Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models
Open accessAbstract
The Amazon rainforest, the world’s largest tropical forest, plays a crucial role in climate regulation but faces risks of dieback under climate change. Here, we examine the Amazon dieback projections from state-of-the-art Earth System Models under high-emission scenarios extending into the 23rd century. Unlike previous studies focused on rapid changes, we investigate both rapid and gradual dieback, capturing drastic productivity declines (>80%). Nine of twelve models project Amazon dieback with variations in timing and spatial extent. The dieback onset is projected within the 21st century under global warming levels ranging from 1.5 to 10.2 °C, triggered by local surface air temperatures above 32.2 ± 4.8 °C and precipitation below 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year−1, exacerbated by land-use change. We identify large-scale atmospheric circulation changes causing regional drying and warming and examine ecosystem processes contributing to dieback. These findings refine our understanding of Amazon dieback thresholds and mechanisms, highlighting areas for model improvement. Future Amazon dieback could occur during the 21st century, triggered by local annual surface air temperatures above 32.2 °C and precipitation below 1394.3 mm per year, and exacerbated by land-use change, according to an analysis of Earth System Model projections under different levels of warming
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Nine of twelve CMIP5/CMIP6 Earth System Models project Amazon dieback under RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 by the end of the 23rd century, with onset often in the 21st century and completion around 2195. Dieback is associated with local surface air temperatures above 32.2 ± 4.8 °C, precipitation below 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year⁻¹, and land-use change.
Key findings
- Nine of twelve ESMs project substantial GPP reductions and identified dieback; largest dieback areas reach up to two million km² (HadGEM2-ES, CanESM5, IPSL-CM6A-LR, UKESM1-0-LL), while CESM2-WACCM projects less than 0.1 million km². Mean dieback area across models is 1.0 ± 0.8 million km².
- On average, dieback onset is projected around year 2087 ± 49 and completion around 2195 ± 25; six of nine dieback models project onset within the 21st century. GSAT at onset ranges from 1.5 °C to 10.2 °C, with an inter-model mean of 5.0 ± 2.9 °C.
- Local thresholds at dieback onset average 32.2 ± 4.8 °C surface air temperature and 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year⁻¹ precipitation. Temperature is the dominant driver in most models, though precipitation is strong in some CMIP5 models.
- The dieback region shifts from a carbon sink to a temporary carbon source of up to 0.5 GtC year⁻¹ during the 22nd century, returning to near-neutral or weak source conditions by the 23rd century.
Methods
- Analyzed concentration-driven historical and RCP8.5 (CMIP5) or SSP5-8.5 (CMIP6) ESM outputs with carbon-cycle variables extending beyond the 21st century, including GPP, temperature, precipitation, LAI, NPP, respiration, vegetation and soil carbon, and land-use fluxes.
- Defined dieback in grid cells with >80% decrease in mean GPP from 2259–2299 compared to 1859–1899 and historical GPP >2 kgC m⁻² year⁻¹. Onset was identified from a Savitzky-Golay–smoothed GPP derivative falling below −0.05; completion when smoothed GPP dropped to 20 ± 1% of maximum.
- Used z-scored logistic regression to assess temperature versus precipitation influence, Köppen-Geiger classification for climate shifts, and diagnostics for AMOC and ENSO-like SST gradients.
Limitations
- Stated: coarse spatial resolution can produce adjacent dieback and non-dieback grid cells; ESMs typically lack lateral ecological interactions, potentially overestimating Amazon stability; fire modules are limited and inconsistent, so fire impacts are likely underestimated; nutrient limitation is poorly represented, with all non-dieback models lacking a nitrogen cycle; tree mortality thresholds are highly uncertain; Köppen-Geiger categories may miss ecological thresholds; piControl drift was not corrected.
- Stated: models with high equilibrium climate sensitivity overestimate present-day surface air temperature in dieback regions, reducing confidence in their dieback timing; many models do not account for acclimation processes that could mitigate dieback.
- Evident from the text: the study is restricted to high-emission RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 scenarios, land cover is assumed constant after 2100, and the 80% GPP-loss definition is a study-specific threshold that may not capture all gradual or abrupt ecosystem transitions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
15 of 25 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Observational studies suggest that local temperature and precipitation thresholds for dieback vary substantially depending on ecological and species-specific factors.
“Moreover, observational studies suggest that local temperature and precipitation thresholds for dieback vary substantially depending on ecological and species-specific factors 56,57 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Powers, J. S. et al. A catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 3122–3133 (2020). source
The Results (page unavailable) report that mortality during the 2015 drought varied greatly among species, and a further results passage links mortality to hydraulic traits and rainfall seasonality. The paper does not establish varying local temperature or precipitation thresholds for dieback; its thresholds concern plant hydraulic function, not climate conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [57] McDowell, N. et al. Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. N. Phytol. 219, 851–869 (2018). source
The ESM discussion (pp. 19, 23) says climate-envelope models miss variation across climates, species, and topography, and that trees do not all share the same drought-response threshold. But the paper does not report observationally established local temperature and precipitation thresholds for dieback; it calls for experiments to investigate threshold responses (p. 22). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
In some regions, model-derived GPP exceeds observational products by more than 1 kgC m−2 year−1, indicating substantial biases in magnitude and spatial patterns.
“In some regions, model-derived GPP exceeds observational products by more than 1 kgC m -2 year -1 , highlighting substantial biases in both magnitude and spatial patterns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, models that sustain higher Amazon GPP under moderate warming tend to experience more abrupt GPP losses once higher GSAT levels are reached.
“On average, models that sustain higher Amazon GPP under moderate warming tend to experience more abrupt GPP losses once higher GSAT levels are reached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The western-high/eastern-low GPP pattern is not supported by FLUXCOM-X or MUSES.
“This pattern is not supported by the machine learning-based FLUXCOM-X product, which is trained on eddy covariance flux tower data 31 , nor by the satellite-based MUSES product 32 (Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
HadGEM2-ES, CanESM5, IPSL-CM6A-LR and UKESM1-0-LL project the largest dieback areas, covering up to two million km2.
“HadGEM2-ES, CanESM5, IPSL-CM6A-LR and UKESM1-0-LL project the largest dieback areas, covering up to two million km 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The majority of models with Amazon dieback (six out of nine) project the onset of Amazon dieback within the 21st century.
