Causal feedbacks in climate change
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internal feedbacks sustain alternative ecological states, consistent with tipping point theory.
“These dynamics align with tipping point theory, where internal feedbacks sustain alternative ecological states 61 .”
From Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models (2025) · cites this paper as [61]
The available indexed passages contain bibliographic metadata and keywords, not the paper’s substantive discussion (the records labelled Abstract have no abstract text). Searches for internal feedbacks sustaining alternative ecological states and for alternative stable states and tipping points found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models
Melnikova, I., Hajima, T., Shiogama, H., Hayashi, M., Ito, A., Nishina, K., Tachiiri, K., & Yokohata, T. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02606-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M., Brovkin, V., Lenton, T. M., Ye, H., Deyle, E., & Sugihara, G.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sugihara, George
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2015-03-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-448
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2008871170
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/G018332/2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- climate feedbacks, greenhouse gases, causality, dynamical systems theory, glacial-interglacial cycles, last deglaciation, ice core records, Antarctic temperature, natural climate variability, orbital forcing, nonlinear time series
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
