A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids
Open accessAbstract
The inadequacy of animal models in correctly predicting drug and biothreat agent toxicity in humans has resulted in a pressing need for in vitro models that can recreate the in vivo scenario. One of the most important organs in the assessment of drug toxicity is liver. Here, we report the development of a liver-on-a-chip platform for long-term culture of three-dimensional (3D) human HepG2/C3A spheroids for drug toxicity assessment. The bioreactor design allowed for in situ monitoring of the culture environment by enabling direct access to the hepatic construct during the experiment without compromising the platform operation. The engineered bioreactor could be interfaced with a bioprinter to fabricate 3D hepatic constructs of spheroids encapsulated within photocrosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel. The engineered hepatic construct remained functional during the 30 days culture period as assessed by monitoring the secretion rates of albumin, alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin, and ceruloplasmin, as well as immunostaining for the hepatocyte markers, cytokeratin 18, MRP2 bile canalicular protein and tight junction protein ZO-1. Treatment with 15 mM acetaminophen induced a toxic response in the hepatic construct that was similar to published studies on animal and other in vitro models, thus providing a proof-of-concept demonstration of the utility of this liver-on-a-chip platform for toxicity assessment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
16 of 40 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Conventional 2D hepatic mono- and co-cultures of normal and diseased human cells fail to mimic the complex 3D in vivo microenvironment and extracellular matrix support.
“However, hepatic models that utilize conventional 2D mono-and co-cultures of normal and diseased human cells fail to mimic the complex threedimensional (3D) in vivo microenvironment and extracellular matrix (ECM) support [16,19,20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Khetani, 2008, Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- cites [19] Bhatia, 1999, Effect of cell–cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells, FASEB J. source
- cites [20] LeCluyse, 2012, Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing, Crit. Rev. Toxicol. source
Section 3.3 says traditional 2D monocultures and co-cultures do not typically represent the liver’s three-dimensional cellular configuration or in vivo microenvironments. But Section 2.1 says co-cultures satisfy nearly all biophysical requirements for hepatocytes, including cell–matrix contacts, so the blanket claim that they lack ECM support overstates the source. The cited passages also do not establish the claim specifically for diseased human cells; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Increased albumin secretion from spheroids compared to cell monolayers is consistent with observations reported in literature.
“Increased albumin secretion from spheroids compared to cell monolayers, as seen here, is consistent with observations reported in literature, which indicates that culturing the cells as spheroids may enhance homotypic cell-cell interactions within aggregated hepatocytes and improve functional outcomes of the hepatic construct [25,48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Li, 2014, Micropatterned cell–cell interactions enable functional encapsulation of primary hepatocytes in hydrogel microtissues, Tissue Eng. A source
The “Effect of homotypic contacts on 3D albumin secretion” section reports more than threefold greater albumin secretion from hydrogels containing aggregated hepatocyte pucks than from hydrogels containing unpatterned hepatocytes at day 8. This supports the proposed benefit of aggregation, but the measured comparison was between two 3D hydrogel conditions, not spheroids and cell monolayers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [48] Fraczek, 2013, Primary hepatocyte cultures for pharmaco-toxicological studies: at the busy crossroad of various anti-dedifferentiation strategies, Arch. Toxicol. source
- Premisecitation
These cell lines offer a reliable alternative to primary cells by overcoming the above issues, especially for use in proof-of-concept studies in dynamic flow liver-on-a-chip platforms.
“These cell lines offer a reliable alternative to primary cells by overcoming the above issues, especially for use in proof-of-concept studies in dynamic flow liver-on-achip platforms [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] LeCluyse, 2012, Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing, Crit. Rev. Toxicol. source
- Rests on an assumption: Primary hepatocytes have limited lifespan, difficulty in obtaining the cell source, and large batch-to-batch variability post-isolation.
- Interpretationcitation
By adapting this method, the authors avoided potentially harsh printing conditions including low temperature for a prolonged printing period and undesirable shear stress along the length of the nozzle.
“By adapting this method, we avoided potentially harsh printing conditions including, low temperature for a prolonged printing period [51] and undesirable shear stress along the length of the nozzle [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [51] Billiet, 2014, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability, Biomaterials source
- cites [30] Bertassoni, 2014, Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels, Biofabrication source
Section 3.3 reports that cell viability was not significantly affected and suggests the hydrogel matrix may protect cells from shear stress during dispensing. It also says dispensing required significant stress, so the source supports protection from its effects, not avoidance of shear stress along the nozzle. The low-temperature condition is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The oxygen consumption of HepG2/C3A cells can be described with Michaelis-Menten kinetics.
“The oxygen consumption of HepG2/C3A cells can be described with the Michaelis-Menten kinetics [41,42]:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Weise, 2013, Analysis and comparison of oxygen consumption of HepG2 cells in a monolayer and three-dimensional high density cell culture by use of a matrigrid®, Biotechnol. Bioeng. source
- cites [42] Buchwald, 2009, FEM-based oxygen consumption and cell viability models for avascular pancreatic islets, Theor. Biol. Med. Modelling source
The Methods section assumes a Michaelis–Menten-type rate for oxygen consumption, and the Discussion’s “Oxygen consumption model” section specifies that this assumption applies to pancreatic islet tissue. The cited paper does not establish that the same kinetics describe HepG2/C3A cells; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Commercial cell lines including HepG2/C3A provide a more stable, easy-to-handle and readily available source of human cells for in vitro studies on liver function and general mechanisms of toxicity.
“Commercial cell lines including HepG2/C3A provide a more stable, easy-to-handle and readily available source of human cells for in vitro studies on liver function and general mechanisms of toxicity [58,59].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] Jennen, 2010, Comparison of HepG2 and HepaRG by whole-genome gene expression analysis for the purpose of chemical hazard identification, Toxicol. Sci. source
The paper’s Abstract describes HepG2 as easy to handle compared with primary human hepatocytes and as a frequently used model for toxicogenomics studies. It does not establish that these cell lines are more stable or readily available, and it does not address HepG2/C3A specifically. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [59] Wilkening, 2003, Comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line Hepg2 with regard to their biotransformation properties, Drug Metab. Dispos. source
- Findingown data
At day 30, the minimum oxygen concentration dropped to an average of 38% (minimum 19%) of the inlet value.
“This value dropped to an average of 38% (minimum 19%) at day 30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogels can be modeled as a porous medium with a uniform volumetric oxygen consumption rate associated with the total number of encapsulated cells.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The oxygen concentration at the inlet is constant and uniform.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All boundaries of the bioreactor can be treated as impermeable surfaces for oxygen transport.
- Findingown data
A batch of 10,000 spheroids was obtained per mold.
“A batch of 10 000 spheroids was obtained per mold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The fabricated bioreactor was interfaced with a bioprinter to fabricate 3D hepatic constructs of spheroids encapsulated within GelMA hydrogel.
“The engineered bioreactor could be interfaced with a bioprinter to fabricate 3D hepatic constructs of spheroids encapsulated within photocrosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel.”
- Also stated in: § Bioreactor platform overview · plain
“The fabricated bioreactor shown in figure 1(c) was interfaced with a bioprinter to incorporate 3D cell-laden hydrogel constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Bioreactor platform overview · plain
- Findingown data
Cell viability in spheroids harvested after 5 days of microwell culture was confirmed using Live/Dead staining.
“We confirmed the cell viability in the spheroids harvested after 5 days of microwell culture using Live/Dead staining.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Z-stack confocal microscope image of the stained spheroid showed viable cells in the core of the spheroid.
“The Z-stack confocal microscope image of the stained spheroid showed viable cells (green, Calcien AM) in the core of the spheroid (figure 2(c)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The bioreactor design allowed in situ monitoring of the culture environment by enabling direct access to the hepatic construct during the experiment without compromising platform operation.
“The bioreactor design allowed for in situ monitoring of the culture environment by enabling direct access to the hepatic construct during the experiment without compromising the platform operation.”