“Applying this approach, we find that the majority of the models with Amazon dieback (six out of nine) project the onset of Amazon dieback within the 21st century (Figs. 2, S2 and Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The contributions of temperature and precipitation are comparable for ACCESS-ESM1-5, IPSL-CM6A-LR and UKESM1-0-LL.
“The contributions of temperature and precipitation are comparable for ACCESS-ESM1-5, IPSL-CM6A-LR and UKESM1-0-LL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, annual precipitation below 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year−1 is associated with the onset of Amazon dieback.
“On average, annual local surface air temperature above 32.2 ± 4.8 °C and precipitation below 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year -1 are associated with the onset of the Amazon dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Models with higher ECS, such as CanESM5 and IPSL-CM5A-LR, substantially overestimate present-day surface air temperature in the dieback-affected region.
“Moreover, models with higher ECS-such as CanESM5 and IPSL-CM5A-LR-substantially overestimate present-day surface air temperature in the dieback-affected region (Tables 1, 2, Fig. 2b, see also black markers in Fig. 3, and refs.33,34).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BCC-CSM1-1, MPI-ESM-LR, ACCESS-ESM1-5, CanESM5 and UKESM1-0-LL exhibit higher present-day GPP in western Amazonia compared to the eastern region.
“Two CMIP5 ESMs, namely BCC-CSM1-1, MPI-ESM-LR and three CMIP6 ESMs, namely ACCESS-ESM1-5, CanESM5 and UKESM1-0-LL, exhibit higher present-day GPP in western Amazonia compared to the eastern region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CESM2-WACCM projects the smallest dieback area, less than 0.1 million km2.
“In contrast, CESM2-WACCM projects the smallest dieback area, less than 0.1 million km 2 (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Land-use change exacerbates Amazon dieback.
“exacerbated by land-use change.”
- Also stated in: § Amazon dieback mechanisms: climate · hedged
“While projections by some models suggest that LUC can accelerate dieback, other models suggest the dieback can occur even in native vegetation grid cells, independent of deforestation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Amazon dieback mechanisms: climate · hedged
- Findingnone given
Models with smaller dieback areas, such as ACCESS-ESM1-5, CCSM4 and CESM2-WACCM, exhibit a gradual decline in GPP starting in the early 2000s.
“Models with smaller dieback areas, such as ACCESS-ESM1-5, CCSM4 and CESM2-WACCM, exhibit a gradual decline in GPP, starting in the early 2000s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most ESMs project the dieback process to extend over a century.
“However, most ESMs project the dieback process to extend over a century (Table 2, Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nine of twelve Earth System Models project Amazon dieback by the end of the 23rd century under high-emission scenarios.
“Nine of twelve models project Amazon dieback with variations in timing and spatial extent.”
- Also stated in: § Amazon dieback timing, spatial extent and implications · plain
“By the end of the 23rd century, nine out of twelve ESMs project substantial reductions in GPP, with identified dieback (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Amazon dieback timing, spatial extent and implications · plain
- Findingown data
MPI-ESM-LR simulates a moderate GPP decline in the northeastern Amazon that remains below the 80% decrease threshold used to define dieback in this study.
“MPI-ESM-LR, on the other hand, simulates a moderate GPP decline in the northeastern Amazon, but this remains below the 80% decrease threshold used to define dieback in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Amazon dieback region, models simulate a temporary carbon source of up to 0.5 GtC year-1.
“In the Amazon dieback region, models simulate a temporary carbon source of up to 0.5 GtC year -1 , with regional climate consequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CMIP5 models BCC-CSM1-1, GISS-E2-R and MPI-ESM-LR do not project Amazon dieback.
“Three CMIP5 models-BCC-CSM1-1, GISS-E2-R and MPI-ESM-LR-do not project Amazon dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most models project a return to carbon neutrality by the 23rd century.
“Although most models project a return to carbon neutrality by the 23rd century, the transient reversal from sink to source highlights the complex interplay between climate and carbon cycle dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BCC-CSM1-1 and GISS-E2-R project future GPP increases across much of the Amazon region.
“Notably, GISS-E2-R estimates the highest historical GPP, while BCC-CSM1-1 and GISS-E2-R project future GPP increases across much of the region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
BCC-CSM1-1 projects increased precipitation in the analysed grid cells.
“In contrast, BCC-CSM1-1 projects increased precipitation in these grid cells, likely due to a northward ITCZ shift (Figs.S3a, S7), creating more humid conditions that prevent dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ESM-based dieback threshold is slightly higher than the 2.0-6.0 °C range identified by McKay et al. as a tipping point for the Amazon rainforest.
“This ESM-based threshold is slightly higher than the 2.0-6.0 °C range identified by McKay et al. 1 as a tipping point for the Amazon rainforest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] McKay, D. I. A. et al. Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022). source
- Findingown data
GISS-E2-R estimates the highest historical GPP among the models examined.
“Notably, GISS-E2-R estimates the highest historical GPP, while BCC-CSM1-1 and GISS-E2-R project future GPP increases across much of the region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, ESMs project the onset of Amazon dieback by the late 21st century under 5.0 ± 1.9 °C of global warming, ranging from 1.5 to 10.2 °C.
“On average, ESMs project the onset of Amazon dieback by the late 21st century under 5.0 ± 1.9 °C of global warming (ranging from 1.5 to 10.2 °C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Localised dieback in CanESM5 coincides with mean annual surface air temperatures reaching 42.2 ± 1.5 °C in affected regions.
“Localised dieback in this model coincides with mean annual surface air temperatures reaching 42.2 ± 1.5 °C in affected regions (Table 2, Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Under RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5, changes in forest productivity and biomass strongly depend on variations in precipitation and surface air temperature within the dieback grid cells.
“Under the considered RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, changes in forest productivity and biomass strongly depend on variations in precipitation and surface air temperature within the dieback grid cells (Figs. 3 and S5, see also Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across models, the Amazon dieback region is projected to shift from a carbon sink to a temporary carbon source of up to 0.5 GtC year−1 during the 22nd century.
“Across models, the Amazon dieback region is projected to shift from a carbon sink to a temporary carbon source of up to 0.5 GtC year -1 during the 22nd century (Fig. S3l).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By the 23rd century, all models project a return to near-neutral or weak source conditions in the Amazon dieback region.
“By the 23rd century, all models project a return to near-neutral or weak source conditions in the region (Fig. S3k).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GISS-E2-R shows only a slight GPP decrease in response to moderate warming (>32 °C) and severe precipitation loss (<500 mm year-1).
