The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein-protein interaction networks and biology—what's the connection?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably, edges are susceptible to ascertainment biases52,214,215 and confounding factors that can induce spurious relationships178 (FIG. 2b).”
From Systems biology and gene networks in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (2015) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Error and attack tolerance of complex networksPreprint
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2000) · Cited by 6,554
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
Jeong, H., Mason, S., Barabási, A., & Oltvai, Z. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075138 · Cited by 5,327
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks
Maslov, S., & Sneppen, K. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065103 · Cited by 3,051
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,964
Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery
Gavin, A., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Böesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L. J., Bastuck, S., Dümpelfeld, B., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04532 · Cited by 2,570
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 201
Sinapic Acid Inhibits Group IIA Secretory Phospholipase A2 and Its Inflammatory Response in Mice
Giresha, A. S., Urs, D., Pundalik, S., Meti, R. S., Pramod, S. N., Supreetha, B. H., Somegowda, M., Dharmappa, K. K., El‐Shehawi, A. M., Albogami, S. M., et al. (2022) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox11071251 · Cited by 12
“In the living system, protein–protein interactions lead to pharmacological damage due to the synergistic effect [85].”
BackgroundCliques in mitotic spindle network bring kinetochore‐associated complexes to form dependence pathway
Chen, T.-C., Lee, S., Chan, C., Juang, Y., Hong, Y., Huang, Y.-H., Lai, J., Kao, C., & Huang, C. F. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900231 · Cited by 12
“However, large-scale PPI studies are the major source to provide the potential targets among the enormous number of unknown proteins and missing links in the network [13].”
BackgroundNagamani, S., Gaur, A. S., Tanneeru, K., Muneeswaran, G., Madugula, S. S., MPDS Consortium, Druzhilovskiy, D. S., Poroikov, V., & Sastry, G. N. (2017) · SAR and QSAR in environmental research · doi:10.1080/1062936x.2017.1402819 · Cited by 11
“A completely constructed interactome with all possible molecular interactions could form a base to understand human disease networks [26].”
BackgroundHase, T., Niimura, Y., & Tanaka, H. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-358 · Cited by 12
“[28] pointed out that multiple validation introduces another problem: interactions observed at least twice will be biased towards well-studied proteins, such as those from particular cellular environments or highly expressed ones.”
BackgroundThe properties of hub proteins in a yeast‐aggregated cell cycle network and its phase sub‐networks
Wu, X., Guo, J., Zhang, D., & Lin, K. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200900053 · Cited by 12
“In conclusion, the analysis of dynamic architecture of the cell cycle subsystem can serve as a supplement for the current studies of the yeast cell cycle and will be helpful for understanding the complete network topology underlying the molecular machinery of complex phenotypes [38].”
BackgroundEvolutionary Characteristics of Bacterial Two-Component Systems
Sheng, X., Huvet, M., Pinney, J. W., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3567-9_6 · Cited by 11
“More generally, defining what is meant by a system is always going to be based on ad-hoc and potentially subjective criteria [9–13].”
BackgroundSelf-citationIdentification of Protein–Protein Interaction Associated Functions Based on Gene Ontology
Zhang, Y., Huang, F., Li, J., Shen, W., Chen, L., Feng, K., Huang, T., & Cai, Y. (2024) · The Protein Journal · doi:10.1007/s10930-024-10180-6 · Cited by 10
“Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) encompass any direct or indirect biochemical events associated with two or more proteins, featuring functional relevance [1–3].”
A disease-drug-phenotype matrix inferred by walking on a functional domain network
Fang, H., & Gough, J. (2013) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c3mb25495j · Cited by 10
Li, L., Zhang, N., & Li, S. (2010) · Chinese Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-010-4067-6 · Cited by 10
Li, S., Choi, K. P., Wu, T., & Zhang, L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2013.14 · Cited by 10
“We show that for a plausible evolutionary history of a PPI network, its relative quality, measured by the so-called loss number, is independent of the growth parameters of the network and can be computed efficiently.”