- Also stated in: § Bioreactor platform overview · plain
“Moreover, the resealability of the design allowed direct access to the cells during the experiment for biological analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Bioreactor platform overview · plain
- Findingown data
Treatment with 15 mM acetaminophen induced a toxic response in the hepatic construct that was similar to published studies on animal and other in vitro models.
“Treatment with 15 mM acetaminophen induced a toxic response in the hepatic construct that was similar to published studies on animal and other in vitro models, thus providing a proof-of-concept demonstration of the utility of this liver-on-a-chip platform for toxicity assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The engineered hepatic construct remained functional during the 30 days culture period as assessed by secretion rates of albumin, alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin, and ceruloplasmin, and by immunostaining for cytokeratin 18, MRP2, and ZO-1.
“The engineered hepatic construct remained functional during the 30 days culture period as assessed by monitoring the secretion rates of albumin, alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin, and ceruloplasmin, as well as immunostaining for the hepatocyte markers, cytokeratin 18, MRP2 bile canalicular protein and tight junction protein ZO-1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The minimum oxygen concentration at any point within the chamber was 91% of the inlet value at day 1 for a flow rate of 200 μL h−1.
“we found that the minimum c O 2 at any point within the chamber was 91% of the inlet value at day 1 for a flow rate of 200 μL h -1 (figure 1(d)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The hydrogels can be modeled as a porous medium with a uniform volumetric oxygen consumption rate associated with the total number of encapsulated cells.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The oxygen concentration at the inlet is constant and uniform.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All boundaries of the bioreactor can be treated as impermeable surfaces for oxygen transport.
- Findingown data
Immunostaining at day 6 showed that MRP2 expression in APAP-treated cultures decreased.
“Immunostaining data of nontreated and APAP treated cultures (figure 4(b)) at day 6 shows that the expression of MRP2 in drug treated cultures decreased”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The developed liver-on-a-chip platform enabled bioprinting of hepatocyte spheroid-laden hydrogel constructs directly within the culture chamber of a bioreactor.
“Here, we developed a liver-on-a-chip platform that enabled bioprinting of hepatocyte spheroid-laden hydrogel constructs directly within the culture chamber of a bioreactor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The bioreactor could be easily disassembled to access the cells for biological assessment during the long-term culture period.
“The bioreactor could be easily disassembled to access the cells for biological assessment during the long-term culture period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Cultured spheroids remained viable and active during the 30 days of culture period.
“Cultured spheroids remained viable and active during the 30 days of culture period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The bioreactor culture environment was able to sustain biomarker production over 30 days.
“The bioreactor culture environment was able to sustain the biomarker production over the course of 30 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The variations in biomarker production over the 30-day culture were not statistically significant.
“However, the variations were not statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The production rates of albumin, A1AT, transferrin, and ceruloplasmin significantly decreased over time for APAP-treated cultures compared to no-drug control cultures.
“The production rate of the four biomarkers, albumin (figure 4(c)), A1AT (figure 4(d)), transferrin (figure 4(e)), and ceruloplasmin (figure 4(f)), also significantly decreased over time for the APAP treated cultures as compared to no drug control cultures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DAPI staining showed decreased nuclei density within the treated constructs.
“The DAPI staining showed the decreased nuclei density within the treated constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The expression of hepatic proteins (cytokeratin 18, ZO1, MRP2) was sustained for 30 days of culture.
“the expression of these hepatic proteins was sustained for 30 days of culture”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The oxygen tension in the core of spheroids contrasts with that in the periphery, better mimicking the in vivo oxygen gradient in the hepatic lobule.
“The oxygen tension in the core of the spheroids contrasts with that in the periphery, better mimicking the in vivo oxygen gradient in the hepatic lobule [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Haussinger, 1988, Hepatic sublobular synthesis of urea: control by oxygen or by pH gradient?, Hepatology source
- Interpretationnone given
The spheroid size could be easily adjusted by tuning the microwell size.
“The spheroid size could be easily adjusted by tuning the microwell size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using cell spheroids instead of dispersed cells might improve cellular functionality and response for drug toxicity assessment.
“As a result, the use of cell spheroids instead of disperse cells might improve the cellular functionality and response for drug toxicity assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Static cultures traditionally used for drug testing lack the physiological cues important for drug metabolism.
“Static cultures that are traditionally used for drug testing lack the physiological cues important for drug metabolism, which has been highlighted in multiple reports [13][14][15]26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13][14][15]26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The liver-on-a-chip platform provides a proof-of-concept demonstration of utility for toxicity assessment.
“Treatment with 15 mM acetaminophen induced a toxic response in the hepatic construct that was similar to published studies on animal and other in vitro models, thus providing a proof-of-concept demonstration of the utility of this liver-on-a-chip platform for toxicity assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The sustained expression of hepatic proteins indicates bioactivity of hepatocytes during long-term bioreactor culture.
“indicating the bioactivity of hepatocytes during the long term bioreactor culture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A grid size of 800,000 nodes provides grid-independent results.
“The grid independence of the results was checked and we noticed that a grid size of 800 000 nodes provides grid independent results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The decrease in biomarker production may be attributed to decreasing oxygen availability within the spheroid core over time as spheroid size increased with cell proliferation, without any change in media perfusion rate.
“The decrease in production maybe attributed to the decreasing oxygen availability within the spheroid core overtime as the spheroid size increased with cell proliferation (figure S3), without any change in the media perfusion rate (200 μL h -1 ) over the 30 days culture period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The decrease in MRP2 expression was a result of loss of normal cellular activity within the spheroids.
“as a result of loss of normal cellular activity within the spheroids.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These results suggest the promise of the developed liver-on-a-chip platform for evaluating acute drug toxicity as a complementary tool during the preclinical animal phase of drug development.
“These results suggest the promise of the developed liver-on-a-chip platform for evaluating acute drug toxicity as a complementary tool during the preclinical animal phase of drug development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The bioreactor responds to the acute toxic drug dose.
“thus showing that the bioreactor responds to the acute toxic drug dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Liver-specific functions of primary hepatocytes relevant for drug development and toxicity studies are rapidly downregulated during in vitro culture.
“However, liverspecific functions of primary hepatocytes relevant for drug development and toxicity studies are rapidly downregulated during their in vitro cultures [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Gomez-Lechon, 2003, Human hepatocytes as a tool for studying toxicity and drug metabolism, Curr. Drug Metab. source
- May combine two claims. 17
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationiPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells are still in nascent stages of development and show characteristics similar to fetal hepatocytes.
“These iPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells are still in nascent stages of development and show characteristics similar to fetal hepatocytes [76].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Bhatia, 2014, Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease, Sci. Translational Med. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPatient-specific hepatocytes derived from autologous iPSCs have recently emerged as an attractive alternative that can overcome issues with primary hepatocytes.
“Patient-specific hepatocytes derived from autologous iPSCs have recently emerged as an attractive alternative that can overcome these issues [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Shan, 2013, Identification of small molecules for human hepatocyte expansion and iPS differentiation, Nat. Chem. Biol. source
The paper describes stem cells as an attractive alternative to primary hepatocytes and says iPS cells offer the possibility of patient-specific hepatocyte-like cells (opening passage, page unavailable). It does not establish that these cells overcome the issues with primary hepatocytes: the same passage says their immature phenotype and limited function restrict their use as a renewable source of functional hepatocytes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe metabolic activity and function of cells fluctuate over time, and similar observations have been reported in the literature.
“The metabolic activity and function of cells fluctuate over time and similar observations have been reported in the literature [61,62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] Dash, 2013, Hemodynamic flow improves rat hepatocyte morphology, function, and metabolic activity in vitro, Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. source
The Abstract reports that hepatocyte-specific function and metabolic enzyme activity decline over days in nonflow cultures. The Discussion (Fig. 7A) likewise describes a decline in enzyme expression and activity over 3–7 days, but says the controlled-hemodynamics system maintains stability. The source supports time-dependent changes in cultured hepatocytes, not a general claim that cells’ activity and function fluctuate over time. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] Wagner, 2013, A dynamic multi-organ-chip for long-term cultivation and substance testing proven by 3D human liver and skin tissue co-culture, Lab Chip source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAPAP overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US.
