Cited by 232Protein Structure and DynamicsChemical Reaction MechanismsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

Taking Ockham's razor to enzyme dynamics and catalysis

Glowacki, David R., Harvey, Jeremy N., Mulholland, Adrian J.·2012·Nature Chemistry

Abstract

The role of protein dynamics in enzyme catalysis is a matter of intense current debate. Enzyme-catalysed reactions that involve significant quantum tunnelling can give rise to experimental kinetic isotope effects with complex temperature dependences, and it has been suggested that standard statistical rate theories, such as transition-state theory, are inadequate for their explanation. Here we introduce aspects of transition-state theory relevant to the study of enzyme reactivity, taking cues from chemical kinetics and dynamics studies of small molecules in the gas phase and in solution--where breakdowns of statistical theories have received significant attention and their origins are relatively better understood. We discuss recent theoretical approaches to understanding enzyme activity and then show how experimental observations for a number of enzymes may be reproduced using a transition-state-theory framework with physically reasonable parameters. Essential to this simple model is the inclusion of multiple conformations with different reactivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchem.1244

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard models for describing quantum tunnelling have been shown to explain experimental enzyme data, so long as one accounts for the fact that enzymes have many possible different structures.

    “Standard models for describing quantum tunnelling have been shown to explain experimental enzyme data, so long as one accounts for the fact that enzymes have many possible different structures [88].”

    From The future of quantum biology (2018) · cites this paper as [88]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 232

Authors
Glowacki, D. R., Harvey, J. N., & Mulholland, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Glowacki, David R.
  • Mulholland, Adrian J.
Venue
Nature Chemistry
Published
2012-01-29
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
169-176
ISSN
  • 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4349
OpenAlex
W1984276856
Cited by
232
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 24
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G00224X/1, EP/G042853/1, EP/E022197/1, EP/G002843/1, EP/J010588/1, GR/R86119/01, EP/I030395/1, EP/G007705/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
enzyme catalysis, enzyme dynamics, quantum tunneling, kinetic isotope effects, temperature dependence, transition state theory, multi-state models, protein conformational dynamics, enzyme reactivity
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Enzymes, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review