“GISS-E2-R shows only a slight GPP decrease in response to moderate warming (>32 °C) and severe precipitation loss (<500 mm year -1 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Temperature rise, precipitation decline and land-use disturbances are key drivers reducing Amazon resilience.
“We identify temperature rise, precipitation decline and land-use disturbances as key drivers reducing Amazon resilience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The adjacent dieback/GPP-increase pattern likely arises because adjacent grid cells represent different vegetation types with varying resilience to changing climatic conditions.
“This pattern likely arises because adjacent grid cells represent different vegetation types (e.g.forest and grassland), each spanning large areas.The different vegetation types, in turn, exhibit varying levels of resilience to changing climatic conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The warm bias in present-day surface air temperature in the Amazon region reduces confidence in the projection of dieback timing and progression by models with higher ECS.
“This warm bias in present-day surface air temperature in the Amazon region reduces confidence in their projection of dieback timing and progression (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Large-scale atmospheric circulation changes cause regional drying and warming in the Amazon.
“We identify large-scale atmospheric circulation changes causing regional drying and warming and examine ecosystem processes contributing to dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of lateral ecological interactions in coupled ESMs may lead to an overestimation of the Amazon rainforest's stability.
“This limitation may lead to an overestimation of the Amazon rainforest's stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because the climatic conditions in MPI-ESM-LR and GISS-E2-R overlap with those in models that do project dieback, these ESMs likely employ a more relaxed carbon cycle parameterisation.
“Since these climatic conditions overlap with those in models that do project dieback, we suggest that these ESMs employ a more relaxed carbon cycle parameterisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Many models do not account for acclimation processes to changing environmental conditions, which could potentially mitigate large-scale dieback in simulations.
“On the contrary, many models do not account for acclimation processes to changing environmental conditions, which could potentially mitigate large-scale dieback in simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Differences in carbon cycle parameterisations likely play a key role in the absence of dieback in some models.
“This suggests that differences in carbon cycle parameterisations likely play a key role in the absence of dieback (Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The transient reversal of the Amazon dieback region from carbon sink to source highlights the complex interplay between climate and carbon cycle dynamics.
“Although most models project a return to carbon neutrality by the 23rd century, the transient reversal from sink to source highlights the complex interplay between climate and carbon cycle dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Amazon is highly vulnerable to climate change, particularly under warming scenarios that push local climate conditions beyond the physiological tolerance of tropical forest ecosystems.
“The study underscores the heightened vulnerability of the Amazon to climate change, particularly under warming scenarios that push local climate conditions beyond the physiological tolerance of tropical forest ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ESM-based estimates of the Amazon dieback threshold may be overly optimistic, because most models lack detailed representations of fire dynamics and drought-induced tree mortality in tropical forests.
“However, our ESM-based estimates may be overly optimistic, as most models lack detailed representations of fire dynamics and drought-induced tree mortality in tropical forests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
McKay et al., integrating multiple evidence sources, find that ESMs tend to estimate higher dieback thresholds than other approaches.
“McKay et al. integrate multiple evidence sources and find that ESMs tend to estimate higher dieback thresholds than other approaches, aligning with our results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] McKay, D. I. A. et al. Exceeding 1.5 °C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022). source
- Interpretationnone given
Despite variations in timing and extent, the models consistently identify temperature, precipitation and land-use disturbances as key factors reducing the Amazon rainforest's resilience.
“Despite variations in timing and extent, models consistently identify temperature, precipitation and land-use disturbances as key factors reducing the Amazon rainforest's resilience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFire-vegetation feedbacks can reduce ecosystem resilience and promote persistent forest degradation.
“Recent studies highlight that fire-vegetation feedbacks can reduce ecosystem resilience and promote persistent forest degradation 26,59,60 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Cano, I. M. et al. Abrupt loss and uncertain recovery from fires of Amazon forests under low climate mitigation scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203200119 (2022). source
- cites [59] Drüke, M. et al. Fire may prevent future Amazon forest recovery after large-scale deforestation. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 248 (2023). source
- cites [60] Flores, B. M. & Holmgren, M. White-sand savannas expand at the core of the Amazon after forest wildfires. Ecosystems 24, 1624–1637 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInternal feedbacks sustain alternative ecological states, consistent with tipping point theory.
“These dynamics align with tipping point theory, where internal feedbacks sustain alternative ecological states 61 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] van Nes, E. H. et al. Causal feedbacks in climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 445–448 (2015). source
The available indexed passages contain bibliographic metadata and keywords, not the paper’s substantive discussion (the records labelled Abstract have no abstract text). Searches for internal feedbacks sustaining alternative ecological states and for alternative stable states and tipping points found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationENSO is an important driver of climate variability in the Amazon basin, influencing temperature, precipitation and ecosystem dynamics.
“The ENSO is an important driver of climate variability in the Amazon basin, influencing temperature, precipitation and ecosystem dynamics [66][67][68] .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [66] Mastropierro, M., Peano, D. & Zanchettin, D. Uncertainty in Amazon vegetation productivity in CMIP6 projections driven by surface energy fluxes. EGUsphere 2024, 1–26 (2024). source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites [67] Geng, T., Cai, W., Jia, F. & Wu, L. Decreased ENSO post-2100 in response to formation of a permanent El Niño-like state under greenhouse warming. Nat. Commun. 15, 5810 (2024). source
The Introduction calls ENSO a major mode of climate variability, and the Results section on a permanent El Niño-like state describes rainfall anomalies over eastern South America. The paper does not identify the Amazon basin or address ENSO’s effects on its temperature or ecosystem dynamics (searched: Amazon, ecosystem, temperature, South America). (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [68] Peng, Q., Xie, S.-P. & Deser, C. Collapsed upwelling projected to weaken ENSO under sustained warming beyond the twenty-first century. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 815–822 (2024). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSSP5-8.5 projects a fossil-fuel-intensive future with high greenhouse gas emissions and minimal policy interventions, reflecting radiative forcing levels similar to RCP8.5.
“Its successor, SSP5-8.5 projects a fossil-fuel-intensive future with high greenhouse gas emissions and minimal policy interventions, reflecting similar radiative forcing levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Kriegler, E. et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 297–315 (2017). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPresent-day GPP estimates from the ESMs were evaluated against the FLUXCOM-X-BASE and MUSES GPP products.
