Cited by 362Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

High-throughput identification of genotype-specific cancer vulnerabilities in mixtures of barcoded tumor cell lines

Open access
Yu, Channing, Mannan, Aristotle M, Yvone, Griselda Metta, Ross, Kenneth N, Zhang, Yan-Ling, Marton, Melissa A, Taylor, Bradley R, Crenshaw, Andrew +13 more·2016·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Hundreds of genetically characterized cell lines are available for the discovery of genotype-specific cancer vulnerabilities. However, screening large numbers of compounds against large numbers of cell lines is currently impractical, and such experiments are often difficult to control. Here we report a method called PRISM that allows pooled screening of mixtures of cancer cell lines by labeling each cell line with 24-nucleotide barcodes. PRISM revealed the expected patterns of cell killing seen in conventional (unpooled) assays. In a screen of 102 cell lines across 8,400 compounds, PRISM led to the identification of BRD-7880 as a potent and highly specific inhibitor of aurora kinases B and C. Cell line pools also efficiently formed tumors as xenografts, and PRISM recapitulated the expected pattern of erlotinib sensitivity in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3460

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mining correlations between cytotoxicity of 4,518 clinical and preclinical small molecules and E3 ligase expression across hundreds of cancer cell lines identified CR8, a CDK inhibitor, as a molecular glue degrader.

    “Through systematic mining of databases for correlations between the cytotoxicity of 4,518 clinical and pre-clinical small molecules and E3 ligase expression levels across hundreds of human cancer cell lines,3–5 we identified CR8, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor,6 as a compound that acts as a molecular glue degrader.”

    From The CDK inhibitor CR8 acts as a molecular glue degrader that depletes cyclin K (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes correlating compound sensitivity with gene expression across cancer cell lines, supporting the database-mining approach attributed to this source. But this paper reports screening 8,400 compounds in 102 lines, not 4,518 compounds across hundreds of lines, and the cited passages do not identify E3 ligase expression as the correlate. The sentence presents CR8's identification as the citing authors’ own finding, not this source’s. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, C., Mannan, A. M., Yvone, G. M., Ross, K. N., Zhang, Y.-L., Marton, M. A., Taylor, B. R., Crenshaw, A., Gould, J. Z., Tamayo, P., Weir, B. A., Tsherniak, A., Wong, B., Garraway, L. A., Shamji, A. F., Palmer, M. A., Foley, M. A., Winckler, W., Schreiber, S. L., Kung, A. L., & Golub, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Golub, Todd R
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
419-423
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2294990791
Cited by
362
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • Conquer Cancer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (RL1HG004671)
  • National Cancer Institute (RL1CA133834, U54CA112962)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (RL1GM084437)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (UL1DE019585)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PRISM, compound screening, Aurora kinase inhibitors, xenograft tumor formation, cancer cell lines
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review