BackgroundMartínez-Enguita, D., Dwivedi, S. K., Jörnsten, R. J., & Gustafsson, M. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad293 · Cited by 10
Topological Characteristics of Molecular Networks
Milenković, T., & Pržulj, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0320-3_2 · Cited by 9
Evolution in protein interaction networks: co-evolution, rewiring and the role of duplication
Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C. (2009) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0370768 · Cited by 9
Self-citationA network-based pathway-expanding approach for pathway analysis
Zhang, Q. E., Li, J., Xie, H., Xue, H., & Wang, Y. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1333-x · Cited by 9
“However, existing PPI networks cannot accurately describe the interactions between proteins in specific conditions and have different degrees of false positive and false negative results because most large-scale PPI networks are obtained in different experimental conditions, predicted/extracted using different algorit…”
BackgroundPromiscuous domains: facilitating stability of the yeast protein–protein interaction network
Pang, E., Tan, T., & Lin, K. (2011) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c1mb05364g · Cited by 9
The Voronoi diagram for graphs and its application in the Sickle Cell Disease research
Zivanic, M., Daescu, O., Kurdia, A., & Goodman, S. R. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2011.10.006 · Cited by 9
The Degree Distribution of Networks: Statistical Model Selection
Kelly, W., Ingram, P. J., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_13 · Cited by 9
Ozen, M., Emamian, E. S., & Abdi, A. (2023) · Archives of Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.33696/pharmacol.4.043 · Cited by 10
Binding interface change and cryptic variation in the evolution of protein-protein interactions
Ames, R. M., Talavera, D., Williams, S. G., Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C. (2016) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0608-1 · Cited by 8
“Likewise the set of all known physical interactions may contain both false negatives and false positives [52].”
Self-citationGladilin, E. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170953 · Cited by 8
Clustering and visualizing similarity networks of membrane proteins
Hu, G., Mai, T., & Chen, C. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24832 · Cited by 8
Bulgakov, V. P., & Tsitsiashvili, G. S. (2013) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297913100039 · Cited by 8
Modelling Biological Networks via Tailored Random Graphs
Coolen, A. C. C., Fraternali, F., Annibale, A., Fernandes, L. P., & Kleinjung, J. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119970606.ch15 · Cited by 8
“Both links and nodes will be under-sampled, and the sampling is likely to be biased (Hakes et al. 2008).”
BackgroundCheminformatics and Bioinformatics at the Interface with Systems Biology
Kaushik, A. C., Mehmood, A., Wei, D., Nawab, S., Sahi, S., & Kumar, A. (2023) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781839166037 · Cited by 7
Graph-Theory Based Simplification Techniques for Efficient Biological Network Analysis
Ko, E., Kang, M., Chang, H. J., & Kim, D. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) · doi:10.1109/bigdataservice.2017.39 · Cited by 8
Fierst, J. L., & Phillips, P. C. (2012) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evs083 · Cited by 7
“…et al. 2006), but numerous studies indicate that understanding biological networks requires a deeper understanding of biological processes and mechanisms (e.g., Hahn et al. 2004; Wang and Zhang 2007; Hakes et al. 2008; Jovelin and Phillips 2009; Agarwal et al. 2010; Podder and Ghosh 2010).”
BackgroundGanapathiraju, M. K., & Orii, N. (2013) · GigaScience · doi:10.1186/2047-217x-2-11 · Cited by 7
“Inferring biological conclusions from topology of a partially-known network will be influenced by the sampling biases that can alter the underlying structure of the network in unpredictable ways [47].”
BackgroundNetwork-Based Analysis for Biological Discovery
Tripathi, L. P., Chen, Y. A., Mizuguchi, K., & Murakami, Y. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20674-2 · Cited by 7
Network Science and Machine Learning for Precision Nutrition
Sebek, M., & Menichetti, G. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15315-0.00012-2 · Cited by 6
Jeong, H., & Yoon, B.-J. (2017) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-017-0404-6 · Cited by 6
“Since current PPI networks are incomplete and noisy – with many false positive interactions as well as false negative interactions [21, 22] – adding pseudo-edges to the reduced target network can lead to more reliable querying results, as will be demonstrated in our simulation results.”