“We evaluate the present-day GPP estimates against FLUXCOM-X-BASE GPP product 31 , which uses machine learning trained on eddy covariance data to generate global estimates, and MUltiscale Satellite remotE Sensing (MUSES) GPP product 32 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Nelson, J. A. et al. X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X. Biogeosciences 21, 5079–5115 (2024). source
- cites [32] Wang, J. et al. New global MuSyQ GPP/NPP remote sensing products from 1981 to 2018. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 14, 5596–5612 (2021). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRCP8.5 assumes a continued rise in greenhouse gas emissions without mitigation, leading to a radiative forcing of 8.5 W m-2 by 2100.
“RCP8.5 assumes a continued rise in greenhouse gas emissions without mitigation, leading to a radiative forcing of 8.5 W m -2 by 2100.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Riahi, K. et al. RCP 8.5—a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim. Chang. 109, 33 (2011). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataERA5 reanalysis data were used to estimate the present-day climate in the dieback grid cells and to evaluate ESM performance for current precipitation and temperature.
“We use ERA5 monthly averaged data 64 to estimate the present-day climate in the dieback grid cells and evaluate the performance of the ESM for current precipitation and temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Hersbach, H. et al. ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.f17050d7 (2023) (Accessed on 27 July 2025). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 include substantial land-use change emissions, which are largely offset by climate-induced forest regrowth.
“While both scenarios include substantial LUC emissions, these are largely offset by climate-induced forest regrowth 43 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Davies-Barnard, T., Valdes, P. J., Singarayer, J. S., Wiltshire, A. J. & Jones, C. D. Quantifying the relative importance of land cover change from climate and land use in the representative concentration pathways. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 842–853 (2015). source
In the Discussion and Conclusions (lines 379–381), the paper says climate-induced forest increase partially offsets the reduced carbon sink from land-use change; it also reports that climate-induced land-cover change offsets 91% of anthropogenic deforestation in RCP8.5 (lines 398–401). These findings support an offset in RCP8.5, but do not establish that land-use-change emissions themselves are largely offset. The paper does not address SSP5-8.5, so it cannot support the claim for both scenarios. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent studies suggest potential changes in ENSO variability and an increased occurrence of El Niño-like warming under sustained warming.
“Recent studies on ENSO's long-term behaviour under sustained warming suggest potential changes in its variability and the increased occurrence of El Niño-like warming 67,68 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] Geng, T., Cai, W., Jia, F. & Wu, L. Decreased ENSO post-2100 in response to formation of a permanent El Niño-like state under greenhouse warming. Nat. Commun. 15, 5810 (2024). source
- cites [68] Peng, Q., Xie, S.-P. & Deser, C. Collapsed upwelling projected to weaken ENSO under sustained warming beyond the twenty-first century. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 815–822 (2024). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeforestation peaks in the first half of the 21st century.
“Besides, the deforestation peaks in the first half of the 21st century 41 , with land cover assumed to remain constant beyond 2100.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Chang. 109, 117 (2011). source
The RCP8.5 scenario description (section 2.3 Biomass density; page unavailable) projects forest-cover loss of 300 million hectares from 2000 to 2050, versus 150 million hectares from 2050 to 2100. That supports faster loss in the first half of the century for one scenario, but does not establish a deforestation peak or the unqualified claim across scenarios. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRepeated fires can lead to grass invasion, increased flammability and suppressed canopy recovery, particularly at the forest-savanna transition.
“Repeated fires can lead to grass invasion, increased flammability and suppressed canopy recovery, particularly at the forest-savanna transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Cano, I. M. et al. Abrupt loss and uncertain recovery from fires of Amazon forests under low climate mitigation scenarios. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203200119 (2022). source
- cites [59] Drüke, M. et al. Fire may prevent future Amazon forest recovery after large-scale deforestation. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 248 (2023). source
- cites [60] Flores, B. M. & Holmgren, M. White-sand savannas expand at the core of the Amazon after forest wildfires. Ecosystems 24, 1624–1637 (2021). source
The Introduction and Soil Shift sections (pages unavailable) say recurrent fires can keep burnt forests open, while the Vegetation Shift section reports persistent herbaceous cover after fire. But the paper reports native herbs rather than grass invasion in its study sites, explicitly notes that non-native invasive grasses were absent, and studies floodplain forests at the Amazon’s core rather than establishing the claim particularly for forest–savanna transitions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataESMs indicate high past GPP levels in the Amazon basin, with a wide range of GPP estimates in the historical period.
“ESMs indicate high past GPP levels in the Amazon basin, which is the main driver of gross carbon flux into the land ecosystem and an indicator of vegetation activity, with a wide range of GPP estimates in the historical period (Figs. 1 and S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmazon dieback is projected to begin around year 2087 ± 49 and complete by year 2195 ± 25 in the considered grid cells under RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5.
“On average, Amazon dieback is projected to begin around year 2087 ± 49 and complete by year 2195 ± 25 in the considered grid cells under the RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMIROC-ES2L projects the latest onset of dieback, beginning in the second half of the 22nd century, with the most abrupt GPP decline.
“In contrast, MIROC-ES2L projects the latest onset of dieback, beginning in the second half of the 22nd century, with the most abrupt GPP decline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOn average, annual local surface air temperature above 32.2 ± 4.8 °C is associated with the onset of Amazon dieback.
“On average, annual local surface air temperature above 32.2 ± 4.8 °C and precipitation below 1394.3 ± 306.0 mm year -1 are associated with the onset of the Amazon dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningModels with coarser spatial resolution show large spatial variations in GPP changes by the end of the 23rd century, with dieback grid cells sometimes adjacent to grid cells of GPP increase.
“Models with coarser spatial resolution, such as IPSL-CM5A-LR and MIROC-ES2L, show large spatial variations in GPP changes by the end of the 23rd century, with dieback grid cells sometimes adjacent to the grid cells of GPP increase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlobal warming levels at Amazon dieback onset range from 1.5 °C in CESM2-WACCM to 10.2 °C in CanESM5, with an inter-model mean of 5.0 ± 2.9 °C.
“with a range from 1.5 °C in CESM2-WACCM to 10.2 °C in CanESM5, and the inter-model mean value of 5.0° ± 2.9 °C (Table 2, Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGISS-E2-R and HadGEM2-ES estimate the highest historical GPP among all ESMs, higher than machine-learning and satellite-based products.
