Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metagenomic Analyses: Past and Future Trends

Open access
Simon, Carola, Daniel, Rolf·2011·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Metagenomics has revolutionized microbiology by paving the way for a cultivation-independent assessment and exploitation of microbial communities present in complex ecosystems. Metagenomics comprising construction and screening of metagenomic DNA libraries has proven to be a powerful tool to isolate new enzymes and drugs of industrial importance. So far, the majority of the metagenomically exploited habitats comprised temperate environments, such as soil and marine environments. Recently, metagenomes of extreme environments have also been used as sources of novel biocatalysts. The employment of next-generation sequencing techniques for metagenomics resulted in the generation of large sequence data sets derived from various environments, such as soil, the human body, and ocean water. Analyses of these data sets opened a window into the enormous taxonomic and functional diversity of environmental microbial communities. To assess the functional dynamics of microbial communities, metatranscriptomics and metaproteomics have been developed. The combination of DNA-based, mRNA-based, and protein-based analyses of microbial communities present in different environments is a way to elucidate the compositions, functions, and interactions of microbial communities and to link these to environmental processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.02345-10

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 143 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.01.003 · doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2008.01.003
  2. 10.1128/AEM.00902-10 · doi:10.1128/aem.00902-10
  3. 10.1007/s11103-009-9558-y · doi:10.1007/s11103-009-9558-y
  4. Cieśliński, H., et al. 2009. Identification and molecular modeling of a novel lipase from an Antarctic soil metagenomic library. Pol. J. Microbiol. 58:199-204.
  5. 10.1128/AEM.02597-08 · doi:10.1128/aem.02597-08
  6. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-12 · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-12
  7. 10.1038/ismej.2009.104 · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.104
  8. 10.1007/s00253-009-2361-5 · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2361-5
  9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.091 · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.091
  10. 10.1007/s00253-009-1992-x · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-1992-x
  11. 10.2166/wst.2008.620 · doi:10.2166/wst.2008.620
  12. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01162.x · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01162.x
  13. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01967.x · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01967.x
  14. 10.1126/science. 1109070 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.4014/jmb.0812.695 · doi:10.4014/jmb.0812.695

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Simon, C., & Daniel, R.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2011-02-15
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
1153-1161
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2171309014
Cited by
731
References
143
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomic Analyses: Past and Future Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02345-10
The paper
Simon, C., & Daniel, R. (2011). Metagenomic Analyses: Past and Future Trends. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02345-10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.