ResultHigh-Throughput Analyses and Curation of Protein Interactions in Yeast
Wodak, S. J., Vlasblom, J., & Pu, S. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-173-4_22 · Cited by 6
The Graph Landscape: using visual analytics for graph set analysis
Kennedy, A. D. M., Klein, K., Nguyen, A., & Wang, F. Y. (2016) · Journal of Visualization · doi:10.1007/s12650-016-0374-6 · Cited by 6
“Table 1 gives an overview on several popular properties described in the literature and online graph collections, e.g., (Batagelj 2009; Doncheva et al. 2012; Hakes et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2011) (The Graph Archive: http://www.graph-archive.org; House of Graphs: http://hog.grinvin.org/).”
BackgroundAlvarez‐Ponce, D. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw075 · Cited by 6
Ibragimov, R., Martens, J., Guo, J., & Baumbach, J. (2013) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/2464576.2464600 · Cited by 6
“Here, we concentrate on protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, where evolutionary preserved topology infers preservation of biological function [5].”
BackgroundNetworks in nature: dynamics, evolution, and modularity
Agarwal, S. (2012) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · doi:10.5287/ora-xr1x2v5o5 · Cited by 6
Enhancing the Functional Content of Eukaryotic Protein Interaction Networks
Pandey, G. S., Arora, S., Manocha, S., & Whalen, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109130 · Cited by 5
“, the absence of biologically valid interactions from the currently available data sets [8,9,11].”
BackgroundA comprehensive survey of drug–target interaction analysis in allopathy and siddha medicine
Uma, E., Mala, T., Geetha, A. V., & Priyanka, D. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102986 · Cited by 6
Analysis of Human gene - Disease association as a Social network
Doke, A. R. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2019/12842019 · Cited by 5
“Rob Cross tool is advanced in terms of functionality but membership to Network Roundtable is required.”
BackgroundInfluentialReconstruction of Network Evolutionary History from Extant Network Topology and Duplication History
Li, S., Choi, K. P., Wu, T., & Zhang, L. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30191-9_16 · Cited by 4
“Recent progress in experimental systems biology provides us with an unprecedented amount of genome-wide protein-protein interaction (PPI) data [7].”
BackgroundProtein-Protein Interaction Networks: Structures, Evolution, and Application to Drug Design
Hase, T., & Niimura, Y. (2012) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/36665 · Cited by 4
“It has been pointed out that genome-wide PIN data identified by high-throughput experiments contains a large number of false positive interactions (Hakes et al. 2008).”
Krishnan, A., Khan, F. I., Sukumar, S., & Khan, M. K. A. (2023) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2279699 · Cited by 4
“The knowledge of the topological and statistical characteristics of interaction networks and their connections to the key proteins helps to better comprehend the interactions between protein targets for drugs and other proteins (Hakes et al., 2008).”
Affinity and Chemical Enrichment for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Analyses
Adelmant, G., Cardoza, J. D., Ficarro, S. B., Sikorski, T. W., Zhang, Y., & Marto, J. A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0828-0_22 · Cited by 4
Tying new knots in synthetic biology
Karig, D., & Simpson, M. L. (2008) · HFSP journal · doi:10.2976/1.2907240 · Cited by 4
“Thus, the underlying set of reactions which can impact the synthetic circuit, either directly or via competition for cell resources, is large, complex, and difficult to discern (Hakes et al., 2008).”