“GISS-E2-R and HadGEM2-ES estimate the highest historical GPP among all ESMs, and higher estimates compared to machine-learning and satellite-based products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe timing of dieback onset shows a strong linear relationship with GSAT, with models that delay dieback exhibiting higher GSAT thresholds.
“The timing of dieback onset shows a strong linear relationship with GSAT, with models that delay dieback exhibiting higher GSAT thresholds (Fig. 2e and Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is less inter-model variability in the timing of dieback completion than in onset, with a strong negative linear relationship between onset year and dieback duration.
“Notably, there is less inter-model variability in the timing of dieback completion than in onset, with a strong negative linear relationship between onset year and dieback duration (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTemperature is the dominant driver of dieback in most models, although precipitation exerts a strong influence in some, particularly among the CMIP5 ensemble.
“The results show that temperature is the dominant driver of dieback in most models, although precipitation exerts a strong influence in some, particularly among the CMIP5 ensemble.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCanESM5 and MIROC-ES2L show a stronger sensitivity of GPP to rising temperatures, while other models show a dependence on the combined effects of rising temperatures and decreasing precipitation.
“CanESM5 and MIROC-ES2L show a stronger sensitivity of GPP to rising temperatures, while other models show a dependence on the combined effects of rising temperatures and decreasing precipitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe models without dieback predict future GSAT changes ranging from the lowest values to near the inter-model mean, with moderate to negligible reductions in annual precipitation over the Amazon.
“These models predict future GSAT changes ranging from the lowest values to near the inter-model mean, with moderate to negligible reductions in annual precipitation over the Amazon (Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMPI-ESM-LR shows a moderate GPP decline despite an increased temperature (>40 °C) and reduced precipitation (<700 mm year-1), but this does not meet the dieback criteria.
“MPI-ESM-LR shows a moderate GPP decline despite an increased temperature (>40 °C) and reduced precipitation (<700 mm year -1 ), but this does not meet the dieback criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBCC-CSM1-1 and MPI-ESM-LR do not exhibit dieback despite having global and Amazon temperature trends similar to models that do.
“However, two other models (BCC-CSM1-1 and MPI-ESM-LR) also do not exhibit dieback, despite having global and Amazon temperature trends similar to models that do.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGISS-E2-R has the smallest GSAT increase by the late 21st century, alongside slight precipitation increases and a substantial increase in mean Amazon GPP.
“GISS-E2-R has the smallest GSAT increase by the late 21st century, alongside slight precipitation increases and a substantial increase in mean Amazon GPP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the models with dynamic vegetation components, UKESM1-0-LL and HadGEM2-ES both show extensive Amazon dieback.
“Of these, UKESM1-0-LL, which projects substantial temperature increases and decreases in precipitation, and HadGEM2-ES, with a large decrease in precipitation, both show extensive dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBy the end of the 21st century, CanESM5 simulates the highest global land temperatures, leading to a large Amazon dieback area due to surface temperature increases.
“By the end of the 21st century, CanESM5 simulates the highest global land temperatures, leading to a large Amazon dieback area due to surface temperature increases (Fig. S3a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataLand-use change occurs primarily on the periphery of the Amazon basin.
“Further analysis of the two LUH phases data (Fig. S8) indicates that LUC occurs primarily on the periphery of the Amazon basin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMPI-ESM-LR, a model with a dynamic vegetation component, does not predict Amazon dieback but simulates a GPP decrease.
“Another model with a dynamic vegetation component, MPI-ESM-LR, does not predict dieback but simulates GPP decrease (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMIROC-ES2L projects localised dieback associated with mean annual surface air temperatures reaching 36.8 ± 0.6 °C, occurring later due to its lower global temperature trajectory.
“Similarly, MIROC-ES2L projects localised dieback associated with mean annual surface air temperatures reaching 36.8 ± 0.6 °C, but this occurs later due to its lower global temperature trajectory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningModels with more resilient vegetation or slower carbon cycle feedbacks may delay dieback initiation, leading to a more sudden loss of productivity once thresholds are crossed.
“This suggests that models with more resilient vegetation or slower carbon cycle feedbacks may delay dieback initiation, leading to a more sudden loss of productivity once thresholds are crossed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningModels with more resilient Amazon vegetation maintain GPP for longer but experience more abrupt losses at higher warming levels.
“This suggests that models with more resilient Amazon vegetation maintain GPP for longer but experience more abrupt losses at higher warming levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCoupled ESMs' ecosystem components typically do not represent lateral ecological interactions between grid cells, so dieback in one location does not directly influence neighbouring cells through ecological interactions.
“Furthermore, although coupled ESMs capture some cross-grid feedbacks through the atmosphere, their ecosystem components typically do not represent lateral ecological interactions between grid cells, meaning that dieback in one location does not directly influence neighbouring cells through ecological interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCurrent models may underrepresent fire as a key accelerator of Amazon dieback.
“The Global Tipping Points Report (2023) further emphasises that current models may underrepresent fire as a key accelerator of Amazon dieback 6 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] McKay, D. I. A. et al. Section 1. Earth system tipping points. Chapter 1.3 Tipping points in the biosphere. in The Global Tipping Points Report 2023 (University of Exeter, 2023).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe increased precipitation projected by BCC-CSM1-1 in these grid cells is likely due to a northward ITCZ shift, creating more humid conditions that prevent dieback.
“In contrast, BCC-CSM1-1 projects increased precipitation in these grid cells, likely due to a northward ITCZ shift (Figs.S3a, S7), creating more humid conditions that prevent dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA Savitzky-Golay filter with a 10-year window and a second-order polynomial was applied to the GPP series to reduce the impact of interannual variability.
“To reduce the impact of interannual variability, which often masks long-term vegetation trends, we applied a Savitzky-Golay filter 65 with a 10-year window and a second-order polynomial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Gallagher, N. B. Savitzky-golay smoothing and differentiation filter. Eigenvector Research Incorporated, Manson, WA, USA, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://eigenvector.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/SavitzkyGolay.pdf (Aaccessed on 27 July 2025).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDynamic vegetation enables species adaptation to warmer, drier conditions, but under severe climate change plant functional types may not adjust quickly enough to prevent large-scale dieback.
“Dynamic vegetation enables species adaptation to warmer, drier conditions, but under severe climate change, plant functional types may not adjust quickly enough to prevent large-scale dieback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Land cover remains constant beyond 2100 under the RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios.