“APAP overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US [71,72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Blazer, 2009, Nonprescription use of pain relievers by middle-aged and elderly community-living adults: national survey on drug use and health, J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. source
The Abstract Results report that acetaminophen-containing pain relievers were commonly used without a prescription in the surveyed group, but do not discuss overdose or liver failure. Searches of the full-text copy for acetaminophen overdose and liver failure found no passage addressing whether overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [72] Davidson, 1966, Acute liver necrosis following overdose of paracetamol, Br. Med. J. source
The Summary (page unavailable) describes two fatal cases of acute liver necrosis after paracetamol overdose and suggests paracetamol was the chief cause. The paper does not establish that overdose is a common cause of acute liver failure in the US; it provides no US frequency data. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAPAP is a well-characterized hepatotoxic drug and its in vivo model data is available in literature.
“APAP is a wellcharacterized hepatotoxic drug and its in vivo model data is available in literature [73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Fey, 2012, Determination of drug toxicity using 3D spheroids constructed from an immortal human hepatocyte cell line, Toxicol. Sci. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCulturing cells as spheroids may enhance homotypic cell-cell interactions within aggregated hepatocytes and improve functional outcomes of the hepatic construct.
“Increased albumin secretion from spheroids compared to cell monolayers, as seen here, is consistent with observations reported in literature, which indicates that culturing the cells as spheroids may enhance homotypic cell-cell interactions within aggregated hepatocytes and improve functional outcomes of the hepatic construct [25,48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Li, 2014, Micropatterned cell–cell interactions enable functional encapsulation of primary hepatocytes in hydrogel microtissues, Tissue Eng. A source
- cites [48] Fraczek, 2013, Primary hepatocyte cultures for pharmaco-toxicological studies: at the busy crossroad of various anti-dedifferentiation strategies, Arch. Toxicol. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHepG2 cells can cluster over time, but dispersed cells take longer to form cell-cell interactions when encapsulated in a porous scaffold compared to spheroids, which could affect their resistance to drugs.
“HepG2 cells can cluster over time, but dispersed cells take longer to form these cell-cell interactions when encapsulated in a porous scaffold compared to spheroids, which could affect their resistance to drugs [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Ho, 2010, Incorporation of multicellular spheroids into 3D polymeric scaffolds provides an improved tumor model for screening anticancer drugs, Cancer Sci. source
The section ‘Spheroids remain intact in scaffolds after seeding’ (page unavailable) compares dispersed cells with spheroids in porous scaffolds and reports greater drug resistance for the spheroid-seeded scaffolds. However, the experiments used U251 glioma cells, not HepG2 cells, and the copy does not establish that dispersed cells take longer than spheroids to form cell-cell interactions in scaffolds. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe observed cell density range is typical for hydrogel encapsulation.
“which is a typical cell density range for hydrogel encapsulation [7]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Akbari, 2014, Composite living fibers for creating tissue constructs using textile techniques, Adv. Funct. Mater. source
The Experimental Section (Preparation of Cell Suspension in Sodium Alginate; page unavailable) reports using 2–5 × 10^6 cells mL−1 in an alginate suspension for cell-laden hydrogel fibers. This supports the range as an example of hydrogel encapsulation, but the paper does not establish that it is typical across hydrogel encapsulation generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe thickness of the bioprinted GelMA dot is approximately 800 μm, which is thicker than the average diameter of the spheroids (approximately 200 μm).
“As seen in the side view micrograph of the bioprinted hydrogel with spheroids in figure S2, the thickness of the bioprinted GelMA dot is ∼800 μm, which is thicker than the average diameter of the spheroids (∼200 μm).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe bioreactor could be unscrewed for disassembly at any time for direct access to the hepatic construct and then resealed, unlike the majority of PDMS-based on-chip systems that are permanently plasma bonded.
“Unlike the majority of PDMSbased on-chip systems, which are permanently plasma bonded to seal the compartments, the bioreactor could be unscrewed for disassembly at any time for allowing direct access to the hepatic construct and then resealed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe dimensions of the bioprinted hydrogel features were much smaller than the 8 mm depth of the chamber.
“Moreover, the dimensions of the bioprinted hydrogel features were much smaller than the 8 mm depth of the chamber.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA spheroid size of 200 μm is suitable to avoid necrosis in the core while maintaining the functionality of the cells within the spheroids.
“Literature suggests that a size of 200 μm is suitable to avoid necrosis in the core, while maintaining the functionality of the cells within the spheroids [46,47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe current drug development process suffers from a high failure rate during clinical trials, partly due to inadequacy of animal models to accurately predict toxic side-effects of drugs in humans.
“The current drug development process suffers from a high failure rate during clinical trials, which is partly due to inadequacy of animal models to accurately predict the toxic side-effects of drugs in humans [1,2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEx vivo studies using 3D tissue biopsies or slices may be difficult for high-throughput studies and show rapid loss of functionality within a few days in vitro, limiting their application for long-term studies.
“Ex vivo studies using 3D tissue biopsies or slices have been reported, but they may be difficult to be used for high-throughput studies and show rapid loss of functionality within a few days in vitro, thus limiting their application for long-term studies [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] van Midwoud, 2010, A microfluidic approach for in vitro assessment of interorgan interactions in drug metabolism using intestinal and liver slices, Lab Chip source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe metabolic functions of the liver are highly dependent on its microstructural architecture, fluid flow patterns, zonal ECM composition, and biochemical (oxygen concentration) gradients.
“The metabolic functions of the liver are highly dependent on its microstructural architecture, fluid flow patterns, zonal ECM composition, and biochemical (oxygen concentration) gradients [74].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Allen, 2003, Formation of steady-state oxygen gradients in vitro: application to liver zonation, Biotechnol. Bioeng. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe acute hepatotoxic dose of APAP causes apoptosis of HepG2 cells within GelMA-encapsulated spheroids, leading to decreased biomarker secretion in the bioreactor system over time.
“The acute hepatotoxic dose of APAP causes apoptosis of HepG2 cells within GelMA encapsulated spheroids, leading to a decrease in the biomarkers secretion levels in the bioreactor system over time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough relative albumin secreted per cell decreased over time, the level was sustained within the range (0.6-80 pg/cell/day) reported in the literature for albumin production per cell by HepG2 cells/spheroids.
“This shows that although the relative albumin secreted per cell decreased overtime, the level was sustained within the range (0.6-80 pg/cell/day) reported in the literature for albumin production per cell by HepG2 cells/ spheroids [63,64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSupportive interactions with non-parenchymal cells, particularly vascular, stromal and immune cell types, are important for maintaining the high proliferative capacity of hepatocytes in 3D cultures.
“Moreover, supportive interactions with non-parenchymal cells, particularly the vascular, stromal and immune cell types, are important for maintaining the high proliferative capacity of hepatocytes in 3D cultures [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Kostadinova, 2013, A long-term three dimensional liver co-culture system for improved prediction of clinically relevant drug-induced hepatotoxicity, Toxicology Appl. Pharmacology source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataThe levels of transferrin secreted by HepG2 cells were comparable to the literature range (0.1-17.2 pg/cell/day).
“transferrin (0.1-17.2 pg/cell/day) [65,67,68]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [65] Bouma, 1989, Further cellular investigation of the human hepatoblastoma-derived cell line HepG2: morphology and immunocytochemical studies of hepatic-secreted proteins., In Vitro Cell. Developmental Biol. : J. Tissue Cult. Assoc. source
- cites [67] Carraro, 2008, In vitro analysis of a hepatic device with intrinsic microvascular-based channels, Biomed. Microdevices source
- cites [68] Iwasa, 1990, Phenotypic variation in human HepG2 hepatoma cells: alterations in cell growth, plasma protein synthesis and heme pathway enzymes, Int. J. Biochem. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed concept of a bioreactor interfaced with bioprinters expands the field of organ-on-a-chip and may be a key step towards fabrication of automated systems for high throughput drug screening.
