The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A community computational challenge to predict the activity of pairs of compounds
Open accessAbstract
Recent therapeutic successes have renewed interest in drug combinations, but experimental screening approaches are costly and often identify only small numbers of synergistic combinations. The DREAM consortium launched an open challenge to foster the development of in silico methods to computationally rank 91 compound pairs, from the most synergistic to the most antagonistic, based on gene-expression profiles of human B cells treated with individual compounds at multiple time points and concentrations. Using scoring metrics based on experimental dose-response curves, we assessed 32 methods (31 community-generated approaches and SynGen), four of which performed significantly better than random guessing. We highlight similarities between the methods. Although the accuracy of predictions was not optimal, we find that computational prediction of compound-pair activity is possible, and that community challenges can be useful to advance the field of in silico compound-synergy prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Initiatives like the DREAM Challenges,284 MoleculeNet,110 and Therapeutic Data Commons285 offer benchmark data sets across a wide spectrum of prediction tasks for pharmacology.”
From Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [284]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer
Vermorken, J. B., Mesia, R., Rivera, F., Remenar, E., Kawecki, A., Rottey, S., Erfan, J., Zabolotnyy, D., Kienzer, H.-R., Cupissol, D., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0802656 · Cited by 3,726
Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data
Olshen, A. B., Venkatraman, E. S., Lucito, R., & Wigler, M. H. (2004) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxh008 · Cited by 2,304
Addiction to Oncogenes--the Achilles Heal of Cancer
Weinstein, I. B. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073096 · Cited by 1,764
Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
The DREAM5 Consortium, Marbach, D., Costello, J. C., Küffner, R., Vega, N. M., Prill, R. J., Camacho, D. M., Allison, K. R., Kellis, M., Collins, J. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2016 · Cited by 1,667
Self-citationBokemeyer, C., Bondarenko, I., Makhson, A. M., Hartmann, J. T., Aparicio, J., de Braud, F., Donea, S., Ludwig, H., Schuch, G., Stroh, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.8397 · Cited by 1,646
Green, M. R., Monti, S., Rodig, S. J., Juszczyński, P., Currie, T., O'Donnell, E., Chapuy, B., Takeyama, K., Neuberg, D. S., Golub, T. R., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-282780 · Cited by 1,320
The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours
Carro, M. S., Lim, W. K., Alvarez, M. J., Bollo, R. J., Zhao, X., Snyder, E. Y., Sulman, E. P., Anne, S. L., Doetsch, F. K., Colman, H., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08712 · Cited by 1,268
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Chen, J.C. et al. Regulatory network based analysis of genetic alterations reveals deletion of KLHL9 E3 ligase complex adapter protein as a driver of mesenchymal signature in glioblastoma. Cell (in the press).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks
Zitnik, M., Agrawal, M., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294 · Cited by 1,501
Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks
Camacho, D. M., Collins, K. M., Powers, R. K., Costello, J. C., & Collins, J. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.015 · Cited by 1,012
Self-citationDrug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century
Tyers, M., & Wright, G. D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-018-0141-x · Cited by 849
Network-based prediction of drug combinations
Cheng, F., Kovács, I. A., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09186-x · Cited by 819
Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity
Alizadeh, A. A., Aranda, V., Bardelli, A., Blanpain, C., Bock, C., Borowski, C., Caldas, C., Califano, A., Doherty, M., Elsner, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3915 · Cited by 760
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Community, N.-D., Bansal, M., Yang, J., Karan, C., Menden, M. P., Costello, J. C., Tang, H., Xiao, G., Li, Y., Allen, J., Zhong, R., Chen, B., Kim, M., Wang, T., Heiser, L. M., Realubit, R., Mattioli, M., Alvarez, M. J., Shen, Y., Gallahan, D., Singer, D., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Xie, Y., Stolovitzky, G., & Califano, A.
- Affiliations
- Center for Genomic Science (IT)
- Columbia University (US)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- Boston University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Yang
- Stolovitzky, Gustavo
- Califano, Andrea
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2014-11-17
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1213-1222
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- PMC
- PMC4399794
- OpenAlex
- W2036291018
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- İYTE (İZMİR YÜKSEK TEKNOLOJİ ENSTİTÜSÜ) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- IYTE GCRIS Database (Izmir Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP101251)
- Wellcome Trust (104104)
- National Institutes of Health (RP101251)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL111566)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG003284)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA121852, CA-112970, U01CA164184, U01CA168426, R01CA152301, P50CA058207, P30CA016672, U54CA112970)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM071966, R01GM081871)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- combination therapy, antagonism, in silico prediction, DREAM challenge, community problems, gene expression profiles, human B cells, dose-response curves, syngens
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, B-Lymphocytes, Computer Simulation, Drug Combinations, Drug Synergism, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
