Cited by 630Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The HUPO PSI's Molecular Interaction format—a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data

Hermjakob, Henning, Montecchi-Palazzi, Luisa, Bader, Gary, Wojcik, Jérôme, Salwinski, Lukasz, Ceol, Arnaud, Moore, Susan, Orchard, Sandra +31 more·2004·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

A major goal of proteomics is the complete description of the protein interaction network underlying cell physiology. A large number of small scale and, more recently, large-scale experiments have contributed to expanding our understanding of the nature of the interaction network. However, the necessary data integration across experiments is currently hampered by the fragmentation of publicly available protein interaction data, which exists in different formats in databases, on authors' websites or sometimes only in print publications. Here, we propose a community standard data model for the representation and exchange of protein interaction data. This data model has been jointly developed by members of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI), a work group of the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO), and is supported by major protein interaction data providers, in particular the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND), Cellzome (Heidelberg, Germany), the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP), Dana Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA, USA), the Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD), Hybrigenics (Paris, France), the European Bioinformatics Institute's (EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK) IntAct, the Molecular Interactions (MINT, Rome, Italy) database, the Protein-Protein Interaction Database (PPID, Edinburgh, UK) and the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt926

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detailed information about experimental evidence supporting a pathway map is only included in BioPAX for molecular interactions because it was already defined by PSI-MI and reused.

    “This information is only included in BioPAX for molecular interactions, because that was already defined by the Proteomics Standards Initiative Molecular Interactions (PSI-MI) language58 and it was reused.”

    From The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing (2010) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hermjakob, H., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Bader, G., Wojcik, J., Salwinski, L., Ceol, A., Moore, S., Orchard, S., Sarkans, U., von Mering, C., Roechert, B., Poux, S., Jung, E., Mersch, H., Kersey, P., Lappe, M., Li, Y., Zeng, R., Rana, D., Nikolski, M., Husi, H., Brun, C., Shanker, K., Grant, S. G. N., Sander, C., Bork, P., Zhu, W., Pandey, A., Brazma, A., Jacq, B., Vidal, M., Sherman, D., Legrain, P., Cesareni, G., Xenarios, I., Eisenberg, D., Steipe, B., Hogue, C., & Apweiler, R.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Hybrigenics (France) (FR)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (CA)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hermjakob, Henning
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2004-01-30
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
177-183
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2006933206
Cited by
630
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 32
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, data exchange standards, Proteomics Standards Initiative, interaction networks, data integration, interaction databases
MeSH terms
Database Management Systems, Natural Language Processing, Protein Binding, Proteins, Reference Standards, Software, User-Computer Interface, Information Storage and Retrieval, Guidelines as Topic, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein, Internationality, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review