Cited by 115melanin and skin pigmentationZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Proliferation, dispersal and patterned aggregation of iridophores in the skin prefigure striped colouration of zebrafish

Singh, Ajeet Pratap, Schach, Ursula, Nüsslein-Volhard, Christiane·2014·Nature Cell Biology

Abstract

Colour patterns are a striking feature of animals; they evolve rapidly and play an important role in natural as well as sexual selection. It has been proposed that colour pattern formation in adult vertebrates depends on Turing-type interactions between pigment cells; however, little is known about the actual developmental mechanisms underlying the complex and prolonged ontogeny of this important adult feature. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) owe their name to a repetitive pattern of dark stripes and light interstripes parallel to the anteroposterior body axis that develop during juvenile stages. By inducible Cre/loxP-mediated recombination in neural-crest-derived progenitors, we created labelled clones of skin pigment cells that were imaged over several weeks in juvenile and adult fish. Metamorphic iridophores arise from postembryonic stem cells located at the dorsal root ganglia of the peripheral nervous system. They emerge in the skin at the horizontal myoseptum to form the first interstripe and proliferate while spreading bidirectionally along the dorsoventral axis. Patterned aggregation of iridophores during their dispersal generates a series of interstripes that define the stripe regions. Melanophore progenitors appear in situ in the presumptive stripe region where they melanize and expand in size to form compact stripes. Thus, although depending on mutual interactions between different pigment cells, stripes and interstripes are formed by a completely different cellular route.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncb2955

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few of these cells that transitioned from a nascent dense morphology to a loose morphology occurred already within prospective stripe regions.

    “Contrary to the expectations of the morphogenetic respecification model12,20, the few of these cells that transitioned from a nascent dense morphology to a loose morphology occurred already within prospective stripe regions.”
  • In dark stripes, iridophores are sparse in number and stellate in shape, sometimes referred to as having a loose morphology.

    “In the dark stripes, by contrast, iridophores are sparse in number and stellate in shape, and are sometimes referred to as having a “loose” morphology12 (Fig. 1b).”
  • This suggests differentiation with subsequent proliferation rather than active aggregation of widely dispersed cells.

    “In addition, we found that the formation of secondary interstripes was characterized by the development of cells newly expressing pnp4a within this region, suggesting differentiation with subsequent proliferation rather than active aggregation of widely dispersed cells12 (Supplementary Fig. 3).”
  • Previous analyses used a sox10:CreERt2 transgene that can mark most or all postembryonic neural crest derivatives, including multipotent progenitors in the peripheral nervous system, and cells transiting from the peripheral nervous system to the hypodermis of the skin.

    “Previous analyses used a sox10:CreERt2 transgene that can mark most or all postembryonic neural crest derivatives, including multipotent progenitors in the peripheral nervous system, and cells transiting from the peripheral nervous system to the hypodermis of the skin12,46”
  • Such behaviors occurred within prospective stripes, rather than at boundaries between interstripes and stripes, and involved cells that had not yet fully differentiated.

    “Such behaviors occurred within prospective stripes, rather than at boundaries between interstripes and stripes, as previously postulated5,12, and involved cells that had not yet fully differentiated”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, A. P., Schach, U., & Nüsslein-Volhard, C.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology (DE)
Corresponding author
Singh, Ajeet Pratap
Venue
Nature Cell Biology
Published
2014-04-28
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
604-611
ISSN
  • 1465-7392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4679
OpenAlex
W2080513987
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
iridophores, melanophores, dorsal root ganglia, cell dispersal
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Cell Movement, Chromatophores, Melanophores, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Stem Cells, Zebrafish, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Zebrafish Proteins, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review