The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis
Open accessAbstract
One of the central issues in evolutionary developmental biology is how we can formulate the relationships between evolutionary and developmental processes. Two major models have been proposed: the 'funnel-like' model, in which the earliest embryo shows the most conserved morphological pattern, followed by diversifying later stages, and the 'hourglass' model, in which constraints are imposed to conserve organogenesis stages, which is called the phylotypic period. Here we perform a quantitative comparative transcriptome analysis of several model vertebrate embryos and show that the pharyngula stage is most conserved, whereas earlier and later stages are rather divergent. These results allow us to predict approximate developmental timetables between different species, and indicate that pharyngula embryos have the most conserved gene expression profiles, which may be the source of the basic body plan of vertebrates. The conservation of embryonic development across species is of great interest in evolutionary biology. Here, using transcriptome analysis, the authors show that the pharyngula stage of development—in mid-embryogenesis—is conserved between mice, chickens, frogs and zebrafish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
The zootype and the phylotypic stage
Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H., & Graham, C. F. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361490a0 · Cited by 699
Conserved Patterns of Cell Movements during Vertebrate Gastrulation
Solnica-Krezel, L. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.016 · Cited by 391
The last common bilaterian ancestor
Erwin, D. H., & Davidson, E. H. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.13.3021 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Baranasic, D., Hörtenhuber, M., Balwierz, P. J., Zehnder, T., Mukarram, A. K., Nepal, C., Várnai, C., Hadzhiev, Y., Jimenez-Gonzalez, A., Li, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01089-w · Cited by 101
Seki, R., Li, C., Fang, Q., Hayashi, S., Egawa, S., Hu, J., Xu, L., Pan, H., Kondo, M., Sato, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14229 · Cited by 84
Self-citationYuan, X., Song, M., Devine, P., Bruneau, B. G., Scott, I. C., & Wilson, M. D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07451-z · Cited by 51
Quantitative proteome dynamics across embryogenesis in a model chordate
Frese, A. N., Mariossi, A., Levine, M. S., & Wühr, M. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109355 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Irie, N., & Kuratani, S.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2011-03-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 248-248
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026907845
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms1248
- The paper
- Irie, N., & Kuratani, S. (2011). Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.