Tahara, S., & Ozaki, H. (2025) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elaf016 · Cited by 3
“Similar biases have been widely recognized in other biological datasets, including drug–target interactions [45] and protein–protein interactions [46], where they are known to impact the validity and accuracy of computational analyses, machine learning predictions, and downstream interpretations…”
A survey of human histone H1 subtypes interaction networks: Implications for histones H1 functioning
Kowalski, A. (2021) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26059 · Cited by 3
Pollet, L., Lambourne, L., & Xia, Y. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167750 · Cited by 3
Dikicioǧlu, D., Nightingale, D. J. H., Wood, V., Lilley, K. S., & Oliver, S. G. (2019) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/foz014 · Cited by 3
Interactions of HIV-1 Proteins as Targets for Developing Anti-HIV-1 Peptides
Chandra, K., Maes, M., & Friedler, A. (2015) · Future Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4155/fmc.15.46 · Cited by 3
Module Finding Approaches for Protein Interaction Networks
Aittokallio, T. A. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-398-2.ch018 · Cited by 3
Random Graph Models and Their Application to Protein–Protein Interaction Networks
Higham, D. J., & Pržulj, N. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119970606.ch14 · Cited by 3
“However, this data is known to admit very high levels of uncertainty [5, 8, 17, 18, 45].”
BackgroundDecoding protein binding plasticity via integrated deep ribosome display and deep learning
Tang, M., Li, J., Li, Z., Cui, J., & Qi, H. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09160-y · Cited by 2
“Protein interactions commonly exhibit promiscuity, a notable trait that empowers proteins to engage with a wide-ranging array of partners 1 .”
Global Protein Interaction Network for Trypanosoma cruzi.
Azimi, A., Gaudreault, F., Sulea, T., & Salavati, R. (2025) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00649 · Cited by 2
From Topology to Phenotype in Protein–Protein Interaction Networks
Pržulj, N. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-396-1_3 · Cited by 2
Transcriptome-Wide Gene Expression in a Murine Model of Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
Zhao, L., Zhu, G., Zhou, C., Wang, H., Yu, L., Xu, Y., Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2021/5535890 · Cited by 2
“PPI represents the process of forming a protein complex by noncovalent bonding between proteins [14].”
BackgroundAbdelsattar, M., Nassar, A. E., Mousa, K. H., Hussein, A., El-Baghdady, M. M. S., Radwan, K. H., Ibrahim, M. S., Allali, A. E., Hamwieh, A., Alsamman, A. M., et al. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11661-3 · Cited by 2
“The Study of protein interaction networks can provide insights into functional relationships and cellular pathways [53].”
Building a Pluripotency Protein Interaction Network for Embryonic Stem Cells
Ng, P. M. L., & Lufki, T. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/23634 · Cited by 2
Chromatin Regulation and Gene Centrality Are Essential for Controlling Fitness Pleiotropy in Yeast
Zhou, L., Ma, X., Arbeitman, M. N., & Sun, F. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008086 · Cited by 2
Marcatili, P., & Tramontano, A. L. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-398-2.ch006 · Cited by 2
Random Walk Based Global Feature for Disease Gene Identification
Wei, L., Wu, S., Zhang, J., & Xu, Y. D. (2016) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3005-5_38 · Cited by 2
Structure and resilience of bald eagle roost networks
Watts, B. D., & Dyer, R. J. (2018) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/wsb.865 · Cited by 2
“Network analysis has been applied to a variety of biological systems ranging from proteins (Gardner et al. 2003, Hakes et al. 2008), metabolism (Jeong et al. 2000), and food webs (Montoya et al. 2009) to ecosystems (Patten et al. 1990, Manfred 2006), among others.”
MethodAnalyses of Complex Genome-Scale Biological Networks
Muley, V. Y., & Acharya, V. (2012) · SpringerBriefs in systems biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4705-4_5 · Cited by 2
Detection of construction biases in biological databases: the case of miRBasePreprint
Saturnino, G. B., Godinho, C. P. D. S., Fagundes-Lima, D., Silva, A. C. E., & Weber, G. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1407.6570 · Cited by 2
“We believe that this substantiates some of the criticism that indis-criminate interpretation of network topology has received recently [38, 39].”
