Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rab10 joins the ER social network

Chang, Jaerak, Blackstone, Craig·2013·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a heterogeneous organelle with distinct morphologies of sheets and an interconnected network of tubules sharing a common lumen. An ER domain marked by the Rab10 GTPase and several lipid-synthesizing enzymes is implicated in dynamic ER tubule formation and fusion events in cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncb2682

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Lin, S., Sun, S. & Hu, J. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 44, 1436–1443 (2012). · DOI
  2. Hu, J. et al. Cell 138, 549–561 (2009). · DOI
  3. Orso, G. et al. Nature 460, 978–983 (2009). · DOI
  4. Chen, S. Novick, P. & Ferro-Novick, S. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 707–716 (2012). · DOI
  5. English, A. R. & Voeltz, G. K. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 169–178 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kim, Y. J., Guzman-Hernandez, M. L. Balla, T. Dev. Cell 21, 813–824 (2011). · DOI
  7. Turner, M. D., Plutner, H. & Balch, W. E. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13479–13483 (1997). · DOI
  8. Sandoval, C. O. & Simmen, T. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 1426–1432 (2012). · DOI
  9. Chen, Y. et al. J. Cell Biol. 198, 545–560 (2012). · DOI
  10. Sasidharan, N. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18944–18949 (2012). · DOI
  11. Audhya, A., Desai, A. & Oemega, K. J. Cell Biol. 178, 43–56 (2007). · DOI
  12. Shi, A. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2306–E2315 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Wagner, W., Brenowitz, S. D. & Hammer, J. A. III Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 40–50 (2011). · DOI
  14. Yoshimura, S., Gerondopoulos, A., Linford, A. Rigden, D. J. & Barr, F. A. J. Cell Biol. 191, 367–381 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wang, T. et al. Dev. Cell 21, 431–444 (2011). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chang, J., & Blackstone, C.
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2013-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
135-136
ISSN
  • 1465-7392
  • 1476-4679
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.