“land cover is assumed to remain constant beyond 2100 41,42”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 3 and Methods use different GPP baselines for dieback thresholds
MajorThe Figure 3 caption says its climatic thresholds are measured when GPP reaches 20% of its maximum, whereas the Methods say the corresponding climatic conditions are extracted when GPP reaches 20% of its pre-industrial mean. Those baselines need not coincide.
“Values in the boxes at the top right of each subplot indicate the inter-grid cell mean and uncertainty range via one SD of temperature and precipitation at which GPP values decrease to 20% of their maximum (i.e.timing of dieback occurrence).”
“Specifically, we identified the years when GPP in each dieback-affected grid cell declined to 20 ± 1% of its pre-industrial mean (based on 19th-century values).”
Figure 4 period labels disagree with the stated classification periods
MinorThe Figure 4 caption describes a 50-year period around 2000, but the Methods list 1850-1899 as the first classification period and no period around 2000.
“Spatial variation of Köppen-Geiger climate classes by a-f CMIP5 and g-l CMIP6 ESMs under RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, averaged (using 50-year spans) around years 2000, 2050, 2150 and 2250.”
“We applied the KG algorithm to monthly surface air temperature and precipitation outputs from each ESM using non-overlapping 50-year periods: 1850-1899 (reference), 2050-2099, 2150-2199, and 2250-2299.”
Conclusion reports a different uncertainty for the warming threshold
MinorThe conclusion gives the mean warming at dieback onset as 5.0 ± 1.9 °C, while the results and Table 2 give 5.0 ± 2.9 °C for the same quantity.
“On average, ESMs project the onset of Amazon dieback by the late 21st century under 5.0 ± 1.9 °C of global warming (ranging from 1.5 to 10.2 °C).”
“the inter-model mean value of 5.0° ± 2.9 °C (Table 2, Fig. 2b).”
Dieback onset is not confined to the 21st century
MinorThe abstract places dieback onset within the 21st century across its stated warming range, but the results identify a model whose onset begins in the second half of the 22nd century.
“The dieback onset is projected within the 21st century under global warming levels ranging from 1.5 to 10.2 °C”
“In contrast, MIROC-ES2L projects the latest onset of dieback, beginning in the second half of the 22nd century, with the most abrupt GPP decline.”
Cites
Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification
(2007) · doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 · Cited by 13,640 · see citing works
Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., & Wood, E. F. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.214 · Cited by 7,015 · see citing works
Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system
Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705414105 · Cited by 3,982 · see citing works
The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J., Bacmeister, J. T., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., García, R. R., Gettelman, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001916 · Cited by 3,273 · see citing works
The Community Climate System Model Version 4
Gent, P. R., Gokhan Danabasoglu, C., Donner, L. J., Holland, M. M., Hunke, E., Jayne, S. R., Lawrence, D. M., Neale, R., Rasch, P. J., Vertenstein, M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2011jcli4083.1 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions
Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., & Rafaj, P. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y · Cited by 2,791 · see citing works
Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points
Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., Sakschewski, B., Loriani, S., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Rockström, J., & Lenton, T. M. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn7950 · Cited by 1,931 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Building onthese fi ndings 1,9,16 , we proposethatthe Amazonecosystem shifts might unfold over a longer timescale, highlighting the necessity of analyses that extend well past the 21st century.”
InfluentialClimate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
Dufresne, J., Foujols, M., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y. J., Bekki, S., Bellenger, H., Benshila, R., et al. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1 · Cited by 1,787 · see citing works
Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model
Boucher, O., Servonnat, J., Albright, A. L., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y. J., Bastrikov, V., Bekki, S., Bonnet, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms002010 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Giorgetta, M. A., Jungclaus, J. H., Reick, C. H., Legutke, S., Bader, J., Böttinger, M., Brovkin, V. A., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fieg, K., et al. (2013) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1002/jame.20038 · Cited by 1,668 · see citing works
The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3)
Swart, N. C., Cole, J. N. S., Kharin, V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J., Gillett, N. P., Anstey, J. A., Arora, V. K., Christian, J. R., Hanna, S., et al. (2019) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model
Sellar, A., Jones, C., Mulcahy, J. P., Tang, Y., Yool, A., Wiltshire, A., O’Connor, F. M., Stringer, M. A., Hill, R., Palmiéri, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2019ms001739 · Cited by 1,341 · see citing works
Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332 · see citing works
Hurtt, G. C., Chini, L. P., Frolking, S., Betts, R. A., Feddema, J., Fischer, G., Fisk, J. P., Hibbard, K., Houghton, R. A., Janetos, A., et al. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6
HURTT, G. C., Chini, L. P., Sahajpal, R., Frolking, S., Bodirsky, B. L., Calvin, K., Doelman, J., Fisk, J., Fujimori, S., Goldewijk, K. K., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020 · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
The temperature response of C <sub>3</sub> and C <sub>4</sub> photosynthesis
SAGE, R. F., & KUBIEN, D. S. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present
Service, C. C. C. (2019) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) · doi:10.24381/cds.f17050d7 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest
Malhi, Y., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Galbraith, D., Huntingford, C., Fisher, R., Zelazowski, P., Sitch, S., McSweeney, C., & Meir, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804619106 · Cited by 925 · see citing works
The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations
JONES, C. D., Hughes, J. K., Bellouin, N., Hardiman, S. C., Jones, G. S., Knight, J. R., Liddicoat, S. K., O’Connor, F. M., Andres, R. J., Bell, C., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-543-2011 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century
Cox, P. M., Betts, R., Collins, M. D., Harris, P. P., Huntingford, C., & JONES, C. D. (2004) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-004-0049-4 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models
Tokarska, K. B., Stolpe, M. B., Sippel, S., Fischer, E. M., Smith, C., Lehner, F., & Knutti, R. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability
Cox, P. M., Pearson, D., Booth, B. B. B., Friedlingstein, P., Huntingford, C., JONES, C. D., & Luke, C. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11882 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century
Kriegler, E., Bauer, N., Popp, A., Humpenöder, F., Leimbach, M., Strefler, J., Baumstark, L., Bodirsky, B. L., Hilaire, J., Klein, D., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive
Schmidt, G. A., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R. A., Russell, G. L., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S. E., Bhat, M. K., Bleck, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1002/2013ms000265 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
Damour, G., Simonneau, T., Cochard, H., & Urban, L. (2010) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Schulzweida, U. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1435454 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s