ResultShen, R., Wang, X., & Guda, C. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/146365 · Cited by 1
“PPI networks represent the cross talk among groups of proteins, which have a wide range of biological implications [1, 2].”
BackgroundIdentification of protein interaction methods from biomedical literature
Jhamb, D., Krishnan, A., Palakal, M., Pandit, Y., Palakal, M. J., & Duraiswamy, P. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/iccabs.2014.6863923 · Cited by 1
Annibale, A., Coolen, A. C. C., & Planell-Morell, N. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0573 · Cited by 2
“Moreover, different experiments measure protein interactions in different ways, which causes further biases [1–3].”
BackgroundKennedy, A. D. M., Klein, K., & Nguyen, A. (2015) · International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction (VINCI) · doi:10.1145/2801040.2801059 · Cited by 1
“There is a wide variety of graph properties that might be relevant for analysis, which are described and used in literature and online services, e.g. [15, 36, 11, 18, 5, 6].”
BackgroundGene Networks in Neuropsychiatric Disease
Parikshak, N., & Geschwind, D. H. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800105-9.00011-1 · Cited by 1
A Network Target-based Approach for Evaluating Multicomponent Synergy
Li, S., Ningbo, Z., & Zhang, B. (2010) · Cited by 1
Disease Diagnosis and Management Using Bioinformatics and Cyber-Physical Systems
Rout, T., Mohapatra, A., Kar, M., & Muduly, D. K. (2025) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5734-3_9 · Cited by 1
Evaluating the protein–protein binding via the fast pulling of ligand scheme
Nguyen, H. A., Vu, V. V., Truong, V. K., Huynh, L. K., Lenon, G. B., & Ngo, S. T. (2025) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2025.142136 · Cited by 1
Applications of the In Vitro Virus (IVV) Method for Various Protein Functional Analyses
Tabata, N., Horisawa, K., & Yanagaw, H. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/55483 · Cited by 1
Identifying Hub Proteins and Their Essentiality from Protein-protein Interaction Network
Bakar, S. A., Taheri, J., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1109/bibe.2011.67 · Cited by 1
“as proven in [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [27].”
BackgroundThe amyloid interactome 2: mapping protein aggregation
Nastou, K. C., Tsiolaki, P. L., & Iconomidou, V. A. (2019) · Amyloid · doi:10.1080/13506129.2019.1582499 · Cited by 1
“Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks have long been utilized as tools, in order to gain useful insights into disease mechanisms [2].”
BackgroundScalable module detection for attributed networks with applications to breast cancer
Yu, H., & Blair, R. H. (2020) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2020.1803811 · Cited by 1
“Importantly, networks of this type have implicit bias that can manifest in unpredictable ways [18].”
BackgroundDrug contraindications in comorbid diseases: a protein interactome perspective
Karunakaran, K. B., Ganapathiraju, M. K., Jain, S., Brahmachari, S. K., & Balakrishnan, N. (2024) · Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1007/s13721-023-00440-3 · Cited by 1
“Hence, network overlaps may have been underestimated due to the inherent incompleteness of these disease networks, the tendency of incomplete networks to exhibit small overlaps and sampling biases introduced as a result of selective PPI discovery (Hakes et al. 2008).”
Colorectal Cancer and Its Molecular Subsystems: Construction, Interpretation, and Validation
Patel, V. N., & Chance, M. R. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527665471.ch7 · Cited by 1
Network-Based Analysis for Biological Knowledge Discovery
Tripathi, L. P., Osorio, R. S. A., Murakami, Y., Chen, Y. A., & Mizuguchi, K. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95502-7.00272-4 · Cited by 1
Guo, L., Pan, H., Nian, X., & Bing, Z. (2015) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc.2015.7161910
“On the other hand, the accuracy of experimental PPI data was often questionable [8-10].”
