Cited by 483Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksScientific Computing and Data Management

Using process diagrams for the graphical representation of biological networks

Kitano, Hiroaki, Funahashi, Akira, Matsuoka, Yukiko, Oda, Kanae·2005·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

With the increased interest in understanding biological networks, such as protein-protein interaction networks and gene regulatory networks, methods for representing and communicating such networks in both human- and machine-readable form have become increasingly important. Although there has been significant progress in machine-readable representation of networks, as exemplified by the Systems Biology Mark-up Language (SBML) (http://www.sbml.org) issues in human-readable representation have been largely ignored. This article discusses human-readable diagrammatic representations and proposes a set of notations that enhances the formality and richness of the information represented. The process diagram is a fully state transition-based diagram that can be translated into machine-readable forms such as SBML in a straightforward way. It is supported by CellDesigner, a diagrammatic network editing software (http://www.celldesigner.org/), and has been used to represent a variety of networks of various sizes (from only a few components to several hundred components).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt1111

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathway Tools software and CellDesigner pathway editor are developing support for BioPAX-based data exchange.

    “The Pathway Tools software21 and CellDesigner pathway editor54 are developing support for BioPAX-based data exchange.”

    From The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing (2010) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitano, H., Funahashi, A., Matsuoka, Y., & Oda, K.
Affiliations
  • Systems Biology Institute (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitano, Hiroaki
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2005-08
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
961-966
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2045478141
Cited by
483
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 23
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
process diagrams, state diagrams, SBML, CellDesigner, protein-protein interaction network, gene regulatory networks, diagrammatic notation
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Transcription Factors, User-Computer Interface, Signal Transduction, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review