Boulton, C. A., Lenton, T. M., & Boers, N. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-022-01287-8 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Katul, G. G., Ram Oren, G., Manzoni, S., Higgins, C. W., & Parlange, M. B. (2012) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2011rg000366 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Hajima, T., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Tatebe, H., Aita, M. N., Abe, M., Ohgaito, R., Ito, A., Yamazaki, D., Okajima, H., et al. (2020) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-2197-2020 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5
Ziehn, T., Chamberlain, M. A., Law, R. M., Lenton, A. A., Bodman, R. W., Dix, M., Stevens, L. E., Wang, Y., & Srbinovsky, J. (2020) · Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science · doi:10.1071/es19035 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation
Lapola, D. M., Pinho, P., Barlow, J., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Berenguer, E., Carmenta, R., Liddy, H. M., Seixas, H., Silva, C. V. J., Silva-Junior, C. H. L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abp8622 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests
McDowell, N., Allen, C. D., Anderson‐Teixeira, K., Brando, P., Brienen, R., Chambers, J., Christoffersen, B., Davies, S., Doughty, C., Duque, A., et al. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15027 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass
Terrer, C., Jackson, R. B., Prentice, I. C., Keenan, T. F., Kaiser, C., Vicca, S., Fisher, J. B., Reich, P. B., Stocker, B. D., Hungate, B. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Smith, N. G., & Dukes, J. S. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02797.x · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Cleveland, C. C., Townsend, A. R., Taylor, P., Álvarez-Clare, S., Bustamante, M., Chuyong, G. B., Dobrowski, S. Z., Grierson, P. F., Harms, K. E., Houlton, B. Z., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01658.x · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2-induced climate change
Huntingford, C., Zelazowski, P., Galbraith, D. R., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S. A., Fisher, R. A., Lomas, M. R., Walker, A. P., JONES, C. D., Booth, B. B. B., et al. (2013) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1741 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Catalogue of abrupt shifts in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate models
Drijfhout, S., Bathiany, S., Beaulieu, C., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Huntingford, C., Scheffer, M., Sgubin, G., & Swingedouw, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1511451112 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change
Cao, L., Bala, G., Caldeira, K., Nemani, R., & Ban‐Weiss, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913000107 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Wu, T., Li, W., Ji, J., Xin, X., Li, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, F., Wei, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/jgrd.50320 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Ito, A., & Oikawa, T. (2002) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00473-2 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationA catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species
Powers, J. S., Vargas G., G., Brodribb, T. J., Schwartz, N. B., Pérez‐Aviles, D., Smith‐Martin, C. M., Becknell, J. M., Aureli, F., Blanco, R., Calderón‐Morales, E., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15037 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review
Wunderling, N., von der Heydt, A. S., Aksenov, Y., Barker, S., Bastiaansen, R., Brovkin, V. A., Brunetti, M., Couplet, V., Kleinen, T., Lear, C. H., et al. (2024) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-15-41-2024 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Past abrupt changes, tipping points and cascading impacts in the Earth system
Brovkin, V. A., Brook, E. J., Williams, J. W., Bathiany, S., Lenton, T. M., Barton, C. M., DeConto, R. M., Donges, J. F., Ganopolski, A., McManus, J. F., et al. (2021) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00790-5 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Emergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they hold for CMIP6?
Schlund, M., Lauer, A., Gentine, P., Sherwood, S. C., & Eyring, V. (2020) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-11-1233-2020 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Harmonization of Global Land-Use Change and Management for the Period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6Preprint
HURTT, G. C., Chini, L. P., Sahajpal, R., et al. (2020) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2019-360 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Causal feedbacks in climate change
van Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M., Brovkin, V., Lenton, T. M., Ye, H., Deyle, E., & Sugihara, G. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2568 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Nelson, J. A., Walther, S., Gans, F., Kraft, B., Weber, U., Novick, K., Buchmann, N., Migliavacca, M., Wohlfahrt, G., Šigut, L., et al. (2024) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Emergent constraints on future precipitation changes
Shiogama, H., Watanabe, M., Kim, H., & Hirota, N. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04310-8 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationAmazon forest biogeography predicts resilience and vulnerability to drought
Chen, S., Stark, S. C., Nobre, A. D., Cuartas, L. A., Amore, D. J., Restrepo‐Coupé, N., Smith, M. N., Chitra‐Tarak, R., Ko, H., Nelson, B., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07568-w · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Response of the Amazon rainforest to late Pleistocene climate variability
Häggi, C., Chiessi, C. M., Merkel, U., Mulitza, S., Prange, M., Schulz, M., & Schefuß, E. (2017) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.09.013 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
The South American monsoon approaches a critical transition in response to deforestation
Bochow, N., & Boers, N. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.add9973 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
New Global MuSyQ GPP/NPP Remote Sensing Products From 1981 to 2018
Wang, J., Sun, R., Zhang, H., Xiao, Z., Zhu, A., Wang, M., Yu, T., & Xiang, K. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2021.3076075 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
White-Sand Savannas Expand at the Core of the Amazon After Forest Wildfires
Flores, B. M., & Holmgren, M. (2021) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-021-00607-x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Tropical forests in the Americas are changing too slowly to track climate change
Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, J., Díaz, S. M., Rifai, S. W., Corral‐Rivas, J. J., Nava‐Miranda, M. G., González‐M., R., Hurtado‐M, A. B., Salinas, N., Vilanova, E., de Almeida, E. C., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adl5414 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Sasai, T., Ichii, K., Yamaguchi, Y., & Nemani, R. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jg000045 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Observational constraints indicate risk of drying in the Amazon basin
Shiogama, H., Emori, S., Hanasaki, N., Abe, M., Masutomi, Y., Takahashi, K., & Nozawa, T. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1252 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence of localised Amazon rainforest dieback in CMIP6 models
Parry, I. M., Ritchie, P. D. L., & Cox, P. M. (2022) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-13-1667-2022 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Ito, A., Nishina, K., Reyer, C., François, L., Henrot, A., Munhoven, G., Jacquemin, I., Tian, H., Yang, J., Pan, S., et al. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa7a19 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationNet loss of biomass predicted for tropical biomes in a changing climate
Uribe, M. D. R., Coe, M. T., Castanho, A. D. D. A., Macedo, M. N., do Valle, D. R., & Brando, P. M. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01600-z · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Impact of Amazonian deforestation on precipitation reverses between seasons
