Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 936

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses

Open access
Morriën, Elly, Hannula, S. Emilia, Snoek, L. Basten, Helmsing, Nico R., Zweers, Hans, de Hollander, Mattias, Soto, Raquel Luján, Bouffaud, Marie-Lara, Buée, Marc, Dimmers, Wim, Duyts, Henk, Geisen, Stefan, Girlanda, Mariangela, Griffiths, Rob I., Jørgensen, Helene-Bracht, Jensen, John, Plassart, Pierre, Redecker, Dirk, Schmelz, Rűdiger M, Schmidt, Olaf, Thomson, Bruce C., Tisserant, Emilie, Uroz, Stephane, Winding, Anne, Bailey, Mark J., Bonkowski, Michael, Faber, Jack H., Martin, Francis, Lemanceau, Philippe, de Boer, Wietse, van Veen, Johannes A., van der Putten, Wim H.·2017·Nature Communications

Abstract

Soil organisms have an important role in aboveground community dynamics and ecosystem functioning in terrestrial ecosystems. However, most studies have considered soil biota as a black box or focussed on specific groups, whereas little is known about entire soil networks. Here we show that during the course of nature restoration on abandoned arable land a compositional shift in soil biota, preceded by tightening of the belowground networks, corresponds with enhanced efficiency of carbon uptake. In mid- and long-term abandoned field soil, carbon uptake by fungi increases without an increase in fungal biomass or shift in bacterial-to-fungal ratio. The implication of our findings is that during nature restoration the efficiency of nutrient cycling and carbon uptake can increase by a shift in fungal composition and/or fungal activity. Therefore, we propose that relationships between soil food web structure and carbon cycling in soils need to be reconsidered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms14349

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Setälä, H., Berg, M. P. & Jones, T. H. in Biological Diversity and Function in Soils eds Bardgett R. D., Usher M. B., Hopkins D. W. 236–249Cambridge Univ. Press (2005).
  2. Holtkamp, R. et al. Modelling C and N mineralisation in soil food webs during secondary succession on ex-arable land. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 251–260 (2011). · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.004
  3. van de Voorde, T. F. J., van der Putten, W. H. & Bezemer, T. M. The importance of plant–soil interactions, soil nutrients, and plant life history traits for the temporal dynamics of Jacobaea vulgaris in a chronosequence of old-fields. Oikos 1251–1262 (2012). · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19964.x
  4. Oostenbrink M. in Nematology eds Sasser J. N., Jenkins W. R. 85–102Univ. of North Carolina Press (1960).
  5. Schmelz, R. M. & Rut, C. Guide to European terrestrial and freshwater species of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta): first supplement. VTI Agric. Forestry Res. 357, 53–66 (2012).
  6. Sims, R. W. & Gerard, M. B. in Earthworms: Notes for the Identification of British Species (Synopses of the British Fauna N.S., Vol. 31) (Field Studies Council (1999).

Cited by

See all 936

Metadata

Authors
Morriën, E., Hannula, S. E., Snoek, L. B., Helmsing, N. R., Zweers, H., de Hollander, M., Soto, R. L., Bouffaud, M.-L., Buée, M., Dimmers, W., Duyts, H., Geisen, S., Girlanda, M., Griffiths, R. I., Jørgensen, H.-B., Jensen, J., Plassart, P., Redecker, D., Schmelz, R. M., Schmidt, O., Thomson, B. C., Tisserant, E., Uroz, S., Winding, A., Bailey, M. J., Bonkowski, M., Faber, J. H., Martin, F., Lemanceau, P., de Boer, W., van Veen, J. A., & van der Putten, W. H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
14349-14349
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586942351
Cited by
936
References
61
FWCI
61.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms14349
The paper
Morriën, E., Hannula, S. E., Snoek, L. B., Helmsing, N. R., Zweers, H., de Hollander, M., Soto, R. L., Bouffaud, M.-L., Buée, M., Dimmers, W., Duyts, H., Geisen, S., Girlanda, M., Griffiths, R. I., Jørgensen, H.-B., Jensen, J., Plassart, P., Redecker, D., Schmelz, R. M., . . . van der Putten, W. H. (2017). Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14349

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.