CO2 emissions from crop residue-derived biofuels
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of alternative land use as a baseline may only be reasonable if the alternative system is practical, verifiable, and likely (Robertson et al., 2014; Sheehan et al., 2014).
“The use of alternative land use as a baseline may only be reasonable if the alternative system is practical, verifiable, and likely (Robertson et al. , 2014; Sheehan et al. , 2014).”
From Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life‐cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol (2016) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2014
Soil organic carbon loss might be controlled, to a certain degree, through appropriate residue management such as limited amount of residue removal and additional organic matter inputs.
“the SOC loss might be controlled, to a certain degree, through an appropriate residue management such as the limited amount of residue removal and additional organic matter inputs”
From Bioenergy production and environmental impacts (2018) · cites this paper as Robertson et al. 2014
Partial residue removal together with additional organic matter inputs (e.g., manure application, cover crop) can maintain soil carbon level and sustain soil quality.
“It is worth noting that many studies suggested that partial residue removal, as it is normally being done, together with additional organic matter inputs (e.g., manure application, cover crop) can maintain soil carbon level and sustain soil quality [72,73].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Robertson, G. P., Grace, P. R., Izaurralde, R. C., Parton, W. P., & Zhang, X.
- Affiliations
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, G. Philip
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2014-10-29
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 933-934
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2070749505
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- CO2 emissions, crop residues, biofuels, bioenergy, environmental impact, greenhouse gas emissions, bioenergy production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
