss in tumour cells impaired the effector function of CD8+ T cells. The genes that were most enriched in the screen have key roles in antigen presentation and interferon-γ signalling, and correlate with cytolytic activity in patient tumours from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Among the genes validated using different cancer cell lines and antigens, we identified multiple loss-of-function mutations in APLNR, encoding the apelin receptor, in patient tumours that were refractory to immunotherapy. We show that APLNR interacts with JAK1, modulating interferon-γ responses in tumours, and that its functional loss reduces the efficacy of adoptive cell transfer and checkpoint blockade immunotherapies in mouse models. Our results link the loss of essential genes for the effector function of CD8+ T cells with the resistance or non-responsiveness of cancer to immunotherapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23477

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no known mouse homolog of CD58.

    “Notably, there is no known mouse homolog of CD58, emphasizing the value of performing such screens in human models10.”
  • CRISPR/Cas9 KO screens in murine models or engineered human cell lines identified putative novel immune evasion mechanisms involving chromatin regulators, TNFα signaling, SOX4, PTPN2, and APLNR, but their clinical relevance is unclear.

    “CRISPR/Cas9 KO screens in murine models or engineered human cell lines testing tumor-T cell interactions identified putative novel mechanisms of immune evasion involving chromatin regulators10, TNFα signaling11, SOX412, PTPN213, and APLNR10, yet their clinical relevance is unclear.”
  • sgRNAs have a structure suitable for direct capture: the variable targeting region is at the 5' end and the 3' end is an invariant scaffold.

    “sgRNAs have a structure that lends themselves to direct capture: the variable region that guides Cas9 to its target site is at the 5’ end while the 3’ end is an invariant scaffold25,26.”
  • Previous screens used antigen-specific T cells targeting model tumor-associated antigens such as OVA, gp100, and NY-ESO-1.

    “In previous screens, antigen-specific T cells targeting model tumor associated antigen (TAA), such as OVA, gp100, and NY-ESO-1, were used (Manguso et al., 2017; Pan et al., 2018; Patel et al., 2017).”

    From Protein Barcodes Enable High-Dimensional Single-Cell CRISPR Screens (2018) · cites this paper as Patel et al., 2017

  • These findings are consistent with clinical data correlating resistance to checkpoint inhibitors with mutations in B2m and IFNγ pathways and with recent genome-wide CRISPR screening data.

    “These findings are consistent with emerging clinical data correlating resistance to checkpoint inhibitors with mutations in the B2m and IFNγ pathways (Gao et al., 2016; Zaretsky et al., 2016), and with recent genome-wide CRISPR screening data (Patel et al., 2017).”

    From Protein Barcodes Enable High-Dimensional Single-Cell CRISPR Screens (2018) · cites this paper as Patel et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 870

Authors
Patel, S. J., Sanjana, N. E., Kishton, R. J., Eidizadeh, A., Vodnala, S. K., Cam, M., Gartner, J. J., Jia, L., Steinberg, S. M., Yamamoto, T. N., Merchant, A. S., Mehta, G. U., Chichura, A., Shalem, O., Tran, E., Eil, R., Sukumar, M., Guijarro, E. P., Day, C.-P., Robbins, P., Feldman, S., Merlino, G., Zhang, F., & Restifo, N. P.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Patel, Shashank J.
  • Sanjana, Neville E.
  • Restifo, Nicholas P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-08
Volume
548
Issue
7669
Pages
537-542
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2744743363
Cited by
870
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 21
FWCI
42.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R00HG008171)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Moonshot Research and Development Program
  • Cancer Moonshot
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
cancer immunotherapy resistance, melanoma, CD8+ T cell effector function, CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screen, apelin receptor, JAK1, interferon-gamma signaling, MHC class I antigen presentation, adoptive cell transfer, immune checkpoint blockade, T cell cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Apelin, Apelin Receptors, Animals, Female, Humans, Immunotherapy, Interferon-gamma, Melanoma, Mutation, Neoplasms, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic, Reproducibility of Results, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Genome, Antigen Presentation, Adoptive Transfer, Genes, Essential, Cell Line, Tumor, Knowledge Bases, Mice, Janus Kinase 1, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review