The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune
Open accessAbstract
Much remains to be learned about the biology of mushrooms, which are an important source of food as well as secondary metabolites and enzymes of biotechnological importance. Ohm et al. report the sequence of the genetically tractable species Schizophyllum commune and identify genes involved in the formation of fruiting bodies and the degradation of lignocellulose. Much remains to be learned about the biology of mushroom-forming fungi, which are an important source of food, secondary metabolites and industrial enzymes. The wood-degrading fungus Schizophyllum commune is both a genetically tractable model for studying mushroom development and a likely source of enzymes capable of efficient degradation of lignocellulosic biomass. Comparative analyses of its 38.5-megabase genome, which encodes 13,210 predicted genes, reveal the species's unique wood-degrading machinery. One-third of the 471 genes predicted to encode transcription factors are differentially expressed during sexual development of S. commune. Whereas inactivation of one of these, fst4, prevented mushroom formation, inactivation of another, fst3, resulted in more, albeit smaller, mushrooms than in the wild-type fungus. Antisense transcripts may also have a role in the formation of fruiting bodies. Better insight into the mechanisms underlying mushroom formation should affect commercial production of mushrooms and their industrial use for producing enzymes and pharmaceuticals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
The Pfam protein families database
Finn, R. D., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J. E., Gavin, O. L., Gunasekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985 · Cited by 2,694
Gene expression analysis by massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) on microbead arrays.
Brenner, S., Johnson, M., Bridgham, J., Golda, G., Lloyd, D. H., Johnson, D., Luo, S., McCurdy, S., Foy, M., Ewan, M., et al. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/76469 · Cited by 1,360
McCarroll, S. A., Murphy, C. T., Zou, S., Pletcher, S. D., Chin, C.-S., Jan, Y. N., Kenyon, C., Bargmann, C. I., & Li, H. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1291 · Cited by 454
Cited by
MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes
Grigoriev, I. V., Nikitin, R., Haridas, S., Kuo, A., Ohm, R., Otillar, R., Riley, R., Salamov, A., Zhao, X., Korzeniewski, F., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · Cited by 1,498
Self-citationLignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution
Janusz, G., Pawlik, A., Sulej, J., Świderska-Burek, U., Jarosz-Wilkołazka, A., & Paszczyński, A. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux049 · Cited by 984
Riley, R., Salamov, A. A., Brown, D. W., Nagy, L. G., Floudas, D., Held, B. W., Levasseur, A., Lombard, V., Morin, E., Otillar, R., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400592111 · Cited by 745
Self-citationGenome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better
Raffaele, S., & Kamoun, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2790 · Cited by 732
Obligate biotrophy features unraveled by the genomic analysis of rust fungi
Duplessis, S., Cuomo, C. A., Lin, Y.-C., Aerts, A., Tisserant, E., Veneault-Fourrey, C., Joly, D. L., Hacquard, S., Amselem, J., Cantarel, B. L., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019315108 · Cited by 729
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohm, R. A., de Jong, J. F., Lugones, L. G., Aerts, A., Kothe, E., Stajich, J. E., de Vries, R. P., Record, E., Levasseur, A., Baker, S. E., Bartholomew, K. A., Coutinho, P. M., Erdmann, S., Fowler, T. J., Gathman, A. C., Lombard, V., Henrissat, B., Knabe, N., Kües, U., Lilly, W. W., Lindquist, E., Lucas, S., Magnuson, J. K., Piumi, F., Raudaskoski, M., Salamov, A., Schmutz, J., Schwarze, F. W. M. R., vanKuyk, P. A., Horton, J. S., Grigoriev, I. V., & Wösten, H. A. B.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2010-07-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 957-963
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W1982390665
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt.1643
- The paper
- Ohm, R. A., de Jong, J. F., Lugones, L. G., Aerts, A., Kothe, E., Stajich, J. E., de Vries, R. P., Record, E., Levasseur, A., Baker, S. E., Bartholomew, K. A., Coutinho, P. M., Erdmann, S., Fowler, T. J., Gathman, A. C., Lombard, V., Henrissat, B., Knabe, N., Kües, U., . . . Wösten, H. A. B. (2010). Genome sequence of the model mushroom Schizophyllum commune. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