“The proposed concept of a bioreactor interfaced with bioprinters expands the field of organ-on-a-chip and may be a key step towards the fabrication of automated systems for high throughput drug screening.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe multilayer design was selected so that any introduced bubble would be washed away without getting trapped within the chambers.
“The multilayer design was selected in a way that any introduced bubble would be washed away without getting trapped within the chambers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe successful interfacing of a bioprinting platform with the bioreactor might allow for creation of advanced biomimetic architectures by mimicking distribution of ECM-like biomaterials, hepatic cell types, and their ratios.
“The successful interfacing of a bioprinting platform with the bioreactor, as reported here, might allow for the creation of advanced biomimetic architectures by precisely mimicking the distribution of different ECM-like biomaterials, key hepatic tissue cell types including hepatocytes, stellate, endothelial, and Kupffer cells, and their ratios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe same encapsulation conditions were used for control and experimental groups, so that these conditions did not affect the results.
“Although cell secreted proteins interact with the porous hydrogel scaffold, we used the same encapsulation conditions for control and experimental groups, so that these conditions did not affect the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationThe levels of ceruloplasmin secreted by HepG2 cells were comparable to the literature range (0.1-0.7 pg/cell/day).
“ceruloplasmin (0.1-0.7 pg/cell/day) [68] secreted by HepG2 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Iwasa, 1990, Phenotypic variation in human HepG2 hepatoma cells: alterations in cell growth, plasma protein synthesis and heme pathway enzymes, Int. J. Biochem. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFreshly isolated or cryopreserved primary hepatocytes are the preferred cell source for drug metabolism studies.
“Freshly isolated or cryopreserved primary hepatocytes are the preferred cell source for drug metabolism studies [54][55][56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54][55][56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThere were no issues encountered while disassembling and reassembling the platform during the APAP assessment.
“There were no issues encountered while carefully disassembling and reassembling the platform during this assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe bioprinting approach enabled easy tailoring of other printing parameters such as spheroid concentration per dot and hydrogel composition, as well as controlling multicellular distribution and the geometrical features of the printed construct.
“Also, this bioprinting approach enabled easy tailoring of other printing parameters such as spheroid concentration per dot and hydrogel composition, as well as controlling multicellular distribution and the geometrical features of the printed construct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe response of the liver-on-a-chip platform to APAP treatment was similar to animal and in vitro models, which confirms the possibility of its application for drug toxicity analysis.
“The response of the liver-on-achip platform to APAP treatment was similar to animal and in vitro models, which confirms the possibility of its application for drug toxicity analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe use of bioprinting in the system paved the way for rapid fabrication of the 3D hepatic construct and allowed precise control over the thickness of the hydrogel layer encapsulating the spheroids to maintain consistency in mass diffusion through the hydrogel for all experiments.
“The use of bioprinting in our system not only paved the way for a rapid fabrication of the 3D hepatic construct, but also allowed for a precise control over the thickness of the hydrogel layer encapsulating the spheroids to maintain consistency in mass diffusion through the hydrogel, for all experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The hydrogels can be modeled as a porous medium with a uniform volumetric oxygen consumption rate associated with the total number of encapsulated cells.
“The hydrogels were modeled as a porous media with uniform volumetric oxygen consumption rate associated with the total number of encapsulated cells.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The oxygen concentration at the inlet is constant and uniform.
“The oxygen concentration at the inlet was considered to be constant and uniform.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All boundaries of the bioreactor can be treated as impermeable surfaces for oxygen transport.
“Although PDMS is oxygen permeable [40], since the bioreactor is covered by a impermeable PMMA layer, we considered the worst case scenario and all boundaries were treated as impermeable surfaces.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Primary hepatocytes have limited lifespan, difficulty in obtaining the cell source, and large batch-to-batch variability post-isolation.
“In addition to their limited lifespan, difficulty in obtaining the cell source and large batch-to-batch variability post-isolation are other important challenges associated with the use of primary hepatocytes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Immortalized cell lines offer a cheap and robust platform for initial toxicity evaluation of an array of drug candidates.
“The use of immortalized cell lines offers a cheap and robust platform for initial toxicity evaluation of an array of drug candidates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Issues with cost, availability and batch-to-batch variability make primary hepatocytes a challenging cell source to use.
“However, issues with cost, availability and batch-to-batch variability make primary hepatocytes a challenging cell source to use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
HepG2/C3A cell lines may not express all metabolic enzymes and cannot capture the genetic variability of the patient population.
“Although, these cell lines may not express all metabolic enzymes and cannot capture the genetic variability of the patient population”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Oxygen diffusivity differs tenfold between methods and results
MajorThe methods give an oxygen diffusion coefficient of 3.8 × 10−9 m2/s, but the simulation parameters in the results give 3.8 × 10−8 m2/s. The paper does not make clear which value was used to select the perfusion rate.
“The diffusion coefficient of oxygen in aqueous media at 37 °C was assumed as a reasonable approximation of 3.8×10 -9 m 2 s -1 .”
“oxygen diffusivity=3.8×10-8 m 2 s -1”
Reported cells per dot imply fewer dots than were printed
MinorA 7 × 7 array has 49 dots. The figure caption's 400,000 total cells at 16,000 cells per dot instead implies 25 dots; its day-30 figures imply the same count.
“A 7×7 array was then printed as liquid droplets from this mixture on a glass slide within the cell culture chamber of the bioreactor”
“case A: 400 000 hepatocytes on day 1 (16 000 cells per dot), and case B: 4000 000 hepatocytes on day 30 (160 000 cells per dot).”
Drug-treatment figure caption gives a different study duration
MinorThe results describe monitoring the APAP-treated construct over six days, while the caption for the corresponding biomarker panels says the treatment lasted 30 days.
“the functionality of the construct was monitored over 6 days of culture at multiple time-points.”
“(c)-(f) The levels of hepatic biomarkers secreted by the hepatic construct treated with 15 mM APAP in the bioreactor platform for a period of 30 days,”
Simulated oxygen-consumption parameter uses per-cell units
MinorThe methods define Vmax as a volumetric consumption rate, with units of mol m−3 s−1. The results instead assign it 4.76 × 10−16 mol s−1, the value and units given for consumption by one cell, leaving the stated simulation input inconsistent with its definition.
“where, V max is the maximum volumetric oxygen consumption rate (mol m -3 s -1 )”
“V max =4.76×10-16 mol s -1 [43].”
