The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
Self-citation
Cited by
Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen
Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T.-W., Chokhawala, H., Schroth, G., Luo, S., Clark, D. S., Chen, F., Zhang, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200387 · Cited by 1,319
Albertsen, M., Hugenholtz, P., Skarshewski, A., Nielsen, K. L., Tyson, G. W., & Nielsen, P. H. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2579 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citationMatsen, F. A., Kodner, R. B., & Armbrust, E. V. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 · Cited by 1,050
Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics
Orsi, R. H., Bakker, H. C. D., & Wiedmann, M. (2011) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.05.002 · Cited by 732
Metagenomic Analyses: Past and Future Trends
Simon, C., & Daniel, R. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02345-10 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Martín, H. G., Ivanova, N., Kunin, V., Warnecke, F., Barry, K. W., McHardy, A. C., Yeates, C., He, S., Salamov, A. A., Szeto, E., Dalin, E., Putnam, N. H., Shapiro, H. J., Pangilinan, J. L., Rigoutsos, I., Kyrpides, N. C., Blackall, L. L., McMahon, K. D., & Hugenholtz, P.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2006-09-24
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1263-1269
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2001620437
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt1247
- The paper
- Martín, H. G., Ivanova, N., Kunin, V., Warnecke, F., Barry, K. W., McHardy, A. C., Yeates, C., He, S., Salamov, A. A., Szeto, E., Dalin, E., Putnam, N. H., Shapiro, H. J., Pangilinan, J. L., Rigoutsos, I., Kyrpides, N. C., Blackall, L. L., McMahon, K. D., & Hugenholtz, P. (2006). Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
