Cited by 254Liver physiology and pathologyPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Identification of small molecules for human hepatocyte expansion and iPS differentiation

Open access
Shan, Jing, Schwartz, Robert E, Ross, Nathan T, Logan, David J, Thomas, David, Duncan, Stephen A, North, Trista E, Goessling, Wolfram +2 more·2013·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

Cell-based therapies hold the potential to alleviate the growing burden of liver diseases. Such therapies require human hepatocytes, which, within the stromal context of the liver, are capable of many rounds of replication. However, this ability is lost ex vivo, and human hepatocyte sourcing has limited many fields of research for decades. Here we developed a high-throughput screening platform for primary human hepatocytes to identify small molecules in two different classes that can be used to generate renewable sources of functional human hepatocytes. The first class induced functional proliferation of primary human hepatocytes in vitro. The second class enhanced hepatocyte functions and promoted the differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes toward a more mature phenotype than what was previously obtainable. The identification of these small molecules can help address a major challenge affecting many facets of liver research and may lead to the development of new therapeutics for liver diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.1270

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient-specific hepatocytes derived from autologous iPSCs have recently emerged as an attractive alternative that can overcome issues with primary hepatocytes.

    “Patient-specific hepatocytes derived from autologous iPSCs have recently emerged as an attractive alternative that can overcome these issues [60].”

    From A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids (2016) · cites this paper as [60]

    The paper describes stem cells as an attractive alternative to primary hepatocytes and says iPS cells offer the possibility of patient-specific hepatocyte-like cells (opening passage, page unavailable). It does not establish that these cells overcome the issues with primary hepatocytes: the same passage says their immature phenotype and limited function restrict their use as a renewable source of functional hepatocytes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High-throughput screening identified small molecules that supported HHs for one week with about 10-fold expansion.

    “Another study using high-throughput screening identified small molecules that supported HHs for one week with about 10-fold expansion (Shan et al., 2013”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 254

Authors
Shan, J., Schwartz, R. E., Ross, N. T., Logan, D. J., Thomas, D., Duncan, S. A., North, T. E., Goessling, W., Carpenter, A. E., & Bhatia, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bhatia, Sangeeta N
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2013-06-02
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
514-520
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W1534392087
Cited by
254
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8
FWCI
19.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PMC
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL094857, R01HL094857)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG006398, HG006398)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA014051)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM089652, R01 GM0896)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R03DK085445, R01 DK56966, R01DK090311, R01DK085713, DK 55743, DK085445, R01DK056966, R01DK055743, DK087377, R01DK098241, RC1DK087377, R01DK065152)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
human hepatocytes, hepatocyte expansion, induced pluripotent stem cells, hepatocyte differentiation, small molecules, high-throughput compound screening, machine learning, hepatocyte proliferation, hepatocyte maturation, cell therapy, liver disease
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Molecular Structure, Hepatocytes, Cell Proliferation, Small Molecule Libraries, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review