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687 · see citing works
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip
Huh, D., Matthews, B. D., Mammoto, A., Montoya-Zavala, M., Hsin, H. Y., & Ingber, D. E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188302 · Cited by 4,250 · see citing works
Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2989 · Cited by 3,305 · see citing works
Hydrogels in regenerative medicine
Slaughter, B. V., Khurshid, S. S., Fisher, O. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Peppas, N. A. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200802106 · Cited by 2,703 · see citing works
Self-citationCell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroscale culture of human liver cells for drug development
Khetani, S. R., & Bhatia, S. N. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1361 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity
Kaplowitz, N. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1750 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array
Tung, Y.-C., Hsiao, A. Y., Allen, S. G., Torisawa, Y.-S., Ho, M., & Takayama, S. (2011) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c0an00609b · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1883 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Maschmeyer, I., Lorenz, A. K., Schimek, K., Hasenberg, T., Ramme, A. P., Hübner, J., Lindner, M., Drewell, C., Bauer, S., Thomas, A., et al. (2015) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c5lc00392j · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Wilkening, S., Stahl, F., & Bader, A. (2003) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.31.8.1035 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
Functional Human Vascular Network Generated in Photocrosslinkable Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogels
Chen, Y., Lin, R., Qi, H., Yang, Y., Bae, H., Melero‐Martin, J. M., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201101662 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Self-citationHewitt, N. J., Gómez Lechón, M. J., Houston, J. B., Hallifax, D., Brown, H. S., Maurel, P., Kenna, J. G., Gustavsson, L., Lohmann, C., Skonberg, C., et al. (2007) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.1080/03602530601093489 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels
Bertassoni, L. E., Cardoso, J. C., Manoharan, V., Cristino, A. L., Bhise, N. S., Araujo, W. A., Zorlutuna, P., Vrana, N. E., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Dokmeci, M. R., et al. (2014) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Self-citation3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
Bajaj, P., Schweller, R. M., Khademhosseini, A., West, J. L., & Bashir, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Self-citationAcute liver necrosis following overdose of paracetamol
Davidson, D. G., & Eastham, W. N. (1966) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5512.497 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
3D cell culture systems modeling tumor growth determinants in cancer target discovery
Thoma, C. R., Zimmermann, M., Agarkova, I., Kelm, J. M., & Krek, W. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.001 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Wagner, I., Materne, E.-M., Brincker, S., Süßbier, U., Frädrich, C., Busek, M., Sonntag, F., Sakharov, D. A., Trushkin, E. V., Tonevitsky, A. G., et al. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50234a · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Fabrication of 3D hepatic tissues by additive photopatterning of cellular hydrogels
Tsang, V. L., Chen, A. A., Cho, L. M., Jadin, K. D., Sah, R. L., DeLong, S., West, J. L., & Bhatia, S. N. (2007) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.06-7117com · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Fiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities
Tamayol, A., Akbari, M., Annabi, N., Paul, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Self-citationProgress in tissue engineering
Khademhosseini, A., Vacanti, J. P., & Langer, R. (2009) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0509-64 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Self-citationOrgan-on-a-chip platforms for studying drug delivery systems
Bhise, N. S., Ribas, J., Manoharan, V., Zhang, Y. S., Polini, A., Massa, S., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.004 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationControlling size, shape and homogeneity of embryoid bodies using poly(ethylene glycol) microwells
Karp, J. M., Yeh, J., Eng, G. M., Fukuda, J., Blumling, J., Suh, K. Y., Cheng, J., Mahdavi, A., Borenstein, J. T., Langer, R., et al. (2007) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b705085m · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing
LeCluyse, E. L., Witek, R. P., Andersen, M. E., & Powers, M. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.682115 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Biomimetic tissues on a chip for drug discovery
Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Hancock, M. J., Harrington, H., Kaji, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.10.029 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationThe development of the intrahepatic bile ducts in man: A keratin-immunohistochemical study
Eyken, P. V., Sciot, R., Callea, F., Steen, K. V. D., Moerman, P., & Desmet, V. J. (1988) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840080619 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease
Bhatia, S. N., Underhill, G. H., Zaret, K. S., & Fox, I. J. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005975 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Lee, S.-A., No, D. Y., Kang, E., Ju, J., Kim, D.-S., & Lee, S.-H. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50197c · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Formation of steady‐state oxygen gradients in vitro: <i>Application to liver zonation</i>
Allen, J. W., & Bhatia, S. N. (2003) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.10569 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
CYP induction-mediated drug interactions: in vitro assessment and clinical implications
Lin, J. H. (2006) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-006-0277-7 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Kostadinova, R., Boess, F., Applegate, D., Suter, L., Weiser, T., Singer, T., Naughton, B., & Roth, A. (2013) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.012 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Human liver cell spheroids in extended perfusion bioreactor culture for repeated-dose drug testing
Tostões, R. M., Leite, S. B., Serra, M., Jensen, J., Björquist, P., Carrondo, M. J. T., Brito, C., & Alves, P. M. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24760 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Identification of small molecules for human hepatocyte expansion and iPS differentiation
Shan, J., Schwartz, R. E., Ross, N. T., Logan, D. J., Thomas, D., Duncan, S. A., North, T. E., Goessling, W., Carpenter, A. E., & Bhatia, S. N. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1270 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Treyer, A., & Müsch, A. (2013) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c120009 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Human hepatocytes as a tool for studying toxicity and drug metabolism
Gomez-Lechon, M., Donato, M., Castell, J., & Jover, R. (2003) · Current Drug Metabolism · doi:10.2174/1389200033489424 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Yip, D., & Cho, C. H. (2013) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.008 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Liver-cell patterning lab chip: mimicking the morphology of liver lobule tissue
Ho, C.-T., Lin, R.-Z., Chen, R.-J., Chin, C.-K., Gong, S.-E., Chang, H.-Y., Peng, H.-L., Hsu, L., Yew, T.-R., Chang, S.-F., et al. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50402f · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Biological monitoring of chemical exposures in the workplace
(1992) · doi:10.1039/ap992290211b · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Organs-on-a-chip: a new tool for drug discovery
Polini, A., Prodanov, L., Bhise, N. S., Manoharan, V., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2014.886562 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationMaschmeyer, I., Hasenberg, T., Jaenicke, A., Lindner, M., Lorenz, A., Zech, J., Garbe, L., Sonntag, F., Hayden, P. J., Ayehunie, S., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.002 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Jennen, D. G. J., Magkoufopoulou, C., Ketelslegers, H. B., van Herwijnen, M. H. M., Kleinjans, J. C. S., & van Delft, J. H. M. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq026 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
van Midwoud, P. M., Merema, M. T., Verpoorte, E., & Groothuis, G. M. M. (2010) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c0lc00043d · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Baker, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/471661a · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Fey, S. J., & Wrzesinski, K. (2012) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfs122 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
FEM-based oxygen consumption and cell viability models for avascular pancreatic islets
Buchwald, P. (2009) · Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling · doi:10.1186/1742-4682-6-5 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
A multicellular spheroid array to realize spheroid formation, culture, and viability assay on a chip
Torisawa, Y.-S., Takagi, A., Nashimoto, Y., Yasukawa, T., Shiku, H., & Matsue, T. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.054 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Multi-cellular 3D human primary liver cell culture elevates metabolic activity under fluidic flow
Esch, M. B., Prot, J.-M., Wang, Y. I., Miller, P., Llamas-Vidales, J. R., Naughton, B. A., Applegate, D. R., & Shuler, M. L. (2015) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c5lc00237k · Cited by 173 · see citing works
In vitro analysis of a hepatic device with intrinsic microvascular-based channels
Carraro, A., Hsu, W.-M., Kulig, K. M., Cheung, W. S., Miller, M. L., Weinberg, E. J., Swart, E. F., Kaazempur-Mofrad, M., Borenstein, J. T., Vacanti, J. P., et al. (2008) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-008-9194-3 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Composite living fibers for creating tissue constructs using textile techniques
Akbari, M., Tamayol, A., Laforte, V., Annabi, N., Najafabadi, A. H., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2014) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201303655 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationA microfluidic platform for 3-dimensional cell culture and cell-based assays
Kim, M. S., Yeon, J. H., & Park, J.-K. (2007) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-006-9016-4 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Patterning Methods for Polymers in Cell and Tissue Engineering
Kim, H. N., Kang, D.-H., Kim, M. S., Jiao, A., Kim, D., & Suh, K. Y. (2012) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0510-y · Cited by 165 · see citing works
On being the right size: scaling effects in designing a human-on-a-chip