Qin, Y., Wang, D., Ziegler, A. D., Fu, B., & Zeng, Z. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08570-y · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Davies‐Barnard, T., Valdes, P. J., Singarayer, J. S., Wiltshire, A. J., & Jones, C. D. (2015) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2014gb004949 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Impact of an AMOC weakening on the stability of the southern Amazon rainforest
Ciemer, C., Winkelmann, R., Kurths, J., & Boers, N. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00186-x · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Ito, A., & Oikawa, T. (2000) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr015161 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationGeng, T., Cai, W., Jia, F., & Wu, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50156-9 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Collapsed upwelling projected to weaken ENSO under sustained warming beyond the twenty-first century
Peng, Q., Xie, S.-P., & Deser, C. (2024) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-024-02061-8 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Fire may prevent future Amazon forest recovery after large-scale deforestation
Drüke, M., Sakschewski, B., von Bloh, W., Billing, M., Lucht, W., & Thonicke, K. (2023) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00911-5 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Collision Course: Development Pushes Amazonia Toward Its Tipping Point
Walker, R. T. (2020) · Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/00139157.2021.1842711 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Slot, M., Rifai, S. W., & Winter, K. (2021) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14049 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Exploring uncertainty of Amazon dieback in a perturbed parameter Earth system ensemble
Boulton, C. A., Booth, B. B. B., & Good, P. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13733 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Cano, I. M., Shevliakova, E., Malyshev, S., John, J. G., Yu, Y., Smith, B., & Pacala, S. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2203200119 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Future increases in Amazonia water stress from CO2 physiology and deforestation
Li, Y., Baker, J. C. A., Brando, P. M., Hoffman, F. M., Lawrence, D. M., Morton, D. C., Swann, A. L. S., Uribe, M. D. R., & Randerson, J. T. (2023) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-023-00128-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Nian, D., Bathiany, S., Ben‐Yami, M., Blaschke, L. L., Hirota, M., Rodrigues, R. R., & Boers, N. (2023) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-01123-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Predicting global terrestrial biomes with the LeNet convolutional neural network
Sato, H., & Ise, T. (2022) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-15-3121-2022 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Reduced ENSO Variability due to a Collapsed Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Orihuela‐Pinto, B., Santoso, A., England, M. H., & Taschetto, A. S. (2022) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-21-0293.1 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Response of Amazonian forests to mid‐Holocene drought: A model‐data comparison
Smith, R. J., Singarayer, J. S., & Mayle, F. E. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15929 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Melnikova, I., Yokohata, T., Ito, A., Nishina, K., Tachiiri, K., & Shiogama, H. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51474-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationFuture Drought‐Induced Tree Mortality Risk in Amazon Rainforest
Yao, Y., Ciais, P., Joetzjer, É., Hong, S., Li, W., Zhu, L., & Viovy, N. (2024) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2023ef003740 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X
Nelson, J. A., Walther, S., Kraft, B., Gans, F., Duveiller, G., Weber, U., Hamdi, Z. M., Zhang, W., Jung, M., & Contributors, F. (2024) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-16573 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Future drought-induced tree mortality risk in Amazon rainforest
Yao, Y. (2023) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7601014 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mastropierro, M., Peano, D., & Zanchettin, D. (2024) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-823-supplement
Avissar, R., Dias, P. L. S., Dias, M. A. F. S., & Nobre, C. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002704
Evidence of localised Amazon rainforest dieback in CMIP6 models
Parry, I., Ritchie, P., & Cox, P. (2023) · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-17341
Schulzweida, U. (2022) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7112925
Emergent constraints on Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity in CMIP5: do they hold for CMIP6?
Schlund, M., Lauer, A., Gentine, P., Sherwood, S. C., & Eyring, V. (2020) · doi:10.5194/esd-2020-49
Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s
Boulton, C., Lenton, T., & Boers, N. (2021) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-379902/v1
Predicting Global Terrestrial Biomes with Convolutional Neural Network
Sato, H., & Ise, T. (2021) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2021-271
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- McKay, D. I. A. et al. Section 1. Earth system tipping points. Chapter 1.3 Tipping points in the biosphere. in The Global Tipping Points Report 2023 (University of Exeter, 2023).
- Eva, H. D. et al. A Proposal for Defining the Geographical Boundaries of Amazonia; Synthesis of the Results from an Expert Consultation Workshop Organized by the European Commission in Collaboration with the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization-JRC Ispra, 7-8 June 2005 (European Commission, 2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The implications of overshooting 1.5 °C on Earth system tipping elements—a review
Ritchie, P. D. L., Steinert, N. J., Abrams, J. F., Alkhayuon, H., Arnscheidt, C. W., Bochow, N., Chapman, R. R., Clarke, J., Dennis, D., Donges, J. F., et al. (2026) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ae3cad · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Biodiversity loss will decrease the future creditworthiness of nations
Agarwala, M., Burke, M., Klusak, P., Kraemer, M., Volz, U., & Sovacool, B. K. (2026) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-026-03081-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ecological boundaries must be incorporated in the post-COP30 climate regime
Shao, Q. (2026) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-026-03337-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A simple dynamical system for representing climate tipping points with hysteresis
Huntingford, C., Ritchie, P. D. L., & Clarke, J. J. (2026) · Nonlinear processes in geophysics · doi:10.5194/npg-33-385-2026
Guimarães, W. D. S., Siqueira, J. A. M., Barros, A. V. D. P., da Piedade, G. J. L., Lobo, P. D. S., Teixeira, D. M., Gabbay, Y. B., Guerra, S. D. F. D. S., & Póvoa, M. M. (2026) · Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde · doi:10.5123/s2176-6223202601821
- Authors
- Melnikova, I., Hajima, T., Shiogama, H., Hayashi, M., Ito, A., Nishina, K., Tachiiri, K., & Yokohata, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Melnikova, Irina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Communications Earth & Environment
- Published
- 2025-08-20
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2662-4435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413337866
- Semantic Scholar
- 58875bc2692c3df559159e27438608c37d491294
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications Earth & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency (JP-MEERF20242001)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMXD0722681344, JP24K20979)
- Ministry of Environment
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24K20979, JPMXD0722681344)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- climate change projections, Earth system models, high-emission scenario, precipitation thresholds, land use change, atmospheric circulation changes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-03.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-03.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review