Taking Ockham's razor to enzyme dynamics and catalysis
Abstract
The role of protein dynamics in enzyme catalysis is a matter of intense current debate. Enzyme-catalysed reactions that involve significant quantum tunnelling can give rise to experimental kinetic isotope effects with complex temperature dependences, and it has been suggested that standard statistical rate theories, such as transition-state theory, are inadequate for their explanation. Here we introduce aspects of transition-state theory relevant to the study of enzyme reactivity, taking cues from chemical kinetics and dynamics studies of small molecules in the gas phase and in solution--where breakdowns of statistical theories have received significant attention and their origins are relatively better understood. We discuss recent theoretical approaches to understanding enzyme activity and then show how experimental observations for a number of enzymes may be reproduced using a transition-state-theory framework with physically reasonable parameters. Essential to this simple model is the inclusion of multiple conformations with different reactivity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standard models for describing quantum tunnelling have been shown to explain experimental enzyme data, so long as one accounts for the fact that enzymes have many possible different structures.
“Standard models for describing quantum tunnelling have been shown to explain experimental enzyme data, so long as one accounts for the fact that enzymes have many possible different structures [88].”
From The future of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 232
- Authors
- Glowacki, D. R., Harvey, J. N., & Mulholland, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Glowacki, David R.
- Mulholland, Adrian J.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2012-01-29
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-176
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W1984276856
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G00224X/1, EP/G042853/1, EP/E022197/1, EP/G002843/1, EP/J010588/1, GR/R86119/01, EP/I030395/1, EP/G007705/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- enzyme catalysis, enzyme dynamics, quantum tunneling, kinetic isotope effects, temperature dependence, transition state theory, multi-state models, protein conformational dynamics, enzyme reactivity
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Enzymes, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review