Moraes, C., Labuz, J. M., Leung, B. M., Inoue, M., Chun, T.-H., & Takayama, S. (2013) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c3ib40040a · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Li, C. Y., Stevens, K. R., Schwartz, R. E., Alejandro, B. S., Huang, J. H., & Bhatia, S. N. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0667 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Bouma, M.-E., Rogier, E., Verthier, N., Labarre, C., & Feldmann, G. (1989) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1007/bf02628465 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Hydrogel-coated microfluidic channels for cardiomyocyte culture
Annabi, N., Selimović, Š., Acevedo Cox, J. P., Ribas, J., Afshar Bakooshli, M., Heintze, D., Weiss, A. S., Cropek, D., & Khademhosseini, A. (2013) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c3lc50252j · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationFraczek, J., Bolleyn, J., Vanhaecke, T., Rogiers, V., & Vinken, M. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0983-3 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Microfluidic devices for in vitro studies on liver drug metabolism and toxicity
van Midwoud, P. M., Verpoorte, E., & Groothuis, G. M. M. (2011) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c0ib00119h · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Ho, W. J., Pham, E. A., Kim, J. W., Ng, C. W., Kim, J. H., Kamei, D. T., & Wu, B. M. (2010) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01723.x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Hemodynamic flow improves rat hepatocyte morphology, function, and metabolic activity in vitro
Dash, A., Simmers, M. B., Deering, T. G., Berry, D. J., Feaver, R. E., Hastings, N. E., Pruett, T. L., LeCluyse, E. L., Blackman, B. R., & Wamhoff, B. R. (2013) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00331.2012 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Technique for the control of spheroid diameter using microfabricated chips
Sakai, Y., & Nakazawa, K. (2007) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2007.06.004 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Lee, J. B., & Sung, J. H. (2013) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201300086 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Transporter-mediated drug interactions: clinical implications andin vitroassessment
Lin, J. H. (2007) · Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology · doi:10.1517/17425255.3.1.81 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Blazer, D. G., & Wu, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02306.x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Design Criteria for Generating Physiologically Relevant In Vitro Models in Bioreactors
Mattei, G., Giusti, S., & Ahluwalia, A. D. (2014) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr2030548 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Fabrication of nature-inspired microfluidic network for perfusable tissue constructs
He, J., Mao, M., Liu, Y., Shao, J., Jin, Z., & Li, D. (2013) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201200404 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Microencapsulated human hepatoma (HepG2) cells: <i>In vitro</i> growth and protein release
Uludag, H., & Sefton, M. V. (1993) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820271002 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Mahto, S. K., Yoon, T. H., & Rhee, S. W. (2010) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.3486610 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Inverse opal scaffolds for applications in regenerative medicine
Zhang, Y. S., Choi, S., & Younan Xia, A. (2013) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c3sm52063c · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationObach, R. S. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fukuda, J., Okamura, K., Nakazawa, K., Ijima, H., Yamashita, Y., Shimada, M., Shirabe, K., Tsujita, E., Sugimachi, K., & Funatsu, K. (2003) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/000000003783985151 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Treyer, A., & Müsch, A. (2013) · Comprehensive physiology · doi:10.1002/j.2040-4603.2013.tb00490.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Magnetically controllable 3D microtissues based on magnetic microcryogels
Liu, W., Li, Y., Feng, S., Ning, J., Wang, J., Gou, M., Chen, H., Xu, F., & Du, Y. (2014) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/c4lc00081a · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Creeping flow through ordered arrays of micro-cylinders embedded in a rectangular minichannel
(2012) · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.03.008 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationOuattara, D. A., Prot, J. M., Bunescu, A., Dumas, M., Elena‐Herrmann, B., Leclerc, É., & Brochot, C. (2012) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c2mb25049g · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Weise, F., Fernekorn, U., Hampl, J., Klett, M., & Schober, A. (2013) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.24912 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fuyuki, I., Galbraith, R. A., & Sassa, S. (1990) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(90)90344-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Maschmeyer, I., Lorenz, A., Ramme, A. P., et al. (2015) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.08.512 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hepatic sublobular synthesis of urea: control by oxygen or by pH gradient?
Haüssinger, D. (1988) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840080134 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Luiz, 2014, Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels, Biofabrication, 6, 10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105 · DOI · Paper page
- Nichol, 2010, Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels, Biomaterials, 31, 5536, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156 · see citing works
Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip
Zhang, Y. S., Arneri, A., Bersini, S., Shin, S.-R., Zhu, K., Goli-Malekabadi, Z., Aleman, J., Colosi, C., Busignani, F., Dell’Erba, V., et al. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.003 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y. S., Aleman, J., Shin, S. R., Kilic, T., Kim, D., Mousavi Shaegh, S. A., Massa, S., Riahi, R., Chae, S., Hu, N., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612906114 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment
Huang, G., Li, F., Zhao, X., Ma, Y., Li, Y., Lin, M., Jin, G., Lu, T. J., Genin, G. M., & Xu, F. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00094 · Cited by 825 · see citing works
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
Moroni, L., Burdick, J. A., Highley, C., Lee, S. J., Morimoto, Y., Takeuchi, S., & Yoo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0006-y · Cited by 753 · see citing works
3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication
Zhang, Y. S., Yue, K., Aleman, J., Mollazadeh‐Moghaddam, K., Bakht, S. M., Yang, J., Jia, W., Dell’Erba, V., Assawes, P., Shin, S. R., et al. (2016) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Self-citationOrgans-on-a-Chip: A Fast Track for Engineered Human Tissues in Drug Development
Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.011 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Unagolla, J. M., & Jayasuriya, A. C. (2019) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration
Cui, H., Nowicki, M. A., Fisher, J. P., & Zhang, L. G. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201601118 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting
Levato, R., Jüngst, T., Scheuring, R. G., Blunk, T., Gröll, J., & Malda, J. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201906423 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting
Panwar, A., & Tan, L. P. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21060685 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine
Dzobo, K., Thomford, N. E., Senthebane, D. A., Shipanga, H., Rowe, A., Dandara, C., Pillay, M., & Motaung, K. S. (2018) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2018/2495848 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Engineered materials for organoid systems
Kratochvil, M. J., Seymour, A. J., Li, T. L., Pașca, S. P., Kuo, C. J., & Heilshorn, S. C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0129-9 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Fundamentals and Applications of Photo-Cross-Linking in Bioprinting
Lim, K. S., Galarraga, J. H., Cui, X., Lindberg, G. C. J., Burdick, J. A., & Woodfield, T. B. F. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00812 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
Choi, J. R., Yong, K. W., Choi, J. Y., & Cowie, A. C. (2019) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/btn-2018-0083 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels
GhavamiNejad, A., Ashammakhi, N. A., Wu, X. Y., & Khademhosseini, A. (2020) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202002931 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Self-citationMa, X., Liu, J., Zhu, W. Z., Tang, M., Lawrence, N., Yu, C., Gou, M., & Chen, S. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.011 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Zhang, Y. S., Haghiashtiani, G., Hübscher, T., Kelly, D. J., Lee, J. M., Lütolf, M. P., McAlpine, M. C., Yeong, W. Y., Zenobi‐Wong, M., & Malda, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00073-8 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Self-citationElectrospinning: An enabling nanotechnology platform for drug delivery and regenerative medicine
Chen, S., Li, R., Li, X., & Xie, J. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.001 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Achberger, K., Probst, C., Haderspeck, J., Bolz, S., Rogal, J., Chuchuy, J., Nikolova, M., Cora, V., Antkowiak, L., Haq, W., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46188 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Lee, H., & Cho, D.-W. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00450d · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Three-dimensional cell culture systems as an in vitro platform for cancer and stem cell modeling
Chaicharoenaudomrung, N., Kunhorm, P., & Noisa, P. (2019) · World Journal of Stem Cells · doi:10.4252/wjsc.v11.i12.1065 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Advances in Hydrogels in Organoids and Organs‐on‐a‐Chip
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Cui, K., Guo, Y., Zhang, X., & Qin, J. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902042 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Bioprinting: From Tissue and Organ Development to in Vitro Models
Mota, C., Camarero‐Espinosa, S., Baker, M. B., Wieringa, P. A., & Moroni, L. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Levato, R., Webb, W. R., Otto, I. A., Mensinga, A., Zhang, Y., van Rijen, M. H. P., van Weeren, P. R., Khan, I. M., & Malda, J. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Self-citationPrint Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet
Ng, W. L., Chua, C. K., & Shen, Y. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system
Kim, B. S., Lee, J., Gao, G., & Cho, D. (2017) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Organ-Derived Decellularized Extracellular Matrix: A Game Changer for Bioink Manufacturing?