BackgroundA More Robust Corpus of Büchi Automata
Fisher, C. S. (2015) · Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University)
Wu, P.-J., Wu, W., Chen, T.-C., Lin, K., Lai, J.-M., Huang, C. F., & Wang, F. (2014) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2014.07.006
The Structure of Cross-Functional Process Model Collections: An Empirical Investigation
Sanz, J. L. C., Suárez, F., Calmon, A. D. P., & Becker, V. (2014) · IEEE Conference on Business Informatics · doi:10.1109/cbi.2014.57
“the graph resembles similar forms to those arising in some domains in social networks, physics, Internet, biology and other sciences [1], [2], [9], [11], [13], [31], [32].”
BackgroundBakar, S. A., Taheri, J., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2013)
Condition-specific differential subnetwork analysis for biological systems
Jhamb, D. (2015) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · doi:10.7912/c2/947
Zhu, C. (2013) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
dos Santos, R. N. (2016) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.76.2016.tde-02022016-163931
Zhang, M. (2012) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Organisation of the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in protein transactions in yeastPreprint
Dikicioǧlu, D., Nightingale, D. J. H., Wood, V., Lilley, K. S., & Oliver, S. G. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/229039
“Identification of the features of the PT interaction networks that were different from those of the global interaction networks of yeast raised two related questions regarding the topological analysis of biological systems: (i) Did these system-specific characteristics appear due to the fact that the global network wa…”
BackgroundReconstruction of Network Evolutionary History from Extant Network Topology and Duplication HistoryPreprint
Li, S., Choi, K. P., Wu, T., & Zhang, L. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.2430
“Recent progress in experimental systems biology provides us with an unprecedented amount of genome-wide protein-protein interaction (PPI) data [7].”
BackgroundHost-specific Signature Identification for Influenza A Using An Adjusted Entropy MeasurementPreprint
Zhang, Y., Eskridge, K. M., Zhang, S., & Lu, G. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-622516/v1
Azuaje, D. F. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470686423.refs
Martínez-Enguita, D., Dwivedi, S. K., Jörnsten, R. J., & Gustafsson, M. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.07.531501
“They are prone to research biases, as studies may focus on well-known proteins or interactions that are easier to detect [3] [4] [5].”
BackgroundMolecular Investigation of Protein–Protein Interaction Candidates Related to the Mammalian Brain
(2023) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781839166037-00081
A Machine Learning Technique for the Identification of Hub Protein of Gastric Cancer
Mallick, A., Das, A. K., Thakur, A. K., Giri, A., Gupta, C. P., & Ghoshal, N. (2025) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9532-1_13
Link prediction for biomedical network reconstruction
Cao, Z., Pan, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Guan, J., Zhou, S., & Ou, C. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.131144
Mechanistic Bayesian Networks for Integrating Knowledge and Data to Unravel Biological Complexity
Shah, A. (2011) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Géométrie des interactions protéiques
Dequeker, C. (2018) · doi:10.70675/e2579bb6zb2d7z4a4czb4b4zb35b76a5e3c1
Étude multi-omics des mutations des isocitrates déshydrogénases dans les leucémies aiguës myéloïdes
Hucteau, A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2ddbfecfzaa70z4d57z87cbzbcc9f3c01cc6
Graph designs for deep learning–based multi-omics integration
Alif, M. N., Ahmed, K. T., Baul, S., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag410
“However, they may be limited by incomplete or biased curation, often favoring well-studied entities and lacking context-specific or dynamic regulation [ 141, 142].”
Thomas, A., Fournier, L. M., Jung, V., Patani, R., Pascal Frossard, B., Luisier, R., & Vincent-Cuaz, C. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.08.750135
“Proteins exert their functions through molecular interactions that vary across cell types, physiological states, and disease contexts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakes, L., Pinney, J. W., Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-72
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2165160727
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F007620/1, BB/C515412/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction network, network analysis
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Binding Sites, Biology, Protein Binding, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Transduction, Information Storage and Retrieval, Artifacts, Proteome, Protein Interaction Mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review