Choudhury, D., Tun, H. W., Wang, T., & Naing, M. W. (2018) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Emerging Technologies in Multi‐Material Bioprinting
Ravanbakhsh, H., Karamzadeh, V., Bao, G., Mongeau, L., Juncker, D., & Zhang, Y. S. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202104730 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomaterials-based 3D cell printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics
Jang, J., Park, J. Y., Gao, G., & Cho, D. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Engineering Multi‐Cellular Spheroids for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Kim, S., Kim, E. M., Yamamoto, M., Park, H., & Shin, H. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202000608 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Advances in 3D bioprinting of tissues/organs for regenerative medicine and in-vitro models.
Jain, P., Kathuria, H., & Dubey, N. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121639 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Additive Manufacturing of Precision Biomaterials
Guzzi, E. A., & Tibbitt, M. W. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901994 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Optimization of collagen type I-hyaluronan hybrid bioink for 3D bioprinted liver microenvironments
Mazzocchi, A. R., Devarasetty, M., Huntwork, R. C., Söker, S., & Skardal, A. (2018) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aae543 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Shin, S. R., Zhang, Y. S., Kim, D. J., Manbohi, A., Avcı, H., Silvestri, A., Aleman, J., Hu, N., Kiliç, T., Keung, W., et al. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02028 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationDeng, J., Wei, W., Chen, Z., Lin, B., Zhao, W., Luo, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi10100676 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Cell sources for <i>in vitro</i> human liver cell culture models
Zeilinger, K., Freyer, N., Damm, G., Seehofer, D., & Knöspel, F. (2016) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370216657448 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Costa, E. C., de Melo‐Diogo, D., Moreira, A. F., Carvalho, M. P., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201700417 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Microfluidics in nanoparticle drug delivery; From synthesis to pre-clinical screening
Ahn, J., Ko, J., Lee, S., Yu, J., Kim, Y., & Jeon, N. L. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.04.001 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models of human liver tissue
Moradi, E., Jalili‐Firoozinezhad, S., & Solati‐Hashjin, M. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.041 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs
Zhang, B., Gao, L., Ma, L., Luo, Y.-C., Yang, H.-Y., & Cui, Z. (2019) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.009 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Bioprinting towards physiologically relevant tissue models for pharmaceutics
Peng, W., Unutmaz, D., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.013 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications
Tetsuka, H., & Shin, S. R. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d0tb00034e · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Self-citation3D Printing of Organs-On-Chips
Yi, H., Lee, H., & Cho, D. (2017) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering4010010 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Chitosan-based inks for 3D printing and bioprinting
Taghizadeh, M., Taghizadeh, A. A., Yazdi, M. K., Zarrintaj, P., Stadler, F. J., Ramsey, J. D., Habibzadeh, S., Rad, S. H., Naderi, G., Saeb, M. R., et al. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc01799c · Cited by 194 · see citing works
The arrival of commercial bioprinters – Towards 3D bioprinting revolution!
Choudhury, D., Anand, S., & Naing, M. W. (2024) · International Journal of Bioprinting · doi:10.18063/ijb.v4i2.139 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Cell-printed 3D liver-on-a-chip possessing a liver microenvironment and biliary system
Lee, H., Chae, S., Kim, J. Y., Han, W., Kim, J., Choi, Y., & Cho, D. (2018) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aaf9fa · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Flores-Garza, B. G., Tavares-Negrete, J. A., Lara-Mayorga, I. M., González-Gamboa, I., Zhang, Y. S., Rojas-Martínez, A., Ortiz-López, R., & Álvarez, M. M. (2019) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma12182945 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
“Several techniques also involve the use of semi-synthetic polymers, such as gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) [166] based hydrogels [135,167], or self-assembling peptides, such as RADA16-I, Q11, and bQ13, that can form gels under specific conditions (e.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMicrofluidic Organ-on-A-chip: A Guide to Biomaterial Choice and Fabrication
Cao, U. M. N., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Sayson, D., Pillai, S., & Tran, S. D. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24043232 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationShin, S. R., Kiliç, T., Zhang, Y. S., Avcı, H., Hu, N., Kim, D. J., Branco, C., Aleman, J., Massa, S., Silvestri, A., et al. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600522 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationRiahi, R., Shaegh, S. A. M., Ghaderi, M., Zhang, Y. S., Shin, S. R., Aleman, J., Massa, S., Kim, D. J., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24598 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationMehta, V., & Rath, S. N. (2021) · Bio-Design and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s42242-020-00112-5 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
3D bioprinting: current status and trends—a guide to the literature and industrial practice
Santoni, S., Gugliandolo, S. G., Sponchioni, M., Moscatelli, D., & Colosimo, B. M. (2021) · Bio-Design and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Ma, L.-D., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Wu, J., Meng, X., Hu, P., Mu, X., Liang, Q., & Luo, G. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00333e · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Bioprinted 3D vascularized tissue model for drug toxicity analysis
Massa, S., Sakr, M. A., Seo, J., Bandaru, P., Arneri, A., Bersini, S., Zare‐Eelanjegh, E., Jalilian, E., Cha, B.-H., Antona, S., et al. (2017) · Biomicrofluidics · doi:10.1063/1.4994708 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citation3D Printed Cartilage‐Like Tissue Constructs with Spatially Controlled Mechanical Properties
de Melo, B. A. G., Jodat, Y. A., Mehrotra, S., Calabrese, M. A., Kamperman, T., Mandal, B. B., Santana, M. H. A., Alsberg, E., Leijten, J., & Shin, S. R. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906330 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrofluidic bioprinting for organ-on-a-chip models
Yu, F., & Choudhury, D. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.03.025 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
PDMS-Based Microfluidic Devices for Cell Culture
Torino, S., Corrado, B., Iodice, M., & Coppola, G. (2018) · Inventions · doi:10.3390/inventions3030065 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Development of an in vitro human liver system for interrogating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Feaver, R. E., Cole, B. K., Lawson, M. J., Hoang, S. A., Marukian, S., Blackman, B. R., Figler, R. A., Sanyal, A. J., Wamhoff, B. R., & Dash, A. (2016) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.90954 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Liver-Kidney-on-Chip To Study Toxicity of Drug Metabolites
Theobald, J., Ghanem, A., Wallisch, P., Banaeiyan, A. A., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., Taškova, K., Haltmeier, M., Kurtz, A., Becker, H., Reuter, S., et al. (2017) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00417 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks
Adhikari, J., Roy, A., Das, A., Ghosh, M., Thomas, S., Sinha, A., Kim, J., & Saha, P. (2020) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202000179 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Raimondi, I., Izzo, L., Tunesi, M., Comar, M., Albani, D., & Giordano, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00435 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
A Bioprinted Liver-on-a-Chip for Drug Screening Applications
Knowlton, S. M., & Taşoğlu, S. (2016) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.014 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Lu, S., Cuzzucoli, F., Jiang, J., Liang, L.-G., Wang, Y., Kong, M., Zhao, X., Cui, W., Li, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00852c · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Kizawa, H., Nagao, E., Shimamura, M., Zhang, G., & Torii, H. (2017) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.04.004 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Lee, J., Mehrotra, S., Zare‐Eelanjegh, E., Rodrigues, R. O., Akbarinejad, A., Ge, D., Amato, L., Kiaee, K., Fang, Y., Rosenkranz, A., et al. (2020) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202004258 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationDrug Toxicity Evaluation Based on Organ-on-a-chip Technology: A Review
Cong, Y., Han, X., Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Lu, Y., Liu, T., Wu, Z., Jin, Y., Luo, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi11040381 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Applications of 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Saini, G., Segaran, N. L., Mayer, J., Saini, A., Albadawi, H., & Öklü, R. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10214966 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Enabling personalized implant and controllable biosystem development through 3D printing
Nagarajan, N., Dupret‐Bories, A., Karabulut, E., Zorlutuna, P., & Vrana, N. E. (2018) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.02.004 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Liver Organoids: Recent Developments, Limitations and Potential
Harrison, S. P., Baumgarten, S., Verma, R., Lunov, O., Dejneka, A., & Sullivan, G. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.574047 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Organ‐on‐a‐Chip: A Preclinical Microfluidic Platform for the Progress of Nanomedicine
Rodrigues, R. O., Sousa, P. C., Gaspar, J., Bañobre‐López, M., Lima, R. A., & Minas, G. M. H. (2020) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202003517 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Emerging trends in organ-on-a-chip systems for drug screening
Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Pan, Y., Zhou, D., Liu, Y., Yin, Y. B., Yang, J., Wang, Y., & Song, Y. (2023) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2023.02.006 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
In Vitro Models for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Emerging Platforms and Their Applications
Ramos, M. J., Bandiera, L., Menolascina, F., & Fallowfield, J. A. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103549 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Fernández-Checa, J. C., Bagnaninchi, P., Ye, H., Sancho‐Bru, P., Falcón‐Pérez, J. M., Royo, F., García‐Ruiz, C., Konu, Ö., Miranda, J. P., Lunov, O., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.021 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Cancer-on-a-chip systems at the frontier of nanomedicine
Zhang, Y. S., Zhang, Y.-N., & Zhang, W. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.03.011 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationEmulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine
Fonseca, A. C., Melchels, F. P. W., Ferreira, M. J. S., Moxon, S. R., Potjewyd, G., Dargaville, T. R., Kimber, S. J., & Domingos, M. A. N. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00342 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
3D Printing Techniques and Their Applications to Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms: A Systematic Review
Carvalho, V. M., Gonçalves, I. M., Lage, T., Rodrigues, R. O., Minas, G. M. H., Teixeira, S., Moita, A., Hori, T., Kaji, H., & Lima, R. A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093304 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Current progress in hepatic tissue regeneration by tissue engineering
Hosseini, V., Maroufi, N. F., Saghati, S., Asadi, N., Darabi, M., Ahmad, S. N. S., Hosseinkhani, H., & Rahbarghazi, R. (2019) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-019-02137-6 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
3D Cell Printed Tissue Analogues: A New Platform for Theranostics
Choi, Y., Yi, H., Kim, S.-W., & Cho, D. (2017) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.19396 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Current Advances on 3D‐Bioprinted Liver Tissue Models
Ma, L., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Aazmi, A., Zhou, H., Zhang, B., & Yang, H. (2020) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202001517 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Human-Derived Organ-on-a-Chip for Personalized Drug Development
Jodat, Y. A., Kang, M., Kiaee, K., Kim, G. J., Martinez, A. F. H., Rosenkranz, A., Bae, H., & Shin, S. R. (2019) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612825666190308150055 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategies for 3D bioprinting of spheroids: A comprehensive review
Banerjee, D., Singh, Y. P., Datta, P., Özbolat, V., O'Donnell, A., Yeo, M., & Ozbolat, I. T. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121881 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
3D Bioprinting at the Frontier of Regenerative Medicine, Pharmaceutical, and Food Industries
Ramadan, Q., & Zourob, M. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Medical Technology · doi:10.3389/fmedt.2020.607648 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Rosellini, E., Zhang, Y. S., Migliori, B., Barbani, N., Lazzeri, L., Shin, S. R., Dokmeci, M. R., & Cascone, M. G. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36272 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in Organ-on-a-Chip Materials and Devices
Nahak, B. K., Mishra, A., Preetam, S., & Tiwari, A. (2022) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.2c00041 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Griffin, K. H., Fok, S. W., & Leach, J. K. (2022) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41536-022-00266-z · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Tan, B., Gan, S., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Li, X. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d1tb00172h · Cited by 121 · see citing works
In Vitro Strategies to Vascularize 3D Physiologically Relevant Models
Dellaquila, A., Le Bao, C., Letourneur, D., & Simon‐Yarza, T. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202100798 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Fowler, S., Chen, W. L. K., Duignan, D. B., Gupta, A., Hariparsad, N., Kenny, J. R., Lai, W. G., Liras, J., Phillips, J. A., & Gan, J. (2020) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c9lc00857h · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Bioprinting of 3D tissues/organs combined with microfluidics
Ma, J., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c8ra03022g · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Towards Single-Step Biofabrication of Organs on a Chip via 3D Printing
Knowlton, S. M., Yenilmez, B., & Taşoğlu, S. (2016) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.005 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
A decade of progress in liver regenerative medicine
Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Liang, L., Li, J., Demirci, U., & Wang, S. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.027 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“In another study, 2 bioprinted hepatic spheroids in GelMA were also tested with acetaminophen in a liver-on-a-chip 3 platform [95].”
MethodTissue Engineering in Liver Regenerative Medicine: Insights into Novel Translational Technologies
Heydari, Z., Najimi, M., Mirzaei, H., Shpichka, A. I., Ruoß, M., Farzaneh, Z., Montazeri, L., Piryaei, A., Timashev, P. S., Gramignoli, R., et al. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9020304 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Liver organ-on-chip models for toxicity studies and risk assessment
Messelmani, T., Morisseau, L., Sakai, Y., Legallais, C., Goff, A. L., Leclerc, É., & Jellali, R. (2022) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d2lc00307d · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Dabbagh, S. R., Sarabi, M. R., Birtek, M. T., Mustafaoğlu, N., Zhang, Y. S., & Taşoğlu, S. (2022) · Aggregate · doi:10.1002/agt2.197 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancement of Sensor Integrated Organ-on-Chip Devices
Clarke, G. A., Hartse, B. X., Asli, A. E. N., Taghavimehr, M., Hashemi, N., Shirsavar, M. A., Montazami, R., Alimoradi, N., Nasirian, V., Ouedraogo, L. J. G., et al. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041367 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Strategies for Tissue EngineeringPreprint
Zhang, Y. S., Öklü, R., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a025718 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationOlgasi, C., Cucci, A., & Follenzi, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21176215 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Addressing Unmet Clinical Needs with 3D Printing Technologies
Ghosh, U., Ning, S., Wang, Y., & Kong, Y. L. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201800417 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The Role of Microfluidics for Organ on Chip Simulations
Aziz, A. U. R., Geng, C., Fu, M., Yu, X., Qin, K., & Liu, B. (2017) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering4020039 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhise, N. S., Manoharan, V., Massa, S., Tamayol, A., Ghaderi, M., Miscuglio, M., Lang, Q., Shrike Zhang, Y., Shin, S. R., Calzone, G., Annabi, N., Shupe, T. D., Bishop, C. E., Atala, A., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Biomaterials Innovation Research Center, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115,
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tamayol, Ali
- Khademhosseini, Ali
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biofabrication
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-01-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 014101
- ISSN
- 1758-5082 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5090
- OpenAlex
- W2232645088
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 23
- FWCI
- 31.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biofabrication (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Keywords
- liver-on-a-chip, HepG2/C3A cells, 3D bioreactor, GelMA hydrogel, bioprinting, drug toxicity assessment, acetaminophen toxicity, hepatocyte function, albumin secretion, MRP2, ZO-1 tight junction, in vitro toxicity models
- MeSH terms
- Biological Assay, Equipment Design, Humans, Organ Culture Techniques, Toxicity Tests, Spheroids, Cellular, Liver, Artificial, Equipment Failure Analysis, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices, Hep